510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Eturn Spinal Implant Model Eturn XX-12; Eturn XX-16 Where XX=07, 09, 11, 13, or 15 and Eturn XX-12 K; Eturn XX-16 K Wher

K100305510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 21, 2011533-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Icotec · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jul 21, 2011 as substantially equivalent to P960025 (Depuy Spine, Inc., 1999) and 2 other predicates after a 533-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1984. 8 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 21, 2011
Review
533 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K841189 (1984). 11 ancestors in all. 8 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2008: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor2018: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant clearedK841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K022793 (2003), K031757 (2003) K041888 · Curved Peek Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004K043316 · Rabea Spinal Implant · Signus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2005K052533 · Kimba Spinal Implant · Signus Medizintechnik GmbH · 200519801990200020102020
  1. Root · 8 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 7 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 6 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 5 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 4 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 3 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 2 generations backK043316 Rabea Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2005
  8. 1 generation backK052533 Kimba Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2005
  9. This deviceK100305 Eturn Spinal Implant Model Eturn XX-12; Eturn XX-16 Where XX=07, 09…Icotec · 2011
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 5 of its ownK172480 icotec Interbody Cage SystemIcotec AG · 2018
  11. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK193378 CarboClear Lumbar Cage SystemCarboFix Orthopedics, Ltd. · 2020
  12. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK203683 CarboClear Lumbar Cage SystemCarbofix Orthpedics, Ltd. · 2021
  13. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK192897 icotec Cervical CageIcotec AG · 2020
  14. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK133126 K7 Lumbar SpacersK7, LLC · 2013

Showing 5 of 8 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2013: 12017: 12018: 12020: 22021: 12023: 12024: 1
2013high 2 (2020) · low 0 (2014)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 8 · See all
  • K172480icotec Interbody Cage SystemIcotec AG · 2018 · cites it directly5descendants
  • K193378CarboClear Lumbar Cage SystemCarboFix Orthopedics, Ltd. · 2020 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K203683CarboClear Lumbar Cage SystemCarbofix Orthpedics, Ltd. · 2021 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K192897icotec Cervical CageIcotec AG · 2020 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K133126K7 Lumbar SpacersK7, LLC · 2013 · cites it directly1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−7K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−6K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−5K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−4K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−3K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−2K043316Rabea Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2005—
−1K052533Kimba Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2005—
0 (this device)K100305Eturn Spinal Implant Model Eturn XX-12; Eturn XX-16 Where XX=07, 09, 11, 13…Icotec2011—
+1K172480icotec Interbody Cage SystemIcotec AG2018—
+2K193378CarboClear Lumbar Cage SystemCarboFix Orthopedics, Ltd.2020—
+2K203683CarboClear Lumbar Cage SystemCarbofix Orthpedics, Ltd.2021—
+2K192897icotec Cervical CageIcotec AG2020—
+1K133126K7 Lumbar SpacersK7, LLC2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200010
200810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201310
201710
201810
202020
202110
202310
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K100305, 1984–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*P960025Brantigen I/F Cage (R) Used with VSP (R) Spine Plates and Pedicle Screws
Summary page 1
…n device Classification: Class 11, Intervertebral Body Fusion Device, 21 CFR 888.3080 Product Code: MAX Predicate Lumbar INF Cage System (P960025) Device(s): KIMBA Tm Spinal Implant (K052533) IMBATM mini (K080349) Device…
Depuy Spine, Inc.1999—
*K052533Kimba Spinal Implant
Summary page 1
…Body Fusion Device, 21 CFR 888.3080 Product Code: MAX Predicate Lumbar INF Cage System (P960025) Device(s): KIMBA Tm Spinal Implant (K052533) IMBATM mini (K080349) Device The icotec ETurn Spinal Implant is a hollow, curved frame…
Signus Medizintechnik GmbH2005—
*K080349Kimba Mini
Summary page 1
…e: MAX Predicate Lumbar INF Cage System (P960025) Device(s): KIMBA Tm Spinal Implant (K052533) IMBATM mini (K080349) Device The icotec ETurn Spinal Implant is a hollow, curved frame spinal implant comprised Description:…
Signus Medizintechnik GmbH2008—

Also cleared against P960025: 98 other devices →

What descends from it? (8)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K172480icotec Interbody Cage SystemIcotec AG20185
K133126K7 Lumbar SpacersK7, LLC20131

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 27 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • None of the 11 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K172480 (Icotec AG, 2018) has gone furthest, with 5 descendants of its own.
  • 98 other devices also cite its predicate P960025.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The ETurn spinal implant is indicated for spinal fuision procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) in the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S 1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level. The ETurn devices are to be used with…

Read the full statement (117 words)

The ETurn spinal implant is indicated for spinal fuision procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) in the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S 1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level. The ETurn devices are to be used with autogenous bone graft. Patients should have had at least six (6) months of non-operative care prior to treatment with this device.

The ETumn spinal implant is intended for use with supplemental fixation such as posterior fixation by pedicle screws and rods.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K100305: Eturn Spinal Implant Model Eturn XX-12; Eturn XX-16 Where XX=07, 09, 11, 13, or 15 and Eturn XX-12 K; Eturn XX-16 K Wher.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K100305

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026