510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2026USTAR II System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
United Orthopedic Corporation · KRO Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer
Cleared on Sep 23, 2019 as substantially equivalent to K082424 (United Orthopedic Corp., 2008) and 8 other predicates after a 244-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1994. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 5 times.
- Decided
- Sep 23, 2019
- Review
- 244 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- KRO
- Recalls
- 5
- Predicates
- 9
Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K921308 (1994). 53 ancestors in all, the oldest K864671 (1987). 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.
- Root · 7 generations backK921308 HG Multilock Hip Prosthesis W/ TI-NidiumZimmer, Inc. · 1994 · Recalled
- 6 generations backK972893 Partnership Revision Femoral StemsHowmedica Corp. · 1997
- 5 generations backK983404 Type 3 Femoral ComponentsHowmedica Corp. · 1998 · Recalled
- 4 generations backK013106 2 Piece Modular Hip StemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2002 · Recalled
- 3 generations backK022549 Restoration Modular SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2002 · Recalled
- 2 generations backK090757 Biomet Modular Femoral Revision SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2009 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK130063 Arcos Trochanter ButtonBiomet, Inc. · 2013
- This deviceK190100 USTAR II SystemUnited Orthopedic Corporation · 2019
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK252303 Stem Extension Line (USTAR II System)United Orthopedic Corporation · 2025
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK243656 U2 Total Knee System – PF+ Patella; USTAR II System– PF+ PatellaUnited Orthopedic Corporation · 2025
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −7 | K921308 | HG Multilock Hip Prosthesis W/ TI-Nidium | Zimmer, Inc. | 1994 | 1 |
| −6 | K972893 | Partnership Revision Femoral Stems | Howmedica Corp. | 1997 | — |
| −5 | K983404 | Type 3 Femoral Components | Howmedica Corp. | 1998 | 1 |
| −4 | K013106 | 2 Piece Modular Hip Stem | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | 2002 | 37 |
| −3 | K022549 | Restoration Modular System | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | 2002 | 3 |
| −2 | K090757 | Biomet Modular Femoral Revision System | Biomet, Inc. | 2009 | 18 |
| −1 | K130063 | Arcos Trochanter Button | Biomet, Inc. | 2013 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K190100 | USTAR II System | United Orthopedic Corporation | 2019 | — |
| +1 | K252303 | Stem Extension Line (USTAR II System) | United Orthopedic Corporation | 2025 | — |
| +1 | K243656 | U2 Total Knee System – PF+ Patella; USTAR II System– PF+ Patella | United Orthopedic Corporation | 2025 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1987 | 1 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1 | 0 |
| 1994 | 2 | 0 |
| 1995 | 7 | 0 |
| 1996 | 7 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1 | 0 |
| 2000 | 6 | 0 |
| 2001 | 1 | 0 |
| 2002 | 3 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1 | 0 |
| 2005 | 4 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in KRO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new KRO device
- #1 K251665 Triathlon® Hinge Knee Systemscore 19.0 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (9)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K082424 | United U2 Total Knee SystemSummary page 5…CFR 888.3358) Regulatory Class Class II Product Code(s) KRO, LPH, LWJ, KWL Predicate Device(s) 1. “United” U2 Total Knee System – PSA Type (K082424, K100981, K122183) 2. “Zimmer” NexGen® Complete Knee Solution Rotating… | 2008 |
| * | K100981 | United Stem, Psa TypeSummary page 5…Class II Product Code(s) KRO, LPH, LWJ, KWL Predicate Device(s) 1. “United” U2 Total Knee System – PSA Type (K082424, K100981, K122183) 2. “Zimmer” NexGen® Complete Knee Solution Rotating Hinge Knee (K… | 2010 |
| * | K122183 | Augment and Screw, Psa TypeSummary page 5…ss II Product Code(s) KRO, LPH, LWJ, KWL Predicate Device(s) 1. “United” U2 Total Knee System – PSA Type (K082424, K100981, K122183) 2. “Zimmer” NexGen® Complete Knee Solution Rotating Hinge Knee (K013385)… | 2013 |
| * | K013385 | Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Rotatng Hinge KneeSummary page 5…82424, K100981, K122183) 2. “Zimmer” NexGen® Complete Knee Solution Rotating Hinge Knee (K013385) 3. “Zimmer” Zimmer® Segmental System (K070978, K110940)… | 2002 |
| * | K070978 | Zimmer Segmental SystemSummary page 5…2. “Zimmer” NexGen® Complete Knee Solution Rotating Hinge Knee (K013385) 3. “Zimmer” Zimmer® Segmental System (K070978, K110940) K190100 - Page 2 of… | 2007 |
| * | K110940 | Zimmer Segment System Trabecular Metal Proximal Tibial Component, Trabecular Metal…Summary page 5…ee Solution Rotating Hinge Knee (K013385) 3. “Zimmer” Zimmer® Segmental System (K070978, K110940) K190100 - Page 2 of 6 4. “Biom… | 2011 |
| * | K002757 | Oncology Salvage SystemSummary page 6…K110940) K190100 - Page 2 of 6 4. “Biomet” Orthopaedic Salvage System (K002757, K052685) 5. “Zimmer” Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System (K1… | 2000 |
| * | K052685 | Orthopedic Salvage System- OssSummary page 6…K190100 - Page 2 of 6 4. “Biomet” Orthopaedic Salvage System (K002757, K052685) 5. “Zimmer” Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System (K130063) Reference Device(s) 1.… | 2005 |
| * | K130063 | Arcos Trochanter ButtonSummary page 6…iomet” Orthopaedic Salvage System (K002757, K052685) 5. “Zimmer” Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System (K130063) Reference Device(s) 1. “United” UTF Stem, reduced, Ti plasma spray (K123550) 2.… | 2013 |
| † | K123550 | Utf Stem, Reduced | 2013 |
| † | K152530 | UCP Stem | 2016 |
| † | K111546 | U2 Hip System | 2011 |
| † | K023087 | Global Modular Replacement System (GMRS) | 2002 |
| † | K100048 | E1 Antioxidant Infused Technology | 2010 |
What descends from it? (2)
2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | Class II | Z-2884-2026 | Process design | Due to an incomplete process of the component screw by a subcontractor which prevents the properly assembling of stem trail. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | Class II | Z-1216-2024 | Nonconforming Material/Component | Their is a potential that the implant curved stem may be oriented incorrectly. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | Class II | Z-1217-2024 | Nonconforming Material/Component | Their is a potential that the implant curved stem may be oriented incorrectly. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | Class II | Z-1215-2024 | Nonconforming Material/Component | Their is a potential that the implant curved stem may be oriented incorrectly. |
| Aug 27, 2021 | Class II | Z-0110-2022 | Device Design | Due to product not meeting specification for concentricity and failing to meet requirements of dynamic fatigue testing. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.6 years on median.
- 30 of the 53 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K252303 (United Orthopedic Corporation, 2025) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
- 8 other devices also cite its predicate K082424.
How does its category compare?
All KRO devicesKRO Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2019, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · KRO
3in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · KRO
56in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · KRO
14so far in 2026, the most since 2007
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · KRO
915in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code KRO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 1 | — | 1 | 37 |
| 2008 | 3 | 126 | 3 | 44 |
| 2009 | 3 | 86 | 8 | 66 |
| 2010 | 1 | — | 0 | 110 |
| 2011 | 2 | — | 1 | 119 |
| 2012 | 2 | — | 1 | 173 |
| 2013 | 3 | 189 | 2 | 194 |
| 2014 | 2 | — | 0 | 406 |
| 2015 | 6 | 113 | 1 | 333 |
| 2016 | 3 | 148 | 5 | 369 |
| 2017 | 1 | — | 4 | 543 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 1 | 614 |
| 2019 | 3 | 244 | 0 | 759 |
| 2020 | 1 | — | 0 | 749 |
| 2021 | 3 | 57 | 1 | 770 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 892 |
| 2023 | 4 | 148 | 0 | 746 |
| 2024 | 3 | 87 | 0 | 855 |
| 2025 | 3 | 56 | 1 | 915 |
| 2026 | 1 | — | 14 | — |
What is it indicated for?
USTAR II Knee System 1. Metastatic tumor (i.e. osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, giant cell tumor or osteoma) where massive resection and transplantation are needed. 2. Severe knee joint damage resulting from trauma where massive resection and transplantation are needed. 3. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, or traumatic arthritis. 4. Revision of previously failed total joint arthroplasty, osteotomy, or…
Read the full statement (328 words)
USTAR II Knee System
1. Metastatic tumor (i.e. osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, giant cell tumor or osteoma) where massive resection and transplantation are needed.
2. Severe knee joint damage resulting from trauma where massive resection and transplantation are needed.
3. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, or traumatic arthritis.
4. Revision of previously failed total joint arthroplasty, osteotomy, or arthrodesis.
5. Joint instability resulting from excessive bone resection.
For Femoral component, Hinged/ Tibial baseplate, Hinged/ Cemented tibial stem/ Cemented Straight stem, RHS, non coated/ Cemented Curved stem, RHS, non coated/ Cemented Straight stem, RHS/ Cemented Curved stem, RHS/ Tibial Augment: These devices are single use implant and intended for cemented use only.
For Distal Femoral Component, RHS/ Proximal Tibial Component, RHS/ Tibial stem/ Segment Part, RHS/ Segment Part, RHS, Bridge: These devices are single use implant and intended for cementless use only.
USTAR II Knee System, Stem
1. Metastatic tumor (i.e. osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, giant cell tumor or osteoma) resulting from trauma where massive resection and transplantation are needed.
2. Severe knee joint damage resulting from trauma where massive resection and transplantation are needed.
3. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, or traumatic arthritis.
4. Correction for revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or failure of previous joint replacement.
5. Joint instability resulting from excessive bone resection.
Cemented Tibial Stem is a single use implant and intended for cemented use only.
Tibial Stem is a single use implant and intended for cementless use only.
USTAR II Hip System
1. Metastatic tumor (i.e. osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, giant cell tumor or osteoma) where massive resection and transplantation are needed.
2. Severe knee joint damage resulting from trauma where massive resection and transplantation are needed.
3. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, or traumatic arthritis.
4. Revision of previously failed total joint arthroplasty, osteotomy, or arthrodesis.
5. Joint instability resulting from excessive bone resection.
This device is a single use implant and intended for cementless use only.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K190100 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K190100: USTAR II System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K190100
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026