510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

II-Type Intervertebral Spacer

K180228510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 11, 2019350-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Paonan Biotech Co., Ltd. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jan 11, 2019 as substantially equivalent to P960025 (Depuy Spine, Inc., 1999) and 2 other predicates after a 350-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 1984. 1 of the 42 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jan 11, 2019
Review
350 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K841189 (1984). 40 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly. 1 of the 42 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 7 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  4. 2 generations backK073177 Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemPioneer Surgical Technology · 2008 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK103111 Forza Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2011 · Recalled
  6. This deviceK180228 II-Type Intervertebral SpacerPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd. · 2019
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK233075 “BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 CageBiogend Therapeutics Co., Ltd. · 2024
Show all 11 generations
  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 10 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 9 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 8 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 7 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 6 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 5 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 4 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  9. 3 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  10. 2 generations backK073177 Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemPioneer Surgical Technology · 2008 · Recalled
  11. 1 generation backK103111 Forza Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2011 · Recalled
  12. This deviceK180228 II-Type Intervertebral SpacerPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd. · 2019

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K233075“BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 CageBiogend Therapeutics Co., Ltd. · 2024 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−11K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−10K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−9K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−8K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−7K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−6K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−5K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−4K062759Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−3K072120Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−2K073177Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemPioneer Surgical Technology20081
−1K103111Forza Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc.20111
0 (this device)K180228II-Type Intervertebral SpacerPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd.2019—
+1K233075“BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 CageBiogend Therapeutics Co., Ltd.2024—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199920
200010
200140
200240
200320
200440
200510
200610
200740
200831
200910

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K180228, 1984–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*P960025Brantigen I/F Cage (R) Used with VSP (R) Spine Plates and Pedicle Screws
Summary page 4
…oduct Code: MAX Predicate Devices: Primary predicate device: Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025) Additional predicates: Capstone Spinal System (K073291)…
Depuy Spine, Inc.1999—
*K073291Capstone Spinal System
Summary page 4
…/F Cage (P960025) Additional predicates: Capstone Spinal System (K073291) FORZA Spacer System (K103111) Device Description: II-Type Intervertebral Spacer consists of…
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2008—
*K103111Forza Spacer System
Summary page 4
…Additional predicates: Capstone Spinal System (K073291) FORZA Spacer System (K103111) Device Description: II-Type Intervertebral Spacer consists of PEEK cages of various widths and heights, which include Ta marke…
Orthofix, Inc.20111

Also cleared against P960025: 98 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K233075“BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 CageBiogend Therapeutics Co., Ltd.20240

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · 2 generations back · ◆ in the 2008 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 35 years and passes through 10 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • 9 of the 40 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K233075 (Biogend Therapeutics Co., Ltd., 2024) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 98 other devices also cite its predicate P960025.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2019, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The II-Type Intervertebral Spacer is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. This device is to be used with autograft bone and/or allograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These…

Read the full statement (136 words)

The II-Type Intervertebral Spacer is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with

degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. This device is to be used with autograft

bone and/or allograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. DDD is defined as discogenic

back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients may also

have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). Patients should have at least six months of

non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage. The II-Type Intervertebral Spacer is to be

implanted via a direct posterior approach. These devices are intended to be used with supplemental fixation

instrumentation, which has been cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K180228: II-Type Intervertebral Spacer.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K180228

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026