510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class I · 2023

Apollo Gamma Camera System

K062298510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 23, 200615-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1200Recalls 27 (1 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Adac Laboratories · KPS System, Tomography, Computed, Emission

Cleared on Aug 23, 2006 as substantially equivalent to K033254 (Adac Laboratories, 2003) after a 15-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1998. 4 of the 5 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 27 times, including a Class I recall.

Decided
Aug 23, 2006
Review
15 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KPS
Recalls
27 (1 Class I)
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K982911 (1998). 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly. 4 of the 5 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2008: 1 descendant cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12009: 1 descendant clearedK982911 · FORTE · Adac Laboratories · 1998 · Class I recallK033254 · Forte Gamma Camera System · Adac Laboratories · 2003 · Class I recall1995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant, 1 with a Class I recall12 generations forward: 1 descendant K033254 · Forte Gamma Camera System · Adac Laboratories · 2003 · Class I recallK982911 · FORTE · Adac Laboratories · 1998 · Class I recall0
  1. Root · 2 generations backK982911 FORTEAdac Laboratories · 1998 · Recalled (Class I)
  2. 1 generation backK033254 Forte Gamma Camera SystemAdac Laboratories · 2003 · Recalled (Class I)
  3. This deviceK062298 Apollo Gamma Camera SystemAdac Laboratories · 2006
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK080927 Brightview VCT Imaging SystemPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2008 · Recalled (Class I)
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK083649 Cardius 3 X-ActDigirad Corp. · 2009

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K080927Brightview VCT Imaging SystemPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2008 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K083649Cardius 3 X-ActDigirad Corp. · 2009 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K982911FORTEAdac Laboratories1998Class I
−1K033254Forte Gamma Camera SystemAdac Laboratories2003Class I
0 (this device)K062298Apollo Gamma Camera SystemAdac Laboratories2006—
+1K080927Brightview VCT Imaging SystemPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.2008Class I
+2K083649Cardius 3 X-ActDigirad Corp.2009—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200811
200910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K062298, 1998–2009Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

4 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KPS device

  1. #1 K253564 uMI Panvivo (uMI Panvivo); uMI Panvivo (uMI…score 18.6 · 17 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K033254Forte Gamma Camera System
Summary page 1
…ct Code: 90 KPS C. Date prepared: July 21, 2006 D. Predicate Device: ForteTm Gamma Camera System (K033254) E. Intended Use: The Apollo Gamma Camera System is intended to produce images depicting the anatomical distributions of…
Adac Laboratories2003Class I

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K080927Brightview VCT Imaging System Class IPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.20081

Has anything in its family been recalled? (4 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 15, 2023Class IZ-0929-2024Component design/selectionDetector may unexpectedly fall due to a component failure. If the detector is positioned below center of gantry, there is a potential for abrasion, contusion, laceration, and/or fracture to the patient's lower limbs, as well as an…
Nov 30, 2023Class IIZ-0677-2024Device DesignWhile using Pre-Programmed Motion during an extrinsic quality assurance scan, a gap is created between the patient support and the detector, which may present a potential extremity entrapment hazard. Risk to patients may include fracture…
Dec 15, 2017Class IIZ-0510-2018Under Investigation by firmDuring collimator exchange, the alignment of the collimator cart and detectors may cause a collimator exchange fail, and a collimator may drop to the floor beside the collimator cart. The collimator may be partially supported by the cart…
Dec 15, 2017Class IIZ-0512-2018Under Investigation by firmDuring collimator exchange, the alignment of the collimator cart and detectors may cause a collimator exchange fail, and a collimator may drop to the floor beside the collimator cart. The collimator may be partially supported by the cart…
Dec 15, 2017Class IIZ-0511-2018Under Investigation by firmDuring collimator exchange, the alignment of the collimator cart and detectors may cause a collimator exchange fail, and a collimator may drop to the floor beside the collimator cart. The collimator may be partially supported by the cart…
Feb 24, 2017Class IIZ-1752-2017Nonconforming Material/ComponentThe brake hub was not engaging with the gear box shaft due to an error in the assembly of components within the brake hub mechanism after service, causing the detector to backdrive.
Feb 24, 2017Class IIIZ-1753-2017Nonconforming Material/ComponentThe brake hub was not engaging with the gear box shaft due to an error in the assembly of components within the brake hub mechanism after service, causing the detector to backdrive.
Feb 24, 2017Class IIZ-1750-2017Nonconforming Material/ComponentThe brake hub was not engaging with the gear box shaft due to an error in the assembly of components within the brake hub mechanism after service, causing the detector to backdrive.
Feb 24, 2017Class IIZ-1751-2017Nonconforming Material/ComponentThe brake hub was not engaging with the gear box shaft due to an error in the assembly of components within the brake hub mechanism after service, causing the detector to backdrive.
Jan 31, 2017Class IIZ-1481-2017Software designFour issues: 1. Motion controller problem stops scan and no data image produced. 2. Door interlock switch problem disables CT scan. 3. Detector contacts head holder when performing Patient Unload. 4. JETStream freezes during gated planar…
Jan 31, 2017Class IIZ-1479-2017Software designFour issues: 1. Motion controller problem stops scan and no data image produced. 2. Door interlock switch problem disables CT scan. 3. Detector contacts head holder when performing Patient Unload. 4. JETStream freezes during gated planar…
Jan 31, 2017Class IIZ-1480-2017Software designFour issues: 1. Motion controller problem stops scan and no data image produced. 2. Door interlock switch problem disables CT scan. 3. Detector contacts head holder when performing Patient Unload. 4. JETStream freezes during gated planar…
May 25, 2016Class IIZ-2735-2016Software designThe firm became aware of an issue where during a non-Auto Body Contouring (ABC), non-circular, rel-180 scan, the detector may come in contact with the patient. The issue was caused by a software defect in the workflow setup script.
Dec 17, 2015Class IIZ-1020-2016Software designThe firm discovered four issues with the BrightView Family systems. Issue 1: During a cardiac non-Auto Body Contouring (ABC) scan, using Cardiac High Resolution (CHR) collimators, the collimator may come in contact with the bottom edge of…
Dec 17, 2015Class IIZ-1021-2016Software designThe firm discovered four issues with the BrightView Family systems. Issue 1: During a cardiac non-Auto Body Contouring (ABC) scan, using Cardiac High Resolution (CHR) collimators, the collimator may come in contact with the bottom edge of…
Mar 6, 2015Class IIZ-1790-2015Nonconforming Material/ComponentThe firm was notified that the failure of the UPS accessory devices used in conjunction with Computed Tomography X-ray systems and Diagnostic Imaging systems. may result in battery acid leakage, overheating and/or emission of fumes.
Mar 6, 2015Class IIZ-1791-2015Nonconforming Material/ComponentThe firm was notified that the failure of the UPS accessory devices used in conjunction with Computed Tomography X-ray systems and Diagnostic Imaging systems. may result in battery acid leakage, overheating and/or emission of fumes.
Nov 4, 2014Class IIZ-0450-2015Software designSoftware issues
Apr 25, 2013Class IIZ-1481-2013OtherPhilips has received one report from the field that there was an unexpected motion of the detector due to a failure of the mechanical assembly.
Jun 15, 2011Not classifiedZ-2947-2011Software designNon-conformances with BrightView X/XCT systems running version 2.0.1 including data transfer, XCT acquisition, Pixel Mask for image reconstruction and table moving incorrectly.
Jun 3, 2011Not classifiedZ-2867-2011Device DesignThe gap between the two parts of the table may permit pinches to occur on either patients skin or other body parts; it has the potential for serious injury if a patients finger is caught between the pallet and patient table resulting in…
Jun 3, 2011Not classifiedZ-2870-2011Device DesignThe gap between the two parts of the table may permit pinches to occur on either patient's skin or other body parts; it has the potential for serious injury if a patient's finger is caught between the pallet and patient table resulting in…
Jun 3, 2011Not classifiedZ-2868-2011Device DesignThe gap between the two parts of the table may permit pinches to occur on either patient's skin or other body parts; it has the potential for serious injury if a patient's finger is caught between the pallet and patient table resulting in…
Jun 3, 2011Not classifiedZ-2869-2011Device DesignThe gap between the two parts of the table may permit pinches to occur on either patient's skin or other body parts; it has the potential for serious injury if a patient's finger is caught between the pallet and patient table resulting in…
Jun 3, 2011Not classifiedZ-2872-2011Device DesignThe gap between the two parts of the table may permit pinches to occur on either patient's skin or other body parts; it has the potential for serious injury if a patient's finger is caught between the pallet and patient table resulting in…
Jun 3, 2011Not classifiedZ-2871-2011Device DesignThe gap between the two parts of the table may permit pinches to occur on either patient's skin or other body parts; it has the potential for serious injury if a patient's finger is caught between the pallet and patient table resulting in…
Jul 2, 2009Not classifiedZ-1892-2009Process controlUnexpected movement-- if the drive assembly is severely compromised, the detector may slide to its hardware limit.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K033254Forte Gamma Camera SystemAdac Laboratories · 2003 · Direct predicate · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 13 Class I recalls
  • K982911FORTEAdac Laboratories · 1998 · 2 generations back · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 12 Class I recalls
  • K080927Brightview VCT Imaging SystemPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2008 · Cites it directly · ◆ in the 2008 descendants bar of FIG. 12 Class I recalls

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 4.9 years on median.
  • 2 of the 2 ancestors have a recall of any class; 2 have a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K080927 (Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc., 2008) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KPS devices

KPS System, Tomography, Computed, Emission: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KPS

12in 2025

2007: 82008: 172009: 92010: 32011: 72012: 62013: 112014: 112015: 32016: 112017: 112018: 132019: 32020: 122021: 152022: 52023: 122024: 112025: 122026 (partial year): 6
2007high 17 (2008) · low 3 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KPS

65in 2025

2007: 38 days median2008: 25 days median2009: 42 days median2010: 91 days median2011: 28 days median2012: 94 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 92 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 65 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 59 days median2019: 60 days median2020: 72 days median2021: 66 days median2022: 60 days median2023: 63 days median2024: 59 days median2025: 65 days median2026 (partial year): 67 days median
2007high 112 (2015) · low 25 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KPS

16in 2025

2007: 222008: 162009: 142010: 42011: 342012: 132013: 132014: 182015: 52016: 162017: 112018: 12, 3 Class I2019: 5, 5 Class I2020: 82021: 42022: 8, 6 Class I2023: 6, 3 Class I2024: 152025: 162026 (partial year): 6
2007high 34 (2011) · low 4 (2010)2026

Class I (17 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KPS

36in 2025

2007: 382008: 112009: 152010: 442011: 562012: 342013: 2402014: 332015: 242016: 102017: 312018: 262019: 1052020: 222021: 102022: 152023: 222024: 232025: 36
2007high 240 (2013) · low 10 (2016)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KPS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20078382238
200817251611
20099421415
2010391444
20117283456
20126941334
2013118413240
201411921833
20153112524
201611651610
2017111041131
2018135912 (3)26
20193605 (5)105
20201272822
20211566410
20225608 (6)15
202312636 (3)22
202411591523
202512651636
20266676—

What is it indicated for?

The Apollo Gamma Camera System is intended to produce images depicting the

anatomical distributions of single photon emitting radioisotopes within the human body

for interpretation by medical personnel.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K062298: Apollo Gamma Camera System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K062298

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026