510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Gore-Tex Regenerative Material Titanium Reinforced Configurations

K960292510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 15, 199684-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3930

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · NPK Barrier, Synthetic, Intraoral

Cleared on Apr 15, 1996 after an 84-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 8 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 15, 1996
Review
84 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NPK
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

8 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2015: 2 descendants cleared1997: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK960292 Gore-Tex Regenerative Material Titanium Reinforced ConfigurationsW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · 1996
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 7 of its ownK972278 Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co. · 1997 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK143327 Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd. · 2015
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK201187 Cytoplast Titanium-Reinforced PTFE MembranesOsteogenics Biomedical, Inc. · 2021
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK091120 Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc. · 2010
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK221851 Lumina-PTFE TitaniumCriteria Industria E Comercio DE Produtos Medicinais · 2023

Showing 5 of 8 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1997: 12010: 12011: 12015: 22021: 12022: 12023: 1
1997high 2 (2015) · low 0 (1998)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 8 · See all
  • K972278Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co. · 1997 · cites it directly7descendants
  • K143327Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd. · 2015 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K201187Cytoplast Titanium-Reinforced PTFE MembranesOsteogenics Biomedical, Inc. · 2021 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K091120Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc. · 2010 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K221851Lumina-PTFE TitaniumCriteria Industria E Comercio DE Produtos Medicinais · 2023 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K960292Gore-Tex Regenerative Material Titanium Reinforced ConfigurationsW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.1996—
+1K972278Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co.19971
+1K143327Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd.2015—
+2K201187Cytoplast Titanium-Reinforced PTFE MembranesOsteogenics Biomedical, Inc.2021—
+2K091120Medpor Contain ImplantPorex Surgical, Inc.2010—
+3K221851Lumina-PTFE TitaniumCriteria Industria E Comercio DE Produtos Medicinais2023—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
201010
201110
201520
202110
202210
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K960292, 1996–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NPK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NPK device

  1. #1 K221851 Lumina-PTFE Titaniumscore 7.4 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—GORE-TEX Periodontal Material -- Titanium Reinforced Configurations
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (8)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K972278Cytoplast Regentex Titanium 250Osteogenics Co.19977
K143327Neoss Ti Reinforced MembraneNeoss, Ltd.20152

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K972278 (Osteogenics Co., 1997) has gone furthest, with 7 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All NPK devices

NPK Barrier, Synthetic, Intraoral: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · NPK

3in 2023

2009: 12010: 22011: 12013: 12015: 22016: 12017: 12021: 12022: 12023: 3
2007high 3 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NPK

529in 2023

2023: 529 days median
2007high 529 (2023)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NPK

No recall names NPK since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · NPK

3in 2022

2008: 12009: 22010: 132011: 352012: 172013: 62014: 12017: 12020: 12021: 22022: 3
2007high 35 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NPK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20091—02
20102—013
20111—035
20120—017
20131—06
20140—01
20152—00
20161—00
20171—01
20180—00
20190—00
20200—01
20211—02
20221—03
2023352900
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

GORE-TEX Regenerative Material is intended to provide a mechanism for the ingrowth of new hard and soft tissues into bony defects surrounding teeth and to augment ingrowth of hard and soft tissues on alveolar ridges. GORE-TEX Regenerative Material is a passive, non-load bearing material. Itis NOT intended for use in load bearing, articulating situations such as temporal mandibular joint reconstruction.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K960292: Gore-Tex Regenerative Material Titanium Reinforced Configurations.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K960292

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026