510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

HDR Vision, Vision HDR, HD R/F, Uromat HD R/F

K081073510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 5, 2008234-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1650

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Pausch, LLC · OWB Interventional Fluoroscopic X-Ray System

Cleared on Dec 5, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K062623 (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., 2007) after a 234-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1980. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Dec 5, 2008
Review
234 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OWB
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K801623 (1980). 56 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2002: 4 other ancestors1999: 3 other ancestors2001: 1 other ancestor2000: 3 other ancestors1997: 4 other ancestors2004: 2 other ancestors1996: 4 other ancestors1995: 12 other ancestors1993: 3 other ancestors1989: 1 other ancestor1986: 1 other ancestor1992: 2 other ancestors1991: 4 other ancestors1988: 2 other ancestors1981: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor2010: 1 descendant clearedK801623 · Cavitron Ultrasonic Surg. Aspir. Cusa · Cavitron Corp. · 1980K962952 · Olympus Ultrasonic Surgical System (Usu) · Olympus Optical, Co. · 1996×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K972114 (1998), K981993 (1998) K994231 · Siemens Integrated Operating System (Sios) · Siemens Medical Corp. · 2000×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K052202 (2006), K061054 (2006) K062623 · Axiom Luminos DRF · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2007 · recalled19801990200020102020
  1. Root · 8 generations backK801623 Cavitron Ultrasonic Surg. Aspir. CusaCavitron Corp. · 1980
  2. 7 generations backK962952 Olympus Ultrasonic Surgical System (Usu)Olympus Optical, Co. · 1996
  3. 6 generations backK972114 Olympus Sonosurg SystemThe Olympus Optical Co. · 1998
  4. 5 generations backK981993 Olympus Integrated Endosurgery System EndoalphaThe Olympus Optical Co. · 1998
  5. 4 generations backK994231 Siemens Integrated Operating System (Sios)Siemens Medical Corp. · 2000
  6. 3 generations backK052202 Axiom Artis - Modular Angiographic SystemSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  7. 2 generations backK061054 Axiom Aristos FX PlusSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  8. 1 generation backK062623 Axiom Luminos DRFSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  9. This deviceK081073 HDR Vision, Vision HDR, HD R/F, Uromat HD R/FPausch, LLC · 2008
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK101042 BladeviewAccogent, LLC · 2010

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K101042BladeviewAccogent, LLC · 2010 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K801623Cavitron Ultrasonic Surg. Aspir. CusaCavitron Corp.1980—
−7K962952Olympus Ultrasonic Surgical System (Usu)Olympus Optical, Co.1996—
−6K972114Olympus Sonosurg SystemThe Olympus Optical Co.1998—
−5K981993Olympus Integrated Endosurgery System EndoalphaThe Olympus Optical Co.1998—
−4K994231Siemens Integrated Operating System (Sios)Siemens Medical Corp.2000—
−3K052202Axiom Artis - Modular Angiographic SystemSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.200629
−2K061054Axiom Aristos FX PlusSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.20063
−1K062623Axiom Luminos DRFSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.200720
0 (this device)K081073HDR Vision, Vision HDR, HD R/F, Uromat HD R/FPausch, LLC2008—
+1K101042BladeviewAccogent, LLC2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198110
198610
198820
198910
199140
199220
199330
199410
1995120
199640
199740
199930
200030
200110
200240
200420

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K081073, 1980–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OWB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OWB device

  1. #1 K251602 Alphenix, INFX-8000V/B, INFX-8000V/S, V9.6…score 18.3 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K062623Axiom Luminos DRF
Summary page 1
…apter J, Federal Dlaguost:c X-ray Equipment Standard Predicate Device Claiming Siemens Medical Systems AXIOM Lummos dRF " Snbstmfianquivflenuto' © . 510(k) Control Number: K062623 Reason For Submission New device Description of this Device: The HDR Vision is intended to be used as a universal dlagnostlc imag…
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.200720

Also cleared against K062623: 9 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K101042BladeviewAccogent, LLC20100

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 28 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.5 years on median.
  • 18 of the 56 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K101042 (Accogent, LLC, 2010) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 9 other devices also cite its predicate K062623.

How does its category compare?

All OWB devices

OWB Interventional Fluoroscopic X-Ray System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OWB

22in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 92010: 72011: 62012: 62013: 112014: 152015: 112016: 162017: 202018: 232019: 92020: 162021: 242022: 212023: 122024: 132025: 222026 (partial year): 15
2007high 24 (2021) · low 3 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OWB

148in 2025

2007: 52 days median2008: 135 days median2009: 99 days median2010: 66 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 37 days median2013: 119 days median2014: 158 days median2015: 66 days median2016: 103 days median2017: 76 days median2018: 54 days median2019: 174 days median2020: 53 days median2021: 60 days median2022: 90 days median2023: 152 days median2024: 126 days median2025: 148 days median2026 (partial year): 221 days median
2007high 221 (2026) · low 37 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OWB

42so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2008: 12013: 102014: 92015: 352016: 132017: 132018: 62019: 72020: 82021: 312022: 242023: 222024: 112025: 302026 (partial year): 42
2007high 42 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OWB

14,008in 2025

2007: 12011: 12012: 12013: 272014: 1032015: 2,1342016: 4,0742017: 1,6042018: 1,4492019: 1,5582020: 1,5812021: 1,9812022: 2,9322023: 7,6042024: 7,9422025: 14,008
2007high 14,008 (2025) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OWB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200735201
2008413510
200999900
201076600
201167901
201263701
2013111191027
2014151589103
20151166352,134
201616103134,074
20172076131,604
2018235461,449
2019917471,558
2020165381,581
20212460311,981
20222190242,932
202312152227,604
202413126117,942
2025221483014,008
20261522142—

What is it indicated for?

The HDR Vision is intended to be used as a uiversal diagnostic imaging system for rediographic and fluoroscopic studies. Using a digital flat detector, it can perform a range of applications including general RIF, angiography and pediatric examinations. The system has medical applications ranging from but not limited to gastrointestinal examinations, cranial, skeletal, thoracic and lung exposures as well as examination of the urogenital tract. They may…

Read the full statement (125 words)

The HDR Vision is intended to be used as a uiversal diagnostic imaging system for rediographic and fluoroscopic studies. Using a digital flat detector, it can perform a range of applications including general RIF, angiography and pediatric examinations.

The system has medical applications ranging from but not limited to gastrointestinal examinations, cranial, skeletal, thoracic and lung exposures as well as examination of the urogenital tract. They may also be used in lymphography, endoscopy, myelography, venography, pediatrics, arthrography, interventional radiology, digital angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

HDR Vision may be used for outpatient and emergency treatment, as well as for mobile transport (wheelchair and bed)

The HDR Vision is a device intended to visualize anatomical structures by converting a pattern of X-ray into a visible image.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K081073: HDR Vision, Vision HDR, HD R/F, Uromat HD R/F.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K081073

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026