510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Gore-Tex Regenerative Material

K922627510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 10, 1994737-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3930

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · NPK Barrier, Synthetic, Intraoral

Cleared on Jun 10, 1994 after a 737-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 12 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 10, 1994
Review
737 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NPK
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

12 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2001: 1 descendant cleared1997: 2 descendants cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2023: 2 descendants cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared1990200020102020
  1. This deviceK922627 Gore-Tex Regenerative MaterialW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1994
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 11 of its ownK964342 Cytoplast GBROsteogenics Co. · 1997
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 7 of its ownK972278 Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co. · 1997 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK143327 Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd. · 2015
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK012144 CytoflexUnicare Biomedical, Inc. · 2001
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK201187 Cytoplast Titanium-Reinforced PTFE MembranesOsteogenics Biomedical, Inc. · 2021

Showing 5 of 12 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1997: 22001: 12010: 12011: 12015: 22016: 12021: 12022: 12023: 2
1997high 2 (1997) · low 0 (1998)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 12 · See all
  • K964342Cytoplast GBROsteogenics Co. · 1997 · cites it directly11descendants
  • K972278Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co. · 1997 · 2 generations on7descendants
  • K143327Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd. · 2015 · 3 generations on2descendants
  • K012144CytoflexUnicare Biomedical, Inc. · 2001 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K201187Cytoplast Titanium-Reinforced PTFE MembranesOsteogenics Biomedical, Inc. · 2021 · 3 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K922627Gore-Tex Regenerative MaterialW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.1994—
+1K964342Cytoplast GBROsteogenics Co.1997—
+2K972278Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co.19971
+3K143327Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd.2015—
+1K012144CytoflexUnicare Biomedical, Inc.2001—
+3K201187Cytoplast Titanium-Reinforced PTFE MembranesOsteogenics Biomedical, Inc.2021—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199720
200110
201010
201110
201520
201610
202110
202210
202320
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K922627, 1994–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NPK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NPK device

  1. #1 K221851 Lumina-PTFE Titaniumscore 7.4 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (12)

See all 12

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K964342Cytoplast GBROsteogenics Co.199711
K012144CytoflexUnicare Biomedical, Inc.20012

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K964342 (Osteogenics Co., 1997) has gone furthest, with 11 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All NPK devices

NPK Barrier, Synthetic, Intraoral: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · NPK

3in 2023

2009: 12010: 22011: 12013: 12015: 22016: 12017: 12021: 12022: 12023: 3
2007high 3 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NPK

529in 2023

2023: 529 days median
2007high 529 (2023)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NPK

No recall names NPK since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · NPK

3in 2022

2008: 12009: 22010: 132011: 352012: 172013: 62014: 12017: 12020: 12021: 22022: 3
2007high 35 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NPK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20091—02
20102—013
20111—035
20120—017
20131—06
20140—01
20152—00
20161—00
20171—01
20180—00
20190—00
20200—01
20211—02
20221—03
2023352900
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K922627: Gore-Tex Regenerative Material.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K922627

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026