510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2017

L-Varlock

K080537510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 30, 2008124-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Kiscomedica S.A. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jun 30, 2008 after a 124-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 1 of the 959 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 958 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jun 30, 2008
Review
124 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

958 later devices descend from it, 13 citing it directly. 1 of the 959 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2016: 51 descendants cleared2011: 5 descendants cleared2014: 24 descendants cleared2021: 77 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12010: 1 descendant cleared2013: 17 descendants cleared2012: 7 descendants cleared2017: 75 descendants cleared2024: 97 descendants cleared2015: 29 descendants cleared2019: 80 descendants cleared2023: 96 descendants cleared2020: 92 descendants cleared2022: 80 descendants cleared2018: 72 descendants cleared2025: 81 descendants cleared2026: 74 descendants cleared20052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK080537 L-VarlockKiscomedica S.A. · 2008
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 869 of its ownK102293 Caliber SpacerGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2011
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 762 of its ownK111512 Bonebac T-Plif Intervertebral Body Fusion Device SystemThompson Mis, Inc. · 2011
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 761 of its ownK120368 Capstone Control Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2012
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 723 of its ownK121760 Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2012
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 718 of its ownK113465 Acculif TL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2011

Showing 5 of 958 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2010: 12011: 52012: 72013: 172014: 242015: 292016: 512017: 752018: 722019: 802020: 922021: 772022: 802023: 962024: 972025: 812026: 74
2010high 97 (2024) · low 1 (2010)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 958 · See all
  • K102293Caliber SpacerGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly869descendants
  • K111512Bonebac T-Plif Intervertebral Body Fusion Device SystemThompson Mis, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly762descendants
  • K120368Capstone Control Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2012 · 2 generations on761descendants
  • K121760Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2012 · 3 generations on723descendants
  • K113465Acculif TL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2011 · 2 generations on718descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K080537L-VarlockKiscomedica S.A.2008—
+1K102293Caliber SpacerGlobus Medical, Inc.2011—
+1K111512Bonebac T-Plif Intervertebral Body Fusion Device SystemThompson Mis, Inc.2011—
+2K120368Capstone Control Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2012—
+3K121760Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2012—
+2K113465Acculif TL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201150
201270
2013170
2014240
2015290
2016510
2017750
2018720
2019800
2020920
2021771
2022800
2023960
2024970
2025810
2026740
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K080537, 2008–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (958)

See all 958

13 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K102293Caliber SpacerGlobus Medical, Inc.2011869
K111512Bonebac T-Plif Intervertebral Body Fusion Device SystemThompson Mis, Inc.2011762
K123231Caliber SpacersGlobus Medical, Inc.2013657
K133813Flxfit Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceExpanding Orthopedics, Inc.2014137
K113527Opticage Interbody Fusion DeviceInterventional Spine, Inc.2012103
K153400ProLift Expandable SystemLife Spine, Inc.201672
K171519FLXfit™Expanding Orthopedics, Inc.201771
K100820Wenzel Spine Varilift Interbody Fusion SystemWenzel Spine201016
K110442Nanovis Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemNanovis, LLC201110
K153786Prow Fusion-VNlt Spine, Ltd.20166

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 11, 2017Class IIZ-1461-2017Process controlFirm received a complaint of the tip holder breaking during use.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 3 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K102293 (Globus Medical, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 869 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The L-Varlock Lumbar Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). L-Varlock Lumbar implants are to be used…

Read the full statement (110 words)

The L-Varlock Lumbar Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s).

L-Varlock Lumbar implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and implanted via an open posterior approach. L-Varlock Lumbar implant is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K080537: L-Varlock.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080537

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026