510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Microject Model Pca-1

K965222510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 19, 1997170-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5725

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Microject, Inc. · MEB Pump, Infusion, Elastomeric

Cleared on Jun 19, 1997 after a 170-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jun 19, 1997
Review
170 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MEB
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2005: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK965222 Microject Model Pca-1Microject, Inc. · 1997
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK052221 Ambit Push & Play Ambulatory Infusion PumpSorenson Medical, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K052221Ambit Push & Play Ambulatory Infusion PumpSorenson Medical, Inc. · 2005 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K965222Microject Model Pca-1Microject, Inc.1997—
+1K052221Ambit Push & Play Ambulatory Infusion PumpSorenson Medical, Inc.20054

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K965222, 1997–2005Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MEB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MEB device

  1. #1 K250234 SMARTeZ™ Elastomeric Infusion Pump (RS series)score 14.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K052221Ambit Push & Play Ambulatory Infusion PumpSorenson Medical, Inc.20050

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K052221 (Sorenson Medical, Inc., 2005) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MEB devices

MEB Pump, Infusion, Elastomeric: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MEB

2in 2024

2007: 52008: 22009: 12013: 12014: 12016: 12019: 12024: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 5 (2007) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MEB

42in 2007

2007: 42 days median
2007high 42 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MEB

17in 2018

2007: 12008: 32009: 482010: 22011: 8, 1 Class I2013: 2, 1 Class I2018: 17
2007high 48 (2009) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MEB

1,408in 2025

2007: 1102008: 4442009: 7982010: 1,8272011: 2,2652012: 1,9762013: 1,9562014: 2,6952015: 2,9802016: 2,1472017: 1,6532018: 1,4732019: 9742020: 2,7322021: 1,8022022: 1,2882023: 1,2482024: 1,4242025: 1,408
2007high 2,980 (2015) · low 110 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MEB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075421110
20082—3444
20091—48798
20100—21,827
20110—8 (1)2,265
20120—01,976
20131—2 (1)1,956
20141—02,695
20150—02,980
20161—02,147
20170—01,653
20180—171,473
20191—0974
20200—02,732
20210—01,802
20220—01,288
20230—01,248
20242—01,424
20250—01,408
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The indications for use of the MicroJect Model PCA-1 Driver is in the field of pain manggement. The Driver and associated, sterile Cassettes have been designed for the infusion of medications which are used to control pain. In addition to use by health care professionals, it is also indicated to be used by the patient for infusion of pain medications on an as-needed basis (patient controlled analgesia). The system is indicated for infusion of pain medications into intravenous, subcutaneous, and epidural access routes from standard drug containers, including flexible solution bags and syringes.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K965222: Microject Model Pca-1.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K965222

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026