510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Laser Alignment Tool

K943381510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 9, 199427-day reviewClass I21 CFR 892.5780

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Philips Medical Systems North America, Inc. · IWE Monitor, Patient Position, Light-Beam

Cleared on Aug 9, 1994 as substantially equivalent to K933431 (Trac Medical, Inc., 1993) after a 27-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1993. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Aug 9, 1994
Review
27 days
Class
Class I
Product code
IWE
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K933431 (1993). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2015: 1 descendant clearedK933431 · Orthotrac Coaxial Laser · Trac Medical, Inc. · 19931990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K933431 · Orthotrac Coaxial Laser · Trac Medical, Inc. · 19930
  1. Root · 1 generation backK933431 Orthotrac Coaxial LaserTrac Medical, Inc. · 1993
  2. This deviceK943381 Laser Alignment ToolPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc. · 1994
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK152303 CT Sim Laser SystemGammex, Inc. · 2015

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K152303CT Sim Laser SystemGammex, Inc. · 2015 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K933431Orthotrac Coaxial LaserTrac Medical, Inc.1993—
0 (this device)K943381Laser Alignment ToolPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc.1994—
+1K152303CT Sim Laser SystemGammex, Inc.2015—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K943381, 1993–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IWE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K933431Orthotrac Coaxial Laser
Summary page 1
…d ofinitially aligning it Predicate Device : Orthotrac Coaxial Laser TRAC Medical Systems K933431 - 05 Oct. 1993 Intended Use Statement: The laser alignment tool is used for patient positioning on our BV series M…
Trac Medical, Inc.1993—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K152303CT Sim Laser SystemGammex, Inc.20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K152303 (Gammex, Inc., 2015) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All IWE devices

IWE Monitor, Patient Position, Light-Beam: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IWE

1in 2015

2015: 1
2007high 1 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IWE

Too few IWE 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · IWE

1in 2025

2009: 12011: 22023: 22025: 1
2007high 2 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IWE

1in 2018

2009: 12015: 12018: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IWE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—11
20100—00
20110—20
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20151—01
20160—00
20170—00
20180—01
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—20
20240—00
20250—10
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The laser alignment tool is used for patient positioning on our BV series Mobile Fluoroscopic X-Ray Systems. The current procedure is to use fluoroscopic x-ray exposure to correctly position the patient relative to the central x-ray beam. By providing a visible indicator of the central beam location, patient positioning is facilitated for the surgeon while x-ray dose is reduced for the patient. Clinical applications include situations in which the…

Read the full statement (211 words)

The laser alignment tool is used for patient positioning on our BV series Mobile Fluoroscopic X-Ray Systems. The current procedure is to use fluoroscopic x-ray exposure to correctly position the patient relative to the central x-ray beam. By providing a visible indicator of the central beam location, patient positioning is facilitated for the surgeon while x-ray dose is reduced for the patient. Clinical applications include situations in which the surgeon utilized the x-ray beam for alignment or guidance in a procedure The procedures themselves would not be altered with the exception of the use of the visible spectrum to indicate alignment rather than fluoroscopic shadows. The system consists of a HeNe laser device and an optical guide which allows the light to be emitted long the central axis of the x-ray beam. A means is provided to physically align the beam. The laser alignment tool is an accessory used to visualize the location of the central axis of the x-ray beam whether or not x-rays are energized. It has no clinical value beyond the surgeon's use of that visualization. It does not enable new treatments nor generate information which is not available through other means. The accuracy of the visualization is wholly demonstrable through the use of bench testing and specification.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K943381: Laser Alignment Tool.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K943381

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026