510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Reticone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry Systems

K990327510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 26, 199983-day reviewClass II21 CFR 864.5220

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Coulter Corp. · GKZ Counter, Differential Cell

Cleared on Apr 26, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K872166 (Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic, 1987) and 1 other predicate after an 83-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1987.

Decided
Apr 26, 1999
Review
83 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GKZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K872166 (1987). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1988: 1 other ancestorK872166 · Facscan Flow Cytometer - Reticcount Reti. Enu. Kit · Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic · 19871985199019952000
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K872166 · Facscan Flow Cytometer - Reticcount Reti. Enu. Kit · Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic · 19870
  1. Root · 1 generation backK872166 Facscan Flow Cytometer - Reticcount Reti. Enu. KitBd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic · 1987
  2. This deviceK990327 Reticone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry SystemsCoulter Corp. · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K872166Facscan Flow Cytometer - Reticcount Reti. Enu. KitBd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic1987—
0 (this device)K990327Reticone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry SystemsCoulter Corp.1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K990327, 1987–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GKZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GKZ device

  1. #1 K250943 Sysmex XR-Series (XR-10) Automated Hematology…score 13.2 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K872166Facscan Flow Cytometer - Reticcount Reti. Enu. Kit
Summary page 1
…and allows identification and enumeration of reticulocyte percentage and absolute count. Substantial Equivalence: Product Differences: 510(k) Premarket Notification: K872166 Retic-COUNT™ (Thiazole Orange*) Reagent 510(k) Premarket Notification: K880636 Retic-COUNT™ Reticulocyte Enumeration Software T…
Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic1987—
*K880636Reticcount Software
Summary page 1
…te count. Substantial Equivalence: Product Differences: 510(k) Premarket Notification: K872166 Retic-COUNT™ (Thiazole Orange*) Reagent 510(k) Premarket Notification: K880636 Retic-COUNT™ Reticulocyte Enumeration Software The reticONE™ SYSTEM and Retic-COUNT™ are essentially identical with respect to f…
Bd Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Preanalytic19881

Also cleared against K872166: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K872166.

How does its category compare?

All GKZ devices

GKZ Counter, Differential Cell: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GKZ

4in 2025

2007: 62008: 62009: 62010: 42011: 32012: 32013: 12014: 32015: 32016: 32017: 42018: 32019: 52020: 12022: 32023: 42024: 32025: 42026 (partial year): 4
2007high 6 (2007) · low 0 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GKZ

108in 2025

2007: 117 days median2008: 99 days median2009: 147 days median2010: 290 days median2011: 315 days median2012: 408 days median2014: 165 days median2015: 273 days median2016: 198 days median2017: 280 days median2018: 270 days median2019: 210 days median2022: 638 days median2023: 329 days median2024: 157 days median2025: 108 days median2026 (partial year): 254 days median
2007high 638 (2022) · low 99 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GKZ

1in 2025

2007: 372008: 52009: 132010: 272011: 282012: 72013: 62015: 32016: 32017: 32018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 22020: 12022: 42023: 12025: 1
2007high 37 (2007) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GKZ

77in 2025

2007: 2682008: 9252009: 5592010: 8962011: 2,9052012: 2,9592013: 3,0702014: 3,1122015: 1,9722016: 3,3382017: 2292018: 4972019: 9082020: 3422021: 3912022: 1982023: 1552024: 1152025: 77
2007high 3,338 (2016) · low 77 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GKZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007611737268
20086995925
2009614713559
2010429027896
20113315282,905
2012340872,959
20131—63,070
2014316503,112
2015327331,972
2016319833,338
201742803229
201832702 (2)497
201952102908
20201—1342
20210—0391
202236384198
202343291155
202431570115
20254108177
202642540—

What is it indicated for?

The reticONE™ SYSTEM for EPICS® XL™ Flow Cytometry Systems combines a reagent Kit consisting of a Coriphosphine-O dye and a Biological Calibrator, and software for automated analysis of reticulocytes in whole blood using EPICS® XL™ Flow Cytometry Systems with SYSTEM II™ Software. The system is intended “For In Vitro Diagnostic Use” and allows identification and enumeration of reticulocyte percentage and absolute count. The reticulocyte count is…

Read the full statement (235 words)

The reticONE™ SYSTEM for EPICS® XL™ Flow Cytometry Systems combines a reagent Kit consisting of a Coriphosphine-O dye and a Biological Calibrator, and software for automated analysis of reticulocytes in whole blood using EPICS® XL™ Flow Cytometry Systems with SYSTEM II™ Software. The system is intended “For In Vitro Diagnostic Use” and allows identification and enumeration of reticulocyte percentage and absolute count.

The reticulocyte count is diagnostically useful in discriminating between normal and abnormal erythropoiesis. It can be useful in the diagnosis or detection of anemias, internal hemorrhaging, hemoglobinopathies and certain nutritional or vitamin deficiencies. Decreased or defective red cell production may result in a lower reticulocyte count such as in aplastic anemias. Elevated reticulocyte counts may be observed in clinical conditions where red cell destruction is increased (for example, hemolytic anemias and hypersplenism) or where there is increased red cell production (for example, erythropoietin drug therapy and a response to treated anemia).

Since the kidneys are a primary source of erythropoietin (a hormone that regulates erythroid development), the reticulocyte count is also affected in individuals with renal disease. In cases of renal atrophy, the reticulocyte count will be decreased. In cases of malignancy or hypersplenism, the reticulocyte count will be elevated.

Reticulocyte counts are also used as an indicator of bone marrow recovery following intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy or a bone marrow transplantation. Increased reticulocyte counts in these patients are indicative of bone marrow regeneration.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K990327: Reticone System for Epics XL Flow Cytometry Systems.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K990327

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026