510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cedia Dau Amphassure Assay

K994380510(k) TraditionalCleared May 2, 2000127-day reviewClass II21 CFR 862.3100

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Microgenics Corp. · DKZ Enzyme Immunoassay, Amphetamine

Cleared on May 2, 2000 as substantially equivalent to K883707 (Abbott Laboratories, 1988) after a 127-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1988.

Decided
May 2, 2000
Review
127 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DKZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K883707 (1988). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K883707 · TDX Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II · Abbott Laboratories · 19881985199019952000
  1. Root · 1 generation backK883707 TDX Amphetamine/Methamphetamine IIAbbott Laboratories · 1988
  2. This deviceK994380 Cedia Dau Amphassure AssayMicrogenics Corp. · 2000
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K883707TDX Amphetamine/Methamphetamine IIAbbott Laboratories1988—
0 (this device)K994380Cedia Dau Amphassure AssayMicrogenics Corp.2000—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K994380, 1988–2000Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DKZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DKZ device

  1. #1 K233019 AllTest Multi-Drug Rapid Test Cup; AllTest…score 14.6 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K883707TDX Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II
Summary page 1
…n of amphetamines in urine. Classification name: Amphetamine test system We claim substantial equivalence to the TDx/TDxFLx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II Immunoassay (K883707) manufactured by Abbott Laboratories Inc. Continued on next page Microgenics Corporation CEDIA® DAU AmphAssure Assay page 23…
Abbott Laboratories1988—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.

How does its category compare?

All DKZ devices

DKZ Enzyme Immunoassay, Amphetamine: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DKZ

1in 2024

2008: 22009: 22010: 42011: 62012: 52013: 82014: 82015: 52016: 52018: 32019: 32020: 12023: 22024: 1
2007high 8 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DKZ

180in 2019

2010: 233 days median2011: 123 days median2012: 55 days median2013: 103 days median2014: 128 days median2015: 107 days median2016: 215 days median2018: 128 days median2019: 180 days median
2007high 233 (2010) · low 55 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DKZ

1in 2017

2007: 12008: 32009: 52011: 42013: 12014: 32017: 1
2007high 5 (2009) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DKZ

2in 2025

2008: 122009: 12010: 12011: 22013: 12014: 92015: 82016: 82021: 32022: 42023: 72024: 12025: 2
2007high 12 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DKZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—10
20082—312
20092—51
2010423301
2011612342
201255500
2013810311
2014812839
2015510708
2016521508
20170—10
2018312800
2019318000
20201—00
20210—03
20220—04
20232—07
20241—01
20250—02
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The CEDIA® DAU AmphAssure Assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for the in vitro qualitative determination of amphetamines in human urine on automated clinical chemistry analyzers. This device is used as an accessory to immunoassay screening tests to reduce the number of false positive results needing confirmation testing. Measurements are used as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of amphetamine use or overdose. The assay provides only a…

Read the full statement (122 words)

The CEDIA® DAU AmphAssure Assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for the in vitro

qualitative determination of amphetamines in human urine on automated clinical chemistry

analyzers. This device is used as an accessory to immunoassay screening tests to reduce the

number of false positive results needing confirmation testing. Measurements are used as an aid

in the diagnosis and treatment of amphetamine use or overdose.

The assay provides only a preliminary analytical result. A more specific alternative chemical

method must be used to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GCMS is the preferred

confirmatory method. Other chemical confirmation methods are available. Clinical

consideration and professional judgement should be applied to any drug of abuse test result

particularly when preliminary positive test results are used.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K994380: Cedia Dau Amphassure Assay.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K994380

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026