510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Nycocard HBA1C Glycosylated Hemoglobin Assay

K993131510(k) TraditionalCleared May 22, 2000245-day reviewClass II21 CFR 864.7470

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Primus, Inc. · LCP Assay, Glycosylated Hemoglobin

Cleared on May 22, 2000 after a 245-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
May 22, 2000
Review
245 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LCP
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2012: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK993131 Nycocard HBA1C Glycosylated Hemoglobin AssayPrimus, Inc. · 2000
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK111128 Labonacheck A1CCeragem International, Inc. · 2012

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K111128Labonacheck A1CCeragem International, Inc. · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K993131Nycocard HBA1C Glycosylated Hemoglobin AssayPrimus, Inc.2000—
+1K111128Labonacheck A1CCeragem International, Inc.2012—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K993131, 2000–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LCP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LCP device

  1. #1 K221326 Nova Allegro HbA1c Assay, Nova Allegro Analyzerscore 9.6 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K111128Labonacheck A1CCeragem International, Inc.20120

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K111128 (Ceragem International, Inc., 2012) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LCP devices

LCP Assay, Glycosylated Hemoglobin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LCP

1in 2024

2007: 72008: 52009: 62010: 22011: 102012: 92013: 22014: 82015: 32016: 22017: 52018: 22019: 42020: 12023: 22024: 1
2007high 10 (2011) · low 0 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LCP

269in 2019

2007: 133 days median2008: 206 days median2009: 158 days median2011: 176 days median2012: 143 days median2014: 127 days median2015: 239 days median2017: 218 days median2019: 269 days median
2007high 269 (2019) · low 127 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LCP

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 32009: 62010: 52011: 512013: 42014: 22015: 22016: 62017: 12018: 12022: 12024: 12025: 1
2007high 51 (2011) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LCP

22in 2025

2007: 52008: 112009: 152010: 42011: 272012: 512013: 1932014: 1822015: 642016: 292017: 1492018: 1,9112019: 1142020: 132021: 72022: 82023: 272024: 392025: 22
2007high 1,911 (2018) · low 4 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LCP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007713315
20085206311
20096158615
20102—54
2011101765127
20129143051
20132—4193
201481272182
20153239264
20162—629
201752181149
20182—11,911
201942690114
20201—013
20210—07
20220—18
20232—027
20241—139
20250—122
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Measurement of Glycohemoglobin in blood.

In vitro diagnostic use only

NycoCard HbA Ic is a laboratory test intended for the quantitative determination of percent glycated hemoglobin in whole blood using the system to monitor long term blood glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus.

Conditions for use:

The measurement of glycohemoglobin has not been shown to be reliable in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Such use yields too many false negative and false positive results. (see Lester E. “The clinical value of glycated hemoglobin and glycated plasma proteins”. Ann Clin Biochem 19989;26:213-9)

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K993131: Nycocard HBA1C Glycosylated Hemoglobin Assay.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K993131

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026