510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Epicage Interbody Fusion Device

K092901510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 28, 2010219-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

R Tree Innovations · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Apr 28, 2010 as substantially equivalent to P950002 (Zimmer Spine, Inc., 1996) and 3 other predicates after a 219-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1996. 1 of the 614 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 609 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 28, 2010
Review
219 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to P950002 (1996). 4 ancestors in all. 609 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly. 1 of the 614 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2009: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor2013: 2 descendants cleared2014: 6 descendants cleared2016: 22 descendants cleared2017: 29 descendants cleared2015: 8 descendants cleared2019: 44 descendants cleared2026: 59 descendants cleared2018: 31 descendants cleared2020: 65 descendants cleared2021: 51 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12022: 61 descendants cleared2025: 72 descendants cleared2024: 83 descendants cleared2023: 76 descendants clearedP950002 · Bak Interbody Fusion System · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 19961995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 5 descendants3 generations forward: 10 descendants4 generations forward: 30 descendants5 generations forward: 83 descendants6 generations forward: 154 descendants, 1 with a Class I recall17 generations forward: 149 descendants8 generations forward: 95 descendants9 generations forward: 49 descendants10 generations forward: 23 descendants11 generations forward: 6 descendants12 generations forward: 2 descendants P950002 · Bak Interbody Fusion System · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 19960+5+10
  1. Root · 1 generation backP950002 Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996
  2. This deviceK092901 Epicage Interbody Fusion DeviceR Tree Innovations · 2010
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 602 of its ownK130548 Epicage Interbody Fusion DeviceAlphatec Spine, Inc. · 2013
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 596 of its ownK132601 Coroent Sterile Implants SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2013
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 590 of its ownK140319 Coroent TI-C SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2014
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 588 of its ownK141665 NuVasive CoRoent SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2015
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 483 of its ownK140659 Coroent Thoracolumbar ImplantsNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2014

Showing 5 of 609 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2013: 22014: 62015: 82016: 222017: 292018: 312019: 442020: 652021: 512022: 612023: 762024: 832025: 722026: 59
2013high 83 (2024) · low 2 (2013)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 609 · See all
  • K130548Epicage Interbody Fusion DeviceAlphatec Spine, Inc. · 2013 · cites it directly602descendants
  • K132601Coroent Sterile Implants SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2013 · 2 generations on596descendants
  • K140319Coroent TI-C SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2014 · 3 generations on590descendants
  • K141665NuVasive CoRoent SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2015 · 3 generations on588descendants
  • K140659Coroent Thoracolumbar ImplantsNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2014 · 3 generations on483descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1P950002Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc.1996—
0 (this device)K092901Epicage Interbody Fusion DeviceR Tree Innovations2010—
+1K130548Epicage Interbody Fusion DeviceAlphatec Spine, Inc.2013—
+2K132601Coroent Sterile Implants SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated2013—
+3K140319Coroent TI-C SystemNuvasive, Inc.2014—
+3K141665NuVasive CoRoent SystemNuvasive, Inc.2015—
+3K140659Coroent Thoracolumbar ImplantsNu Vasive, Incorporated2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199910
200910

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201320
201460
201580
2016220
2017290
2018310
2019440
2020650
2021511
2022610
2023760
2024830
2025720
2026590
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K092901, 1996–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*P950002Bak Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 1
…ly cleared devices and has the same indications for use, design, function, and materials used. The predicate devices include the BAK Interbody Fusion Device (Spine-Tech, P950002), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019), the Brantigan Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025) and the ROI-T device from LDR (K082262) === Pa…
Zimmer Spine, Inc.1996—
*P950019Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (TFC)(TM) with Instrumentation
Summary page 1
…cations for use, design, function, and materials used. The predicate devices include the BAK Interbody Fusion Device (Spine-Tech, P950002), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019), the Brantigan Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025) and the ROI-T device from LDR (K082262)…
Stryker Spine19961
*P960025Brantigen I/F Cage (R) Used with VSP (R) Spine Plates and Pedicle Screws
Summary page 1
…terials used. The predicate devices include the BAK Interbody Fusion Device (Spine-Tech, P950002), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019), the Brantigan Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025) and the ROI-T device from LDR (K082262)…
Depuy Spine, Inc.1999—
*K082262LDR Spine Roi Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 1
…ude the BAK Interbody Fusion Device (Spine-Tech, P950002), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019), the Brantigan Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025) and the ROI-T device from LDR (K082262) koqt¶OIot Pe…
Ldr Spine USA20091

Also cleared against P950002: 34 other devices →

What descends from it? (609)

See all 609

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K130548Epicage Interbody Fusion DeviceAlphatec Spine, Inc.2013602
K142023Luna Interbody SystemBenvenue Medical, Inc.20145
K132907Plif Lite and Tlif LiteSintea Plustek20140

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 6 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • 2 of the 4 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K130548 (Alphatec Spine, Inc., 2013) has gone furthest, with 602 descendants of its own.
  • 34 other devices also cite its predicate P950002.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The Epicage Interbody Fusion Device is intended for interbody fusion procedures and is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the devices. The device is intended to be used with supplemental posterior fixation. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). It is indicated to be used with autograft bone.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K092901: Epicage Interbody Fusion Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K092901

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026