510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Smith & Nephew Inc. Unicompartmental and Biocompartmental Knee System Instruments

K113038510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 5, 201285-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3520

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · HSX Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer

Cleared on Jan 5, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K073175 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2007) and 7 other predicates after an 85-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1996.

Decided
Jan 5, 2012
Review
85 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HSX
Recalls
None
Predicates
8

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K962137 (1996). 27 ancestors in all, the oldest K760245 (1976). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2010: 1 other ancestor2007: 1 other ancestor2006: 2 other ancestors2005: 2 other ancestors2003: 1 other ancestor1991: 1 other ancestor2004: 3 other ancestors2001: 2 other ancestors1976: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor1998: 1 other ancestor1996: 3 other ancestors1993: 1 other ancestor1988: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestorK962137 · Genesis II Constrained System · Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc. · 1996 · recalledK041106 · Revision Knee System · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2004 · recalledK043440 · Smith & Nephew, Inc. Revision Knee System · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2005 · recalledK052265 · Smith & Nephew Competitor Duo Knee Femoral · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2005 · recalledK061569 · Smith & Nephew Competitor Deuce Femoral Components · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 20061980199020002010
  1. Root · 5 generations backK962137 Genesis II Constrained SystemSmith & Nephew Richards, Inc. · 1996 · Recalled
  2. 4 generations backK041106 Revision Knee SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  3. 3 generations backK043440 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Revision Knee SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  4. 2 generations backK052265 Smith & Nephew Competitor Duo Knee FemoralSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK061569 Smith & Nephew Competitor Deuce Femoral ComponentsSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2006
  6. This deviceK113038 Smith & Nephew Inc. Unicompartmental and Biocompartmental Knee…Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2012
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K962137Genesis II Constrained SystemSmith & Nephew Richards, Inc.19961
−4K041106Revision Knee SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.20041
−3K043440Smith & Nephew, Inc. Revision Knee SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.20057
−2K052265Smith & Nephew Competitor Duo Knee FemoralSmith & Nephew, Inc.200542
−1K061569Smith & Nephew Competitor Deuce Femoral ComponentsSmith & Nephew, Inc.2006—
0 (this device)K113038Smith & Nephew Inc. Unicompartmental and Biocompartmental Knee System…Smith & Nephew, Inc.2012—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
197610
198810
199110
199310
199510
199630
199810
199910
200120
200310
200430
200520
200620
200710
201010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K113038, 1996–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HSX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HSX device

  1. #1 K261609 Freedom Partial Knee Systemscore 15.1 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (8)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K073175Journey Unicondylar Femoral Implant
Summary page 1
…emoral polymer/metal semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Device Class: Class 11 Panel Code: Orthopaedics/87 Predicate Devices: Journey Unicondylar Femoral Implant (K073175) Unicondylar Femoral Component (K030301) Competitor Deuce (Journey) Femoral Component - Sizes 1-8, Oxinium and CoCr (K…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2007—
*K030301Unicondylar Femoral Component
Summary page 1
…prosthesis Device Class: Class 11 Panel Code: Orthopaedics/87 Predicate Devices: Journey Unicondylar Femoral Implant (K073175) Unicondylar Femoral Component (K030301) Competitor Deuce (Journey) Femoral Component - Sizes 1-8, Oxinium and CoCr (K061569) Competitor (Journey) PFJ Patello-…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2003—
*K061569Smith & Nephew Competitor Deuce Femoral Components
Summary page 1
…rney Unicondylar Femoral Implant (K073175) Unicondylar Femoral Component (K030301) Competitor Deuce (Journey) Femoral Component - Sizes 1-8, Oxinium and CoCr (K061569) Competitor (Journey) PFJ Patello-Femoral Knee Implant (Oxinium) (K051086) Genesis Unicompartmental Knee System (K91 27…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2006—
*K051086Smith & Nephew Patello-Femoral Implant
Summary page 1
…(K030301) Competitor Deuce (Journey) Femoral Component - Sizes 1-8, Oxinium and CoCr (K061569) Competitor (Journey) PFJ Patello-Femoral Knee Implant (Oxinium) (K051086) Genesis Unicompartmental Knee System (K91 2735) Journey Unicondylar Tibial. Baseplastes (K102069) Competitor Unic…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2005—
*K912735Genesis Unicompartmental Knee System
Summary page 1
…mponent - Sizes 1-8, Oxinium and CoCr (K061569) Competitor (Journey) PFJ Patello-Femoral Knee Implant (Oxinium) (K051086) Genesis Unicompartmental Knee System (K91 2735) Journey Unicondylar Tibial. Baseplastes (K102069) Competitor Unicondylar Knee Tibia[ Baseplate (K061011) Competit…
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.19912
*K102069Journey Unicondylar Tibial Baseplates
Summary page 1
…petitor (Journey) PFJ Patello-Femoral Knee Implant (Oxinium) (K051086) Genesis Unicompartmental Knee System (K91 2735) Journey Unicondylar Tibial. Baseplastes (K102069) Competitor Unicondylar Knee Tibia[ Baseplate (K061011) Competitor Unicondylar AlI-Poly Tibia[ Baseplate (K061779) De…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2010—
*K061011Competitor Unicondylar Knee Tibial Baseplate
Summary page 1
…(K051086) Genesis Unicompartmental Knee System (K91 2735) Journey Unicondylar Tibial. Baseplastes (K102069) Competitor Unicondylar Knee Tibia[ Baseplate (K061011) Competitor Unicondylar AlI-Poly Tibia[ Baseplate (K061779) Device Description Subject of this Traditional 510(k) Premark…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2006—
*K061779Competitor Unicondylar All-Poly Tibial Baseplate
Summary page 1
…Journey Unicondylar Tibial. Baseplastes (K102069) Competitor Unicondylar Knee Tibia[ Baseplate (K061011) Competitor Unicondylar AlI-Poly Tibia[ Baseplate (K061779) Device Description Subject of this Traditional 510(k) Premarket Notification are manual instruments associated with the Smith…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2006—

Also cleared against K073175: 6 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10 months on median.
  • 11 of the 27 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 6 other devices also cite its predicate K073175.

How does its category compare?

All HSX devices

HSX Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HSX

4in 2025

2007: 62008: 42009: 22010: 32011: 12012: 52013: 22015: 12016: 32017: 52018: 22019: 72020: 42021: 72022: 22023: 12024: 42025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2019) · low 0 (2014)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HSX

59in 2025

2007: 33 days median2008: 102 days median2010: 74 days median2012: 88 days median2016: 147 days median2017: 160 days median2019: 90 days median2020: 40 days median2021: 81 days median2024: 133 days median2025: 59 days median
2007high 160 (2017) · low 33 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HSX

2in 2020

2009: 492013: 12016: 12017: 42020: 2
2007high 49 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HSX

175in 2025

2007: 62008: 42009: 212010: 582011: 1142012: 832013: 792014: 662015: 572016: 1072017: 1132018: 1592019: 1772020: 2732021: 2402022: 2572023: 2312024: 1722025: 175
2007high 273 (2020) · low 4 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HSX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200763306
2008410204
20092—4921
2010374058
20111—0114
2012588083
20132—179
20140—066
20151—057
201631471107
201751604113
20182—0159
20197900177
20204402273
20217810240
20222—0257
20231—0231
202441330172
20254590175
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

Smith and Nephew Unicondylar Knee Systems are indicated for restoring either compartment of a knee that has been affected by the following: 1. Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarhritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis; 2. Correction of functional deformity; 3. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed: and 4. Treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques Smith and Nephew…

Read the full statement (208 words)

Smith and Nephew Unicondylar Knee Systems are indicated for restoring either compartment of a knee that has been affected by the following:

1. Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarhritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis;

2. Correction of functional deformity;

3. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed: and

4. Treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques

Smith and Nephew Bicompartmental Knee Systems are intended to be used for those patients whereby conditions exist that cannot be solely addressed by adevice that treats a single compartment (i.e. unicondylar or patellofemoral prosthesis) of the knee.

Indications include:

" Post-traumatic arthritis;

" Degenerative arthiritis; and

* Failed osteotomies, hemniarthroplasties; and unicompartmental replacement

These indications will be used for Smith and Nephew Bicompartmental Knee Systems, whereby the medial condyle and patellofemoral regions have been affected by one or more of these conditions.

The Smith and Nephew Patello-Femoral Joint Knee Systems are indicated for replacement of the femoral side of the patello-femoral joint. They are intended to be used in patellofemoral arthoplasty in patients with:I

1. Degenerative arthritis in the distal femur and patella.

2. A history of patellar dislocation or patellar fracture.

3. Failed previous surgery (arthroplasty, tibia[ tubercle elevation, lateral release) where pain, deformity or dysfunction persists.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K113038: Smith & Nephew Inc. Unicompartmental and Biocompartmental Knee System Instruments.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K113038

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026