510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

FIX-L PEEK PLIF and T-PLIF System

K243973510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 12, 2025171-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Jeil Medical Corporation · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jun 12, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K190563 (Solco Biomedical Co., Ltd., 2019) after a 171-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1996. 1 of the 6 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall.

Decided
Jun 12, 2025
Review
171 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to P950002 (1996). 5 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 1 of the 6 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

  1. Root · 3 generations backP950002 Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996
  2. 2 generations backK073202 Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled (Class I)
  3. 1 generation backK190563 4CIS PEEK PLIF Cage, 4CIS Pebble Beach PEEK PLIF Cage, 4CIS Torrey…Solco Biomedical Co., Ltd. · 2019
  4. This deviceK243973 FIX-L PEEK PLIF and T-PLIF SystemJeil Medical Corporation · 2025

Class I recalls in this family

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3P950002Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc.1996—
−2K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc.2008Class I
−1K1905634CIS PEEK PLIF Cage, 4CIS Pebble Beach PEEK PLIF Cage, 4CIS Torrey Pines PEEK…Solco Biomedical Co., Ltd.2019—
0 (this device)K243973FIX-L PEEK PLIF and T-PLIF SystemJeil Medical Corporation2025—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200810
201010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K243973, 1996–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K1905634CIS PEEK PLIF Cage, 4CIS Pebble Beach PEEK PLIF Cage, 4CIS Torrey Pines PEEK TLIF Cage…
Summary page 6
…ation of Predicate Device(s) [21 CFR 807.92(a)(3)] The legally marketed device(s) to which substantial equivalence is claimed is/are: Primary Predicate Device K190563 - 4CIS® PEEK PLIF Cage, Solco Biomedical Co., Ltd. Reference Device K212266 - FIX-C PEEK Anterior Cervical Interb…
Solco Biomedical Co., Ltd.2019—
†K212266FIX-C PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody SystemJeil Medical Corporation2021—

Also cleared against K190563: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · 2 generations back · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 29 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 11.4 years on median.
  • 1 of the 5 ancestors has a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K190563.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

FIX-L PEEK PLIF and T-PLIF System is an intervertebral body fusion devices intended for use to skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disk Disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine with up to Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. FIX-L PEEK PLIF and T-PLIF System is indicated to be used with autologous bone graft to facilitate fusion and are intended to be used with supplemental fixation. The device is to be used in patients who have had six months of nonoperative treatment.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K243973: FIX-L PEEK PLIF and T-PLIF System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K243973

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026