510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2009

Autofuser Ambulatory Infusion Pump

K041585510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 26, 200473-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5725Recalls 46

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Algos, LC · MEB Pump, Infusion, Elastomeric

Cleared on Aug 26, 2004 after a 73-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 46 times.

Decided
Aug 26, 2004
Review
73 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MEB
Recalls
46
Predicates
0

2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2006: 1 descendant cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK041585 Autofuser Ambulatory Infusion PumpAlgos, LC · 2004
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK060258 AutofuserAce Medical Us, LLC · 2006 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK090300 Modification to AutofuserAce Medical Us, LLC · 2009 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K060258AutofuserAce Medical Us, LLC · 2006 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K090300Modification to AutofuserAce Medical Us, LLC · 2009 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K041585Autofuser Ambulatory Infusion PumpAlgos, LC2004—
+1K060258AutofuserAce Medical Us, LLC200646
+2K090300Modification to AutofuserAce Medical Us, LLC200916

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
200910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K041585, 2004–2009Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MEB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MEB device

  1. #1 K250234 SMARTeZ™ Elastomeric Infusion Pump (RS series)score 14.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (6)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—I-Flow Homepump (Eclipse) C-Series
Named without a submission number
—
*—Baxter Infuser
Named without a submission number
—
*—Baxter Intermate
Named without a submission number
—
*—McKinley Accufuser
Named without a submission number
—
*—B Braun spring pump
Named without a submission number
—
*—Sgarlato Pain Control Infusion Pump (PCIP)
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K060258AutofuserAce Medical Us, LLC20061

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1846-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1848-2009Process controlTFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: he seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1834-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1840-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1845-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1829-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1862-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1852-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1832-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1868-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1836-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1838-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1859-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1855-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1865-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1847-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1839-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1858-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1863-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1867-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1844-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1856-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1827-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1830-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1837-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1831-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1842-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1826-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1841-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1824-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1861-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1854-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1828-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1851-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1857-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1864-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1835-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1866-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1823-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1849-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1843-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1825-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1860-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1850-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1853-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.
May 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1833-2009Process controlFailure to infuse and potential compromised sterility: The seal on the tyvek tray cover may fail, compromising sterility, and the device may fail to infuse the drug, resulting in a loss of pain mitigation.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K060258 (Ace Medical Us, LLC, 2006) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MEB devices

MEB Pump, Infusion, Elastomeric: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MEB

2in 2024

2007: 52008: 22009: 12013: 12014: 12016: 12019: 12024: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 5 (2007) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MEB

42in 2007

2007: 42 days median
2007high 42 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MEB

17in 2018

2007: 12008: 32009: 482010: 22011: 8, 1 Class I2013: 2, 1 Class I2018: 17
2007high 48 (2009) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MEB

1,408in 2025

2007: 1102008: 4442009: 7982010: 1,8272011: 2,2652012: 1,9762013: 1,9562014: 2,6952015: 2,9802016: 2,1472017: 1,6532018: 1,4732019: 9742020: 2,7322021: 1,8022022: 1,2882023: 1,2482024: 1,4242025: 1,408
2007high 2,980 (2015) · low 110 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MEB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075421110
20082—3444
20091—48798
20100—21,827
20110—8 (1)2,265
20120—01,976
20131—2 (1)1,956
20141—02,695
20150—02,980
20161—02,147
20170—01,653
20180—171,473
20191—0974
20200—02,732
20210—01,802
20220—01,288
20230—01,248
20242—01,424
20250—01,408
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The AutoFuser family of ambulatory infusion pumps with integrated administration set, either separately or as part of a convenience kit, is intended for general infusion use. Routes of infusion include intravenous, percutaneous, subcutaneous, inter-arterial and epidural, and into intra-operative (soft tissue / body cavity) sites.

Within the AutoFuser family are pump models intended for patient-controlled infusion using the integrated bolus button.

General infusion uses include continuous infusion of a local anesthetic near a nerve for regional anesthesia and pain management for pre-operative, perioperative and postoperative surgery.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K041585: Autofuser Ambulatory Infusion Pump.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K041585

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026