510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Neoss Ti Reinforced Membrane

K143327510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 13, 2015144-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3930

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Neoss, Ltd. · NPK Barrier, Synthetic, Intraoral

Cleared on Apr 13, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K960292 (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., 1996) and 1 other predicate after a 144-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1994. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 13, 2015
Review
144 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NPK
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K922627 (1994). 6 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1996: 2 other ancestors1994: 1 other ancestor2015: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant clearedK922627 · Gore-Tex Regenerative Material · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1994K964342 · Cytoplast GBR · Osteogenics Co. · 1997K972278 · Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250 · Osteogenics Co. · 1997 · recalled1990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 2 descendants K972278 · Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250 · Osteogenics Co. · 1997 · recalledK964342 · Cytoplast GBR · Osteogenics Co. · 1997K922627 · Gore-Tex Regenerative Material · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 19940
  1. Root · 3 generations backK922627 Gore-Tex Regenerative MaterialW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1994
  2. 2 generations backK964342 Cytoplast GBROsteogenics Co. · 1997
  3. 1 generation backK972278 Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co. · 1997 · Recalled
  4. This deviceK143327 Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd. · 2015
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK210797 Bio-MEM Ti Reinforced MembraneB&Medi Co., Ltd. · 2022
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK151344 Cytoflex Tefguard Ti-Enforced MembraneUnicare Biomedical, Inc. · 2015

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K210797Bio-MEM Ti Reinforced MembraneB&Medi Co., Ltd. · 2022 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K151344Cytoflex Tefguard Ti-Enforced MembraneUnicare Biomedical, Inc. · 2015 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K922627Gore-Tex Regenerative MaterialW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.1994—
−2K964342Cytoplast GBROsteogenics Co.1997—
−1K972278Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co.19971
0 (this device)K143327Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd.2015—
+1K210797Bio-MEM Ti Reinforced MembraneB&Medi Co., Ltd.2022—
+1K151344Cytoflex Tefguard Ti-Enforced MembraneUnicare Biomedical, Inc.2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
199620

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201510
202210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K143327, 1994–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NPK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NPK device

  1. #1 K221851 Lumina-PTFE Titaniumscore 7.4 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960292Gore-Tex Regenerative Material Titanium Reinforced Configurations
Summary page 4
…Reinforced Membrane Common Name: Nonresorbable Barrier membrane Regulatory Class: II Regulation: 872.3930 Bone grafting material. Product Code: NPK Predicate Device(s): K960292 Gore-Tex Regenerative Material Ti Reinforced Configurations, K972278 Osteogenics Cytoplast Regentex Ti 250 Device Description:…
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.1996—
*K972278Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250
Summary page 4
…latory Class: II Regulation: 872.3930 Bone grafting material. Product Code: NPK Predicate Device(s): K960292 Gore-Tex Regenerative Material Ti Reinforced Configurations, K972278 Osteogenics Cytoplast Regentex Ti 250 Device Description: The Neoss Ti Reinforced Membrane a multi-layer non-resorbable dental…
Osteogenics Co.19971

Also cleared against K960292: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K210797Bio-MEM Ti Reinforced MembraneB&Medi Co., Ltd.20220
K151344Cytoflex Tefguard Ti-Enforced MembraneUnicare Biomedical, Inc.20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 21 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.8 years on median.
  • 2 of the 6 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K210797 (B&Medi Co., Ltd., 2022) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K960292.

How does its category compare?

All NPK devices

NPK Barrier, Synthetic, Intraoral: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NPK

3in 2023

2009: 12010: 22011: 12013: 12015: 22016: 12017: 12021: 12022: 12023: 3
2007high 3 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NPK

529in 2023

2023: 529 days median
2007high 529 (2023)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NPK

No recall names NPK since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · NPK

3in 2022

2008: 12009: 22010: 132011: 352012: 172013: 62014: 12017: 12020: 12021: 22022: 3
2007high 35 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NPK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20091—02
20102—013
20111—035
20120—017
20131—06
20140—01
20152—00
20161—00
20171—01
20180—00
20190—00
20200—01
20211—02
20221—03
2023352900
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

An implantable temporary non-resorbable device (membrane) for use as a spacer creation barrier in the treatment of local defects in the oral cavity in conjunction with tissue regeneration or augmentation. Neoss Ti Reinforced Membranes are intended to be submerged and clinically implanted more than 30 days with an expected duration of implantation up of 6 months.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K143327: Neoss Ti Reinforced Membrane.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K143327

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026