510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class I · 2011

Instatrak System with Multiple Dataset Navigation, Model IT3500

K040050510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 24, 200472-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050Recalls 6 (1 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ge Medical Systems Navigation and Visualization IN · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Mar 24, 2004 as substantially equivalent to K020631 (Brainlab AG, 2002) and 1 other predicate after a 72-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1999. 3 of the 287 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 280 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 6 times, including a Class I recall.

Decided
Mar 24, 2004
Review
72 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
6 (1 Class I)
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K983410 (1999). 6 ancestors in all, the oldest K954276 (1996). 280 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly. 3 of the 287 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestor2001: 3 other ancestors2006: 1 descendant cleared2009: 3 descendants cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2014: 8 descendants cleared2012: 3 descendants cleared2015: 16 descendants cleared2013: 4 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2016: 16 descendants cleared2017: 30 descendants cleared2018: 19 descendants cleared2020: 27 descendants cleared2019: 16 descendants cleared2021: 24 descendants cleared2026: 22 descendants cleared2022: 23 descendants cleared2023: 18 descendants cleared2025: 28 descendants cleared, 2 with a Class I recall22024: 19 descendants clearedReference device: K983529 · Instatrak 3000 · Visualization Technology, Inc. · 1998 · Class I recallK983410 · @ Target · Brainlab AG · 1999K020631 · IPLAN · Brainlab AG · 20021995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 11 descendants3 generations forward: 11 descendants4 generations forward: 23 descendants5 generations forward: 33 descendants6 generations forward: 35 descendants7 generations forward: 42 descendants8 generations forward: 36 descendants, 2 with a Class I recall29 generations forward: 34 descendants10 generations forward: 24 descendants11 generations forward: 18 descendants12 generations forward: 8 descendants13 generations forward: 2 descendants K020631 · IPLAN · Brainlab AG · 2002K983410 · @ Target · Brainlab AG · 19990+5+10
  1. Root · 2 generations backK983410 @ TargetBrainlab AG · 1999
  2. 1 generation backK020631 IPLANBrainlab AG · 2002
  3. This deviceK040050 Instatrak System with Multiple Dataset Navigation, Model IT3500Ge Medical Systems Navigation and Visualization IN · 2004
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 278 of its ownK053610 AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 222 of its ownK121498 PercunavPhilips Health Care · 2012
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 211 of its ownK132304 Epiq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2013 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · 4 generations on · 100 of its ownK160807 EPIQ 5 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, EPIQ 7Diagnostic Ultrasound…Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2016 · Recalled
  8. Descendant · 4 generations on · 87 of its ownK133833 Nuvis Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2014 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 280 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2006: 12008: 12009: 32010: 12011: 12012: 32013: 42014: 82015: 162016: 162017: 302018: 192019: 162020: 272021: 242022: 232023: 182024: 192025: 282026: 22
2006high 30 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 280 · See all
  • K053610AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc. · 2006 · cites it directly278descendants
  • K121498PercunavPhilips Health Care · 2012 · 2 generations on222descendants
  • K132304Epiq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2013 · 3 generations on211descendants
  • K160807EPIQ 5 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, EPIQ 7Diagnostic Ultrasound System, Affiniti 50…Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2016 · 4 generations on100descendants
  • K133833Nuvis Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2014 · 4 generations on87descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K983410@ TargetBrainlab AG1999—
−1K020631IPLANBrainlab AG2002—
0 (this device)K040050Instatrak System with Multiple Dataset Navigation, Model IT3500Ge Medical Systems Navigation and Visualization IN2004—
+1K053610AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc.20063
+2K121498PercunavPhilips Health Care2012—
+3K132304Epiq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.201336
+4K160807EPIQ 5 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, EPIQ 7Diagnostic Ultrasound System…Philips Ultrasound, Inc.201633
+4K133833Nuvis Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.20143

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
200130

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
200810
200930
201010
201110
201230
201340
201480
2015160
2016160
2017300
2018190
2019160
2020270
2021240
2022230
2023180
2024190
2025282
2026220
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K040050, 1999–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

3 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K020631IPLAN
Summary page 3
…ation Multiple Dataset Navigation option on the InstaTrak system is substantially equivalent to the Image Composer application on the Vectorvision iPlan (K020631), manufactured by BrainLAB, and the StealthStation (K954276) with StealthMerge application, manufactured by Medtr…
Brainlab AG2002—
*K954276Stealthstation
Summary page 3
…stem is substantially equivalent to the Image Composer application on the Vectorvision iPlan (K020631), manufactured by BrainLAB, and the StealthStation (K954276) with StealthMerge application, manufactured by Medtronic. Each predicate device also offers the capability to fu…
Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.19961
†K983529Instatrak 3000Visualization Technology, Inc.1998Class I

Also cleared against K020631: 4 other devices →

What descends from it? (280)

See all 280

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K053610AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc.2006278
K092619Etrax Needle System, Etrax Variable Angle Needle Guidance System, Virtutrax Universal…Civco200961
K091000KneekgEmovi20090

Has anything in its family been recalled? (3 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Feb 24, 2011Not classifiedZ-1941-2011Component design/selectionSensor cables may suffer material degradation when exposed to certain sterilization procedures.
Feb 24, 2011Not classifiedZ-1942-2011Component design/selectionSensor cables may suffer material degradation when exposed to certain sterilization procedures.
Sep 15, 2006Class IZ-1985-2012Software designPlease be aware that this is not a new recall. The firm has taken action; but, due to administrative issues this recall is now being classified by the Agency. On October 11, 2006, GE Healthcare recalled GE OEC InstaTrak 3500 Plus System…
Dec 13, 2004Not classifiedZ-0691-05OtherEnhanced sterility testing revealed the sterilization efficacy of accessories ('Sensors') used with certain Navigation and Visualization systems may be compromised.
Sep 15, 2004Not classifiedZ-0155-05OtherThreads on this accessory spine clamp may become tight, which may make it difficult to install or remove.
Jul 12, 2004Not classifiedZ-0815-05OtherNavigation inaccuracy may result if the headset registration method is used with the Axcess System Kit.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K242670Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound · 2025 · 8 generations on · ◆ in the 2025 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K242519Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound · 2025 · 8 generations on · ◆ in the 2025 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 5 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.0 years on median.
  • 1 of the 6 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K053610 (Traxtal Technologies, Inc., 2006) has gone furthest, with 278 descendants of its own.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K020631.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

The system is intended as an aid to the surgeon for precisely locating anatomical structures anywhere on the human body during either open or percutaneous procedures. It is indicated for any medical condition that may benefit from the use of stereotactic surgery and which provides a reference to anatomical structures such as sinus, skull, long bone, or vertebra, visible on medical images such as CT, MR, or X-ray.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K040050: Instatrak System with Multiple Dataset Navigation, Model IT3500.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K040050

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026