510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Viewpoint Tools- Sterrad

K983764510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 8, 1999255-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Jul 8, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K963221 (Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc., 1997) and 1 other predicate after a 255-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1991.

Decided
Jul 8, 1999
Review
255 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HAW
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K905070 (1991). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK905070 VistarPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1991
  2. 3 generations backK961168 ViewpointPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1996
  3. 2 generations backK963221 Optical Digitizer Option for View PointPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1997
  4. 1 generation backK970604 Viewpoint - 3.0 SoftwarePhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1997
  5. This deviceK983764 Viewpoint Tools- SterradPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K905070VistarPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1991—
−3K961168ViewpointPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1996—
−2K963221Optical Digitizer Option for View PointPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1997—
−1K970604Viewpoint - 3.0 SoftwarePhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1997—
0 (this device)K983764Viewpoint Tools- SterradPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
199610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983764, 1991–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HAW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HAW device

  1. #1 K253856 Geniant Cranial (Navigated Neurosurgical…score 15.0 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K963221Optical Digitizer Option for View Point
Summary page 2
…he accuracy or function of the tools. The Guide Blocks and the Trackable Awl described in this submission are equivalent to the tools described in the 510(k) submissions K963221 and K970604. This equivalence is demonstrated in the following table. Substantial Equivalence Table Parameter ViewPoint - Ste…
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1997—
*K970604Viewpoint - 3.0 Software
Summary page 2
…or function of the tools. The Guide Blocks and the Trackable Awl described in this submission are equivalent to the tools described in the 510(k) submissions K963221 and K970604. This equivalence is demonstrated in the following table. Substantial Equivalence Table Parameter ViewPoint - Sterrad Predic…
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1997—

Also cleared against K963221: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 2.1 years on median.
  • 1 of the 6 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K963221.

How does its category compare?

All HAW devices

HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HAW

9in 2025

2007: 152008: 122009: 82010: 62011: 42012: 82013: 32014: 52015: 102016: 92017: 72018: 62019: 102020: 52021: 92022: 72023: 142024: 72025: 92026 (partial year): 5
2007high 15 (2007) · low 3 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HAW

163in 2025

2007: 107 days median2008: 112 days median2009: 221 days median2010: 138 days median2011: 66 days median2012: 178 days median2013: 172 days median2014: 238 days median2015: 232 days median2016: 175 days median2017: 226 days median2018: 112 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 168 days median2022: 128 days median2023: 142 days median2024: 107 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 162 days median
2007high 238 (2014) · low 66 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HAW

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 102009: 62010: 282011: 52012: 42013: 6, 1 Class I2014: 52015: 32016: 52017: 22018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 4, 1 Class I2020: 12021: 4, 2 Class I2022: 12023: 4, 1 Class I2024: 2, 2 Class I2025: 22026 (partial year): 6
2007high 28 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (9 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HAW

3,425in 2025

2007: 492008: 532009: 962010: 2992011: 1,7252012: 9862013: 1,2902014: 1,6062015: 1,7672016: 1,8282017: 3,5052018: 4,4392019: 6,0622020: 3,4802021: 2,8272022: 1,9292023: 2,5102024: 3,7552025: 3,425
2007high 6,062 (2019) · low 49 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715107249
2008121121053
20098221696
2010613828299
201146651,725
201281784986
201331726 (1)1,290
2014523851,606
20151023231,767
2016917551,828
2017722623,505
201861122 (2)4,439
2019101474 (1)6,062
202058813,480
202191684 (2)2,827
2022712811,929
2023141424 (1)2,510
202471072 (2)3,755
2025916323,425
202651626—

What is it indicated for?

The ViewPoint is intended for use as a device which uses diagnostic images of the patient acquired specifically to assist the physician with presurgical planning and to provide orientation and reference information during intra-operative procedures.

The ViewPoint is indicated for use in:

« Intra-cranial surgical procedures involving space occupying lesions or malformations (including soft tissue, vascular and osseous)

» Spinal surgical procedures involving spinal stabilization, neural decompression, or resection of spinal neoplasms.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983764: Viewpoint Tools- Sterrad.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983764

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026