510(k) · Cleared
ClearedEndoscopic Clip Applier
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Aesculap, Inc. · OCW Endoscopic Tissue Approximation Device
Cleared on Sep 11, 1996 after a 77-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 3 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Sep 11, 1996
- Review
- 77 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- OCW
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.
- This deviceK962493 Endoscopic Clip ApplierAesculap, Inc. · 1996
- Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK080753 Aesculap Endoscopic Clip SytemAesculap, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK102081 Endoscopic Clip SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2010 · Recalled
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK081031 Endoscopic Clip Appliers with Clip MagazineAesculap, Inc. · 2008
Most influential descendants
Showing 3 of 3 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | K962493 | Endoscopic Clip Applier | Aesculap, Inc. | 1996 | — |
| +1 | K080753 | Aesculap Endoscopic Clip Sytem | Aesculap, Inc. | 2008 | 2 |
| +2 | K102081 | Endoscopic Clip System | Aesculap, Inc. | 2010 | 2 |
| +1 | K081031 | Endoscopic Clip Appliers with Clip Magazine | Aesculap, Inc. | 2008 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in OCW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new OCW device
- #1 K252400 Endomina EZFuse systemscore 12.0 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | — | Endoscopic clip appliers and implantable clips by Baxter Named without a submission number | |
| * | — | Endoscopic clip appliers and implantable clips by Ethicon Named without a submission number | |
| * | — | Endoscopic clip appliers and implantable clips by Horizon Surgical Named without a submission number | |
| * | — | Endoscopic clip appliers and implantable clips by U.S. Surgical Named without a submission number |
What descends from it? (3)
2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K080753 (Aesculap, Inc., 2008) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
How does its category compare?
All OCW devicesOCW Endoscopic Tissue Approximation Device: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · OCW
1in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · OCW
133in 2023
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · OCW
3so far in 2026, the most since 2007
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · OCW
326in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code OCW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 9 |
| 2008 | 4 | 70 | 0 | 47 |
| 2009 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 30 |
| 2010 | 4 | 91 | 0 | 10 |
| 2011 | 1 | — | 0 | 16 |
| 2012 | 1 | — | 0 | 28 |
| 2013 | 2 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 28 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 59 |
| 2016 | 2 | — | 0 | 74 |
| 2017 | 2 | — | 0 | 420 |
| 2018 | 2 | — | 0 | 413 |
| 2019 | 1 | — | 0 | 291 |
| 2020 | 1 | — | 0 | 183 |
| 2021 | 3 | 221 | 0 | 198 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 235 |
| 2023 | 3 | 133 | 1 | 227 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 211 |
| 2025 | 1 | — | 0 | 326 |
| 2026 | 2 | — | 3 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The devices presented in this submission are intended for use in endoscopic surgery for ligating and marking vessels and tubular structures.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K962493 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K962493: Endoscopic Clip Applier.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K962493
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026