510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2012

Mak Oss Knee Femoral Components

K083779510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 3, 2009105-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3510Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biomet Manufacturing Corp · KRO Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer

Cleared on Apr 3, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K002757 (Biomet, Inc., 2000) and 2 other predicates after a 105-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2000. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Apr 3, 2009
Review
105 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KRO
Recalls
1
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K002757 (2000). 4 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2005: 1 other ancestor2013: 1 descendant clearedK002757 · Oncology Salvage System · Biomet, Inc. · 2000 · recalledK021260 · Reduced Size Oncology Salvage System · Biomet, Inc. · 2002K051479 · RS (Reduced Size) Oss (Orthopedic Salvage System) Additional Components · Biomet Manufacturing, Inc. · 2005200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K051479 · RS (Reduced Size) Oss (Orthopedic Salvage System) Additional Components · Biomet Manufacturing, Inc. · 2005K021260 · Reduced Size Oncology Salvage System · Biomet, Inc. · 2002K002757 · Oncology Salvage System · Biomet, Inc. · 2000 · recalled0
  1. Root · 3 generations backK002757 Oncology Salvage SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2000 · Recalled
  2. 2 generations backK021260 Reduced Size Oncology Salvage SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2002
  3. 1 generation backK051479 RS (Reduced Size) Oss (Orthopedic Salvage System) Additional…Biomet Manufacturing, Inc. · 2005
  4. This deviceK083779 Mak Oss Knee Femoral ComponentsBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2009
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK131393 Mak Oss Femoral Knee ComponentsBiomet Orthopedics Corp. · 2013

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K131393Mak Oss Femoral Knee ComponentsBiomet Orthopedics Corp. · 2013 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K002757Oncology Salvage SystemBiomet, Inc.200014
−2K021260Reduced Size Oncology Salvage SystemBiomet, Inc.2002—
−1K051479RS (Reduced Size) Oss (Orthopedic Salvage System) Additional ComponentsBiomet Manufacturing, Inc.2005—
0 (this device)K083779Mak Oss Knee Femoral ComponentsBiomet Manufacturing Corp2009—
+1K131393Mak Oss Femoral Knee ComponentsBiomet Orthopedics Corp.2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K083779, 2000–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KRO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KRO device

  1. #1 K251665 Triathlon® Hinge Knee Systemscore 19.0 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K002757Oncology Salvage System
Summary page 1
…lymer constrained cemented prosthesis (21 CFR 888.3510) Legally Marketed Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: K002757 Oncology Salvage System K051479 RS (Reduced Size) 055 (Orthopedic Salvage System) Component K052685 Orthoped…
Biomet, Inc.200014
*K051479RS (Reduced Size) Oss (Orthopedic Salvage System) Additional Components
Summary page 1
…prosthesis (21 CFR 888.3510) Legally Marketed Devices To Which Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: K002757 Oncology Salvage System K051479 RS (Reduced Size) 055 (Orthopedic Salvage System) Component K052685 Orthopedic Salvage System - COSS Device Descript…
Biomet Manufacturing, Inc.2005—
*K052685Orthopedic Salvage System- Oss
Summary page 1
…To Which Substantial Equivalence Is Claimed: K002757 Oncology Salvage System K051479 RS (Reduced Size) 055 (Orthopedic Salvage System) Component K052685 Orthopedic Salvage System - COSS Device Description: There are two styles of MAK OSS Knee Femoral components, resurfacing and…
Biomet, Inc.20052

Also cleared against K002757: 20 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K131393Mak Oss Femoral Knee ComponentsBiomet Orthopedics Corp.20130

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 20, 2012Not classifiedZ-1438-2012Component design/selectionBiomet initiated this action after receiving complaints of the MAK OSS No Head Lock Pin dislodging from its intended position (post-initial surgery). An investigation was initiated and the available lots of the Lock Pin were evaluated and…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.2 years on median.
  • 2 of the 4 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K131393 (Biomet Orthopedics Corp., 2013) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 20 other devices also cite its predicate K002757.

How does its category compare?

All KRO devices

KRO Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · KRO

3in 2025

2007: 12008: 32009: 32010: 12011: 22012: 22013: 32014: 22015: 62016: 32017: 12019: 32020: 12021: 32022: 12023: 42024: 32025: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 6 (2015) · low 0 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KRO

56in 2025

2008: 126 days median2009: 86 days median2013: 189 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 148 days median2019: 244 days median2021: 57 days median2023: 148 days median2024: 87 days median2025: 56 days median
2007high 244 (2019) · low 56 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KRO

14so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 12008: 32009: 82011: 12012: 12013: 22015: 12016: 52017: 42018: 12021: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 14
2007high 14 (2026) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KRO

915in 2025

2007: 372008: 442009: 662010: 1102011: 1192012: 1732013: 1942014: 4062015: 3332016: 3692017: 5432018: 6142019: 7592020: 7492021: 7702022: 8922023: 7462024: 8552025: 915
2007high 915 (2025) · low 37 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KRO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—137
20083126344
2009386866
20101—0110
20112—1119
20122—1173
201331892194
20142—0406
201561131333
201631485369
20171—4543
20180—1614
201932440759
20201—0749
20213571770
20221—0892
202341480746
20243870855
20253561915
20261—14—

What is it indicated for?

Biomet's OSS Knee System is intended for use in total knee replacement. Specific indications for these devices are: 1. Painful and disabled joint resulting from avascular necrosis; osteoarthritis, rheumatoid. arthritis or traumatic arthritis. 2. .Correction of varus, valgus Or post traumatic.deformity 3. Correction of revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or previous joint replacement. 4. Ligament deficiencies 5. Tumor resections 6. Treatment…

Read the full statement (98 words)

Biomet's OSS Knee System is intended for use in total knee replacement. Specific indications for these devices are:

1. Painful and disabled joint resulting from avascular necrosis; osteoarthritis, rheumatoid. arthritis or traumatic arthritis.

2. .Correction of varus, valgus Or post traumatic.deformity

3. Correction of revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or previous joint replacement.

4. Ligament deficiencies

5. Tumor resections

6. Treatment of non-unions, femoral neck and trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable using other techniques

7. Revision of previously failed total joint arthroplasy.

8.. Trauma

These devices are to be used with bone cement

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K083779: Mak Oss Knee Femoral Components.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K083779

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026