510(k) · Cleared
ClearedUltima Acetabular Roof Reinforcement Ring
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Johnson & Johnson Professionals, Inc. · JDI Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented
Cleared on Apr 3, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K953578 (Intermedics Orthopedics, 1995) after a 67-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995.
- Decided
- Apr 3, 1998
- Review
- 67 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- JDI
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K953578 (1995). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK953578 Protek Acetabular Roof Reinforcement RingIntermedics Orthopedics · 1995
- This deviceK980286 Ultima Acetabular Roof Reinforcement RingJohnson & Johnson Professionals, Inc. · 1998
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K953578 | Protek Acetabular Roof Reinforcement Ring | Intermedics Orthopedics | 1995 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K980286 | Ultima Acetabular Roof Reinforcement Ring | Johnson & Johnson Professionals, Inc. | 1998 | — |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in JDI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new JDI device
- #1 K253515 Zimmer Biomet OSS™ Orthopedic Salvage System…score 15.2 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K953578 | Protek Acetabular Roof Reinforcement RingSummary page 2…of Reinforcement Ring is substantially equivalent in terms of intended use, materials, design, sterilization method, and packaging to the Protek Roof Reinforcement Ring (K953578). The determination of substantial equivalence for this device was based on a detailed device description and conformance with… | 1995 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Its one ancestor has no recall.
- 2 other devices also cite its predicate K953578.
How does its category compare?
All JDI devicesJDI Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · JDI
1in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · JDI
59in 2024
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · JDI
1in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · JDI
1,644in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code JDI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 3 | 81 | 26 | 696 |
| 2008 | 5 | 96 | 6 | 810 |
| 2009 | 3 | 65 | 3 | 964 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 3 | 2,040 |
| 2011 | 2 | — | 5 | 3,160 |
| 2012 | 4 | 167 | 4 | 5,122 |
| 2013 | 3 | 176 | 11 | 5,206 |
| 2014 | 3 | 98 | 3 | 4,968 |
| 2015 | 3 | 190 | 1 | 4,906 |
| 2016 | 4 | 166 | 5 | 3,995 |
| 2017 | 1 | — | 5 | 6,135 |
| 2018 | 1 | — | 1 | 6,728 |
| 2019 | 2 | — | 1 | 7,407 |
| 2020 | 7 | 247 | 77 | 4,015 |
| 2021 | 3 | 162 | 0 | 3,170 |
| 2022 | 3 | 69 | 0 | 1,978 |
| 2023 | 2 | — | 0 | 1,635 |
| 2024 | 3 | 59 | 0 | 1,821 |
| 2025 | 1 | — | 1 | 1,644 |
| 2026 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The ULTIMA® Acetabular Roof Reinforcement Ring is indicated for use in total hip replacement procedures for patients suffering severe pain and disability due to structural damage in the hip joint from rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, collagen disorders, avascular necrosis, and nonunion of femoral fractures. Use of the prosthesis is also indicated for patients with congenital hip dysplasia, protrusio acetabuli, slipped…
Read the full statement (107 words)
The ULTIMA® Acetabular Roof Reinforcement Ring is indicated for use in total hip replacement procedures for patients suffering severe pain and disability due to structural damage in the hip joint from rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, collagen disorders, avascular necrosis, and nonunion of femoral fractures. Use of the prosthesis is also indicated for patients with congenital hip dysplasia, protrusio acetabuli, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and disability due to previous fusion, where bone stock is inadequate for other reconstructive techniques.
The Ultma® Acetabular Roof Reinforcement Ring is secured in the prepared acetabulumn using a combination of Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement, bone allograft, and cancellous screws to provide stabilization.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K980286 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K980286: Ultima Acetabular Roof Reinforcement Ring.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K980286
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026