510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2016

Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250

K972278510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 6, 199749-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3930Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Osteogenics Co. · LYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic

Cleared on Aug 6, 1997 as substantially equivalent to K960292 (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., 1996) and 1 other predicate after a 49-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1994. 7 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Aug 6, 1997
Review
49 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LYC
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K922627 (1994). 5 ancestors in all. 7 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1996: 2 other ancestors1994: 1 other ancestor2015: 2 descendants cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant clearedK922627 · Gore-Tex Regenerative Material · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1994K964342 · Cytoplast GBR · Osteogenics Co. · 19971990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 4 descendants2 generations forward: 3 descendants K964342 · Cytoplast GBR · Osteogenics Co. · 1997K922627 · Gore-Tex Regenerative Material · W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 19940
  1. Root · 2 generations backK922627 Gore-Tex Regenerative MaterialW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1994
  2. 1 generation backK964342 Cytoplast GBROsteogenics Co. · 1997
  3. This deviceK972278 Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co. · 1997
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK143327 Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd. · 2015
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK201187 Cytoplast Titanium-Reinforced PTFE MembranesOsteogenics Biomedical, Inc. · 2021
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK091120 Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc. · 2010
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK221851 Lumina-PTFE TitaniumCriteria Industria E Comercio DE Produtos Medicinais · 2023
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK210797 Bio-MEM Ti Reinforced MembraneB&Medi Co., Ltd. · 2022

Showing 5 of 7 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2010: 12011: 12015: 22021: 12022: 12023: 1
2010high 2 (2015) · low 0 (2012)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 7 · See all
  • K143327Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd. · 2015 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K201187Cytoplast Titanium-Reinforced PTFE MembranesOsteogenics Biomedical, Inc. · 2021 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K091120Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K221851Lumina-PTFE TitaniumCriteria Industria E Comercio DE Produtos Medicinais · 2023 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K210797Bio-MEM Ti Reinforced MembraneB&Medi Co., Ltd. · 2022 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K922627Gore-Tex Regenerative MaterialW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.1994—
−1K964342Cytoplast GBROsteogenics Co.1997—
0 (this device)K972278Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co.1997—
+1K143327Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd.2015—
+1K201187Cytoplast Titanium-Reinforced PTFE MembranesOsteogenics Biomedical, Inc.2021—
+1K091120Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc.2010—
+2K221851Lumina-PTFE TitaniumCriteria Industria E Comercio DE Produtos Medicinais2023—
+2K210797Bio-MEM Ti Reinforced MembraneB&Medi Co., Ltd.2022—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
199620

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201110
201520
202110
202210
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K972278, 1994–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LYC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LYC device

  1. #1 K253317 Cytrans™ Elashieldscore 14.3 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960292Gore-Tex Regenerative Material Titanium Reinforced Configurations
Summary page 1
…Non-Absorbable Barrier Membrane Classification Name: Implant, Endosseous For Bone Filling And/Or Augmentation. lil. PREDICATE DEVICES Gore-Tex™ Regenerative Material (K960292; W.L Gore & Associates, Inc.) Cytoplast'™ GBR Membrane (K964342; Osteogenics Co.) IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION The Cytoplast™ Regente…
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.1996—
*K964342Cytoplast GBR
Summary page 1
…ndosseous For Bone Filling And/Or Augmentation. lil. PREDICATE DEVICES Gore-Tex™ Regenerative Material (K960292; W.L Gore & Associates, Inc.) Cytoplast'™ GBR Membrane (K964342; Osteogenics Co.) IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION The Cytoplast™ Regentex Titanium 250 Non-Absorbable Barrier Membrane is composed of na…
Osteogenics Co.1997—

Also cleared against K960292: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (7)

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K143327Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd.20152
K201187Cytoplast Titanium-Reinforced PTFE MembranesOsteogenics Biomedical, Inc.20211
K091120Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc.20101
K151344Cytoflex Tefguard Ti-Enforced MembraneUnicare Biomedical, Inc.20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Sep 7, 2016Class IIZ-0113-2017Labeling mix-upsThe device has the potential to be packaged in the wrong product box.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 3 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.8 years on median.
  • 1 of the 5 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K143327 (Neoss, Ltd., 2015) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K960292.

How does its category compare?

All LYC devices

LYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LYC

3in 2025

2007: 132008: 82009: 142010: 132011: 92012: 52013: 22014: 12016: 22020: 32022: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 14 (2009) · low 0 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LYC

267in 2025

2007: 80 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 164 days median2011: 224 days median2012: 120 days median2020: 156 days median2025: 267 days median2026 (partial year): 266 days median
2007high 267 (2025) · low 73 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LYC

1in 2018

2009: 12010: 22012: 22016: 22018: 1
2007high 2 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LYC

2in 2025

2007: 232008: 252009: 252010: 282011: 212012: 102013: 122014: 92015: 142016: 1402017: 192018: 142019: 152020: 52021: 122022: 62023: 92024: 62025: 2
2007high 140 (2016) · low 2 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LYC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071380023
2008873025
200914100125
201013164228
20119224021
20125120210
20132—012
20141—09
20150—014
20162—2140
20170—019
20180—114
20190—015
2020315605
20210—012
20222—06
20230—09
20240—06
2025326702
202632660—

What is it indicated for?

A temporarily implantable material (non-resorbable) for use as a space-making barrier in the treatment of periodontal bone defects.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K972278: Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K972278

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026