510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Smith & Nephew Competitor Deuce Femoral Components

K061569510(k) SpecialCleared Jul 6, 200630-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · NPJ Prosthesis, Knee Patellofemorotibial, Partial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer

Cleared on Jul 6, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K042896 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2005) and 1 other predicate after a 30-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1996. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jul 6, 2006
Review
30 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NPJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K962137 (1996). 8 ancestors in all, the oldest K951987 (1995). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K052265 · Smith & Nephew Competitor Duo Knee Femoral · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2005 · recalledK043440 · Smith & Nephew, Inc. Revision Knee System · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2005 · recalledK041106 · Revision Knee System · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2004 · recalledK962137 · Genesis II Constrained System · Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc. · 1996 · recalled0
  1. Root · 4 generations backK962137 Genesis II Constrained SystemSmith & Nephew Richards, Inc. · 1996 · Recalled
  2. 3 generations backK041106 Revision Knee SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  3. 2 generations backK043440 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Revision Knee SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  4. 1 generation backK052265 Smith & Nephew Competitor Duo Knee FemoralSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  5. This deviceK061569 Smith & Nephew Competitor Deuce Femoral ComponentsSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2006
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK113038 Smith & Nephew Inc. Unicompartmental and Biocompartmental Knee…Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2012

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K113038Smith & Nephew Inc. Unicompartmental and Biocompartmental Knee System InstrumentsSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K962137Genesis II Constrained SystemSmith & Nephew Richards, Inc.19961
−3K041106Revision Knee SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.20041
−2K043440Smith & Nephew, Inc. Revision Knee SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.20057
−1K052265Smith & Nephew Competitor Duo Knee FemoralSmith & Nephew, Inc.200542
0 (this device)K061569Smith & Nephew Competitor Deuce Femoral ComponentsSmith & Nephew, Inc.2006—
+1K113038Smith & Nephew Inc. Unicompartmental and Biocompartmental Knee System…Smith & Nephew, Inc.2012—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
199620
200510

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K061569, 1996–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NPJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K042896Smith & Nephew Hybrid Knee Femoral
Summary page 1
…The overall design of the Competitor Deuce femoral components is based upon the existing Hybrid Knee femoral components and Competitor Duo femoral components subject of K042896 and K052265, respectively. Device Classification 21 CFR 888.3560 Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-co…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2005—
*K052265Smith & Nephew Competitor Duo Knee Femoral
Summary page 1
…esign of the Competitor Deuce femoral components is based upon the existing Hybrid Knee femoral components and Competitor Duo femoral components subject of K042896 and K052265, respectively. Device Classification 21 CFR 888.3560 Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cem…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.200542

Also cleared against K042896: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K113038Smith & Nephew Inc. Unicompartmental and Biocompartmental Knee System InstrumentsSmith & Nephew, Inc.20120

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 10 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10 months on median.
  • 6 of the 8 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K113038 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2012) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K042896.

How does its category compare?

All NPJ devices

NPJ Prosthesis, Knee Patellofemorotibial, Partial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · NPJ

1in 2015

2007: 12009: 32013: 12015: 1
2007high 3 (2009) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NPJ

76in 2009

2009: 76 days median
2007high 76 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NPJ

1in 2016

2011: 12015: 32016: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NPJ

47in 2025

2008: 12009: 32010: 132011: 322012: 722013: 982014: 752015: 552016: 932017: 1502018: 1412019: 912020: 652021: 512022: 322023: 522024: 442025: 47
2007high 150 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NPJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—01
200937603
20100—013
20110—132
20120—072
20131—098
20140—075
20151—355
20160—193
20170—0150
20180—0141
20190—091
20200—065
20210—051
20220—032
20230—052
20240—044
20250—047
20260—1—

What is it indicated for?

The Competitor Deuce femoral components are intended to be used for those patients whereby conditions exist that can not be solely addressed by a device that treats a single compartment (i.e. unicondylar or patellofemoral prosthesis) of the knee. Indications include: * Post-traumatic arthritis; * Degenerative arthritis; and * Failed osteotomies, hemiarthroplasties; and unicompartmental replacement These indications will be used for the Competitor Deuce…

Read the full statement (100 words)

The Competitor Deuce femoral components are intended to be used for those patients whereby conditions exist that can not be solely addressed by a device that treats a single compartment (i.e. unicondylar or patellofemoral prosthesis) of the knee.

Indications include:

* Post-traumatic arthritis;

* Degenerative arthritis; and

* Failed osteotomies, hemiarthroplasties; and unicompartmental replacement

These indications will be used for the Competitor Deuce femoral components, whereby the medial condyle and patellofemoral regions have been affected by one or more of these conditions.

The Competitor Deuce femoral components are single use only and are intended for implantation only with bone cement.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K061569: Smith & Nephew Competitor Deuce Femoral Components.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K061569

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026