510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2026

Connecta Plus 1 and Connecta Plus 3 2-Way and 3-Way Stopcocks

K974083510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 13, 199876-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5440Recalls 13

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ohmeda Medical · FMG Stopcock, I.V. Set

Cleared on Jan 13, 1998 after a 76-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 13 times.

Decided
Jan 13, 1998
Review
76 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FMG
Recalls
13
Predicates
0

2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2007: 1 descendant cleared2001: 1 descendant cleared1995200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK974083 Connecta Plus 1 and Connecta Plus 3 2-Way and 3-Way StopcocksOhmeda Medical · 1998
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK070143 JMS Planecta StopcockJms North America Corp. · 2007
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK012157 Churchill Medical Systems StopcockChurchill Medical Systems, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K070143JMS Planecta StopcockJms North America Corp. · 2007 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K012157Churchill Medical Systems StopcockChurchill Medical Systems, Inc. · 2001 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K974083Connecta Plus 1 and Connecta Plus 3 2-Way and 3-Way StopcocksOhmeda Medical1998—
+1K070143JMS Planecta StopcockJms North America Corp.2007—
+1K012157Churchill Medical Systems StopcockChurchill Medical Systems, Inc.20011

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110
200710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K974083, 1998–2007Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FMG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FMG device

  1. #1 K242255 Qitexio® 4-Way Stopcock (QIT014)score 10.5 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Connecta® TH (through hole) 2-way and 3-way Infusion/Pressure Monitoring Stopcocks
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K070143JMS Planecta StopcockJms North America Corp.20070
K012157Churchill Medical Systems StopcockChurchill Medical Systems, Inc.20010

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 21, 2026Class IIZ-2514-2026Device DesignDue to stopcock issues when using the plastic luer-lok syringe, the connection at the Port C may over thread or continue to spin rather than tightening securely. This behavior has led some clinical users to perceive the connection as…
Feb 20, 2025Class IIZ-1509-2025Labeling Change ControlDue to specific lots of luer-lok devices were shipped to the U.S. market with an Outside US Instruction for Use (IFU)
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1439-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1434-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1436-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1433-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1441-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1432-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1437-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1435-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1431-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1440-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.
May 9, 2022Class IIZ-1438-2022Under Investigation by firmMay have the potential for leakage at the housing component of the stopcock, may result in delay or interruption in treatment, exposure to infusate and biohazardous material, under dosing/under infusion, contamination and/or air ingress.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K070143 (Jms North America Corp., 2007) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All FMG devices

FMG Stopcock, I.V. Set: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FMG

1in 2025

2007: 22008: 22009: 22013: 22014: 12018: 12019: 22022: 22023: 22025: 1
2007high 2 (2007) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FMG

Too few FMG 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · FMG

33in 2025

2007: 52008: 42010: 22011: 82016: 12017: 22018: 32020: 52025: 33, 1 Class I2026 (partial year): 3
2007high 33 (2025) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FMG

868in 2025

2007: 262008: 482009: 272010: 1312011: 952012: 932013: 1172014: 1052015: 962016: 1482017: 1142018: 1642019: 4002020: 2842021: 2452022: 2802023: 6892024: 9352025: 868
2007high 935 (2024) · low 26 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FMG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—526
20082—448
20092—027
20100—2131
20110—895
20120—093
20132—0117
20141—0105
20150—096
20160—1148
20170—2114
20181—3164
20192—0400
20200—5284
20210—0245
20222—0280
20232—0689
20240—0935
20251—33 (1)868
20260—3—

What is it indicated for?

Connecta® Plus 1 and Connecta® Plus 3 2-way and 3-way Stopcocks are control valves for use in I.V. therapy and hemodynamic pressure monitoring. They are added to IV cannula or extension tubing sets for simultaneous or alternate administration of IV drugs, fluids, and blood, or for blood sampling. They can also be used in areas in which solution flow requires control. Alternatively, they are used for hemodynamic monitoring via an arterial cannula and a central venous catheter.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K974083: Connecta Plus 1 and Connecta Plus 3 2-Way and 3-Way Stopcocks.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K974083

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026