510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2017

Next Generation Knee System

K933785510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 30, 1995544-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3560Recalls 83

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zimmer, Inc. · JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer

Cleared on Jan 30, 1995 after a 544-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 328 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 83 times.

Decided
Jan 30, 1995
Review
544 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JWH
Recalls
83
Predicates
0

328 later devices descend from it, 15 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant cleared2007: 6 descendants cleared2018: 12 descendants cleared2012: 16 descendants cleared2014: 19 descendants cleared2005: 2 descendants cleared2017: 12 descendants cleared2011: 12 descendants cleared2010: 5 descendants cleared2002: 1 descendant cleared2015: 15 descendants cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2004: 2 descendants cleared2008: 2 descendants cleared2013: 18 descendants cleared2009: 2 descendants cleared2020: 27 descendants cleared2021: 27 descendants cleared2024: 27 descendants cleared2019: 15 descendants cleared2026: 24 descendants cleared2023: 21 descendants cleared2022: 20 descendants cleared2016: 12 descendants cleared2025: 29 descendants cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK933785 Next Generation Knee SystemZimmer, Inc. · 1995
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 293 of its ownK023211 Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Cruciate Retaining (CR)-Flex Femoral…Zimmer, Inc. · 2002 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 197 of its ownK060370 Nexgen Knee Gender Solutions Female (GSF) Femoral ComponentsZimmer, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 193 of its ownK031061 Nexgen Porous, Uncemented Femoral and Tibial Baseplate ComponentsZimmer, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 123 of its ownK070214 Gender Solutions Natural-Knee Flex SystemZimmer, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 122 of its ownK070695 Zimmer Patellofemoral Joint ProsthesisZimmer, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 328 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2002: 12003: 12004: 22005: 22006: 12007: 62008: 22009: 22010: 52011: 122012: 162013: 182014: 192015: 152016: 122017: 122018: 122019: 152020: 272021: 272022: 202023: 212024: 272025: 292026: 24
2002high 29 (2025) · low 1 (2002)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 328 · See all
  • K023211Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Cruciate Retaining (CR)-Flex Femoral ComponentsZimmer, Inc. · 2002 · cites it directly293descendants
  • K060370Nexgen Knee Gender Solutions Female (GSF) Femoral ComponentsZimmer, Inc. · 2006 · 2 generations on197descendants
  • K031061Nexgen Porous, Uncemented Femoral and Tibial Baseplate ComponentsZimmer, Inc. · 2003 · cites it directly193descendants
  • K070214Gender Solutions Natural-Knee Flex SystemZimmer, Inc. · 2007 · 3 generations on123descendants
  • K070695Zimmer Patellofemoral Joint ProsthesisZimmer, Inc. · 2007 · 3 generations on122descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K933785Next Generation Knee SystemZimmer, Inc.1995—
+1K023211Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Cruciate Retaining (CR)-Flex Femoral ComponentsZimmer, Inc.20026
+2K060370Nexgen Knee Gender Solutions Female (GSF) Femoral ComponentsZimmer, Inc.200617
+1K031061Nexgen Porous, Uncemented Femoral and Tibial Baseplate ComponentsZimmer, Inc.200324
+3K070214Gender Solutions Natural-Knee Flex SystemZimmer, Inc.200763
+3K070695Zimmer Patellofemoral Joint ProsthesisZimmer, Inc.20075

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
200310
200420
200520
200610
200760
200820
200920
201050
2011120
2012160
2013180
2014190
2015150
2016120
2017120
2018120
2019150
2020270
2021270
2022200
2023210
2024270
2025290
2026240
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K933785, 1995–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JWH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JWH device

  1. #1 K221479 Persona Personalized Knee Systemscore 22.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (328)

See all 328

15 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K023211Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Cruciate Retaining (CR)-Flex Femoral ComponentsZimmer, Inc.2002293
K031061Nexgen Porous, Uncemented Femoral and Tibial Baseplate ComponentsZimmer, Inc.2003193
K101433Depuy Attune Knee SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2010114
K072281Nexgen Prolong All-Poly PatellaZimmer, Inc.200797
K113369Zimmer Persona Knee SystemZimmer, Inc.201296
K043101Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Mis Tibial Components, Locking Screw and Stem ExtensionsZimmer, Inc.200559
K103756Depuy Attune Total Knee SystemDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.20117
K052879Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Mis Modular Tibial Plates and KeelsZimmer, Inc.20056
K173057Zimmer Knee Joint Replacement Prostheses MR LabelingZimmer, Inc.20185
K133737Zimmer (R) Persona the Personalized Kee System 14X +30MM Tapered Stem ExtensionZimmer, Inc.20145

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1039-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1041-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1040-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1038-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1042-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Apr 28, 2017Class IIZ-2115-2017Under Investigation by firmZimmer Biomet is conducting a lot-specific medical device field action for two lots of the NexGen Offset Stem Extension implants. Product complaints indicated that the size etched on the part and labeled on the product packaging were…
Jan 11, 2016Class IIZ-1147-2016PackagingAs a result of the insufficient sealer calibration data for product packaged in firm's Building II between August 2010 and April 2013. The affected products are sterile.
Jan 11, 2016Class IIZ-1151-2016PackagingAs a result of the insufficient sealer calibration data for product packaged in firm's Building II between August 2010 and April 2013. The affected products are sterile.
Jan 11, 2016Class IIZ-0835-2016Process controlLDPE bag containing the implant adheres to the highly polished implant surface.
Jan 11, 2016Class IIZ-1159-2016PackagingAs a result of the insufficient sealer calibration data for product packaged in firm's Building II between August 2010 and April 2013. The affected products are sterile.
Dec 3, 2015Class IIZ-0590-2016Labeling mix-upsA product complaint was received stating that a carton labeled as a Precoat Stemmed Tibia Size 3 was opened for use and the contents were a non-augmented Stemmed Tibia Plate size 3.
Dec 2, 2015Class IIZ-0449-2016PackagingComplaints were received from Thailand reporting that there was no white paper (Tyvek) seal on the inner package of P/N:00-5980-037-01 unit from lot #62460264
Jul 22, 2014Class IIZ-2552-2014Package design/selectionZimmer is recalling sterile-packaged implants and instruments packaged in six different package configurations due to packaging design verification test failures. Specifically, multiple test samples from each of the six configurations…
Oct 31, 2013Class IIZ-0480-2014Device DesignTwo complaints were received in which it was reported that the stem would not lock into the tibia. Evaluation of the returned device found that the stemmed portion of the tibial plate would not hold the stem as the connection was too…
Oct 11, 2013Class IIZ-1023-2014PackagingZimmer recently conducted a review of all historic packaging validations at its Zimmer Manufacturing B.V. (ZMBV) facility in Ponce, Puerto Rico. Based on this review, it was determined that the packaging operations conducted in the…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1571-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1603-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1604-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1557-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1605-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1555-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1594-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1589-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1587-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1558-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1583-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1585-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1556-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1598-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1554-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1591-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1596-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1559-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1579-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1566-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1570-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1597-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1578-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1601-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1606-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1547-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1552-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1564-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1577-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1548-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1593-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1590-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1568-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1600-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…
Feb 24, 2012Not classifiedZ-1574-2012Labeling designZimmer has received 5 complaints where a NexGen CR micro articular surface was used with a standard CR femur, even though the compatibility chart and product labeling indicates that these components are NOT compatible. Investigation…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K023211 (Zimmer, Inc., 2002) has gone furthest, with 293 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All JWH devices

JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · JWH

20in 2025

2007: 182008: 172009: 112010: 192011: 252012: 332013: 312014: 332015: 272016: 182017: 252018: 252019: 282020: 222021: 242022: 172023: 202024: 192025: 202026 (partial year): 12
2007high 33 (2012) · low 11 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JWH

55in 2025

2007: 74 days median2008: 81 days median2009: 168 days median2010: 85 days median2011: 87 days median2012: 85 days median2013: 128 days median2014: 98 days median2015: 87 days median2016: 88 days median2017: 118 days median2018: 90 days median2019: 133 days median2020: 59 days median2021: 61 days median2022: 56 days median2023: 57 days median2024: 89 days median2025: 55 days median2026 (partial year): 63 days median
2007high 168 (2009) · low 55 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JWH

2in 2025

2007: 142008: 102009: 1092010: 322011: 272012: 852013: 312014: 132015: 112016: 172017: 612018: 142019: 52020: 22021: 82022: 122023: 672024: 72025: 22026 (partial year): 4
2007high 109 (2009) · low 2 (2020)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JWH

9,306in 2025

2007: 1,3052008: 1,4832009: 1,8702010: 3,2862011: 5,1332012: 5,2032013: 6,1352014: 6,7222015: 6,8812016: 7,5862017: 12,2632018: 14,0712019: 14,9872020: 12,5922021: 9,4082022: 8,3642023: 8,9472024: 10,8282025: 9,306
2007high 14,987 (2019) · low 1,305 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JWH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071874141,305
20081781101,483
2009111681091,870
20101985323,286
20112587275,133
20123385855,203
201331128316,135
20143398136,722
20152787116,881
20161888177,586
2017251186112,263
201825901414,071
201928133514,987
20202259212,592
2021246189,408
20221756128,364
20232057678,947
20241989710,828
2025205529,306
202612634—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K933785: Next Generation Knee System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K933785

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026