510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Opmi Twiner Surgical Microscope

K983868510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 29, 199988-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Carl Zeiss, Inc. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Jan 29, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K900077 (Sharplan Lasers, Inc., 1990) and 1 other predicate after an 88-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1990.

Decided
Jan 29, 1999
Review
88 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K900077 (1990). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1997: 1 other ancestorK900077 · Sharplan 1041 Sealed-Off CO2 Surgical Laser System · Sharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1990199019921994199619982000
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K900077 · Sharplan 1041 Sealed-Off CO2 Surgical Laser System · Sharplan Lasers, Inc. · 19900
  1. Root · 1 generation backK900077 Sharplan 1041 Sealed-Off CO2 Surgical Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1990
  2. This deviceK983868 Opmi Twiner Surgical MicroscopeCarl Zeiss, Inc. · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K900077Sharplan 1041 Sealed-Off CO2 Surgical Laser SystemSharplan Lasers, Inc.1990—
0 (this device)K983868Opmi Twiner Surgical MicroscopeCarl Zeiss, Inc.1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K983868, 1990–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K900077Sharplan 1041 Sealed-Off CO2 Surgical Laser System
Summary page 1
…ation Name: Surgical Microscope: § 878.4700 Instrument, Surgical Powered, Laser: § 878.4810 We are claiming substantial equivalence to the Sharplan Laser, Inc.’s 1041s (K900077) and the Premier Centauri Laser System (K933841) predicate devices, which already have pre-market clearance. The OPMI® TwinER Su…
Sharplan Lasers, Inc.1990—
*K933841Centauri
Summary page 1
…rument, Surgical Powered, Laser: § 878.4810 We are claiming substantial equivalence to the Sharplan Laser, Inc.’s 1041s (K900077) and the Premier Centauri Laser System (K933841) predicate devices, which already have pre-market clearance. The OPMI® TwinER Surgical Microscope is a surgical microscope with…
Premier Laser Systems, Inc.1997—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

This device will be used in the same manner as all; (2) surgical microscopes are used and (b) as all lasers are used in ENT and general surgery not requiring photocoagulation. The device is primarily intended to allow surgeons to perform tissue ablation with minimal peripheral thermal effects. More specifically, the device can be used for: general surgery which does not require photocoagulation; and in ENT applications, including microsurgery in the…

Read the full statement (136 words)

This device will be used in the same manner as all; (2) surgical microscopes are used and (b) as all lasers are used in ENT and general surgery not requiring photocoagulation. The device is primarily intended to allow surgeons to perform tissue ablation with minimal peripheral thermal effects. More specifically, the device can be used for: general surgery which does not require photocoagulation; and in ENT applications, including microsurgery in the middle ear, stapedoplasty, for preparation of sites for osteosynthesis, microsurgery on ossicles, tympanic membrane, ablative surgery on soft tissues (for example: ligament severance of the stapes muscle), and removal of exostosis.

This device is intended for use primarily by physicians and health care workers and may only be used under the supervision of a physician. This device will not be sold to the general public.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K983868: Opmi Twiner Surgical Microscope.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K983868

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026