510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

STCC

K100698510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 14, 2011368-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cardinal Spine, LLC · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Mar 14, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K091088 (Ldr Spine USA, 2009) and 2 other predicates after a 368-day review. Its family tree reaches back 10 generations to 1984. 346 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Mar 14, 2011
Review
368 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 10 generations to K841189 (1984). 34 ancestors in all. 346 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2008: 2 other ancestors2007: 2 other ancestors2002: 5 other ancestors2001: 8 other ancestors2005: 1 other ancestor2004: 3 other ancestors1996: 1 other ancestor2003: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2015: 6 descendants cleared2016: 4 descendants cleared2017: 11 descendants cleared2024: 43 descendants cleared2020: 34 descendants cleared2018: 13 descendants cleared2019: 19 descendants cleared2023: 49 descendants cleared2021: 31 descendants cleared2022: 41 descendants cleared2026: 45 descendants cleared2025: 47 descendants clearedK841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K022793 (2003), K031757 (2003) K033109 · Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body Replacements · Scient'X · 2004K043479 · MC+ Partial VBR · Ldr Spine USA · 2005K080728 · LDR Spine Roi-C Implant · Ldr Spine USA · 2008×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K083857 (2009), K091088 (2009) 19801990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors2 generations back: 4 other ancestors3 generations back: 5 other ancestors4 generations back: 5 other ancestors5 generations back: 6 other ancestors6 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 4 descendants3 generations forward: 11 descendants4 generations forward: 29 descendants5 generations forward: 60 descendants6 generations forward: 66 descendants7 generations forward: 65 descendants8 generations forward: 49 descendants9 generations forward: 36 descendants10 generations forward: 18 descendants11 generations forward: 5 descendants12 generations forward: 2 descendants K091088 · LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System · Ldr Spine USA · 2009K083857 · LDR Spine Roi-C Implant · Ldr Spine USA · 2009K080728 · LDR Spine Roi-C Implant · Ldr Spine USA · 2008K043479 · MC+ Partial VBR · Ldr Spine USA · 2005K033109 · Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body Replacements · Scient'X · 2004K031757 · Peek Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medical, LLC · 2003K022793 · Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medical, LLC · 2003K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984−10−50+5+10
  1. Root · 10 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 6 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK080728 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2008
  4. 2 generations backK083857 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2009
  5. 1 generation backK091088 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA · 2009
  6. This deviceK100698 STCCCardinal Spine, LLC · 2011
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 345 of its ownK111439 Chesapeake (Cervical Components)K2m, Inc. · 2011 · Recalled
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 330 of its ownK133494 Chesapeake Spinal SystemK2m, Inc. · 2014
  9. Descendant · 3 generations on · 315 of its ownK160125 Cascadia Interbody SystemK2m · 2016
  10. Descendant · 4 generations on · 169 of its ownK162264 Cascadia Interbody SystemK2m, Inc. · 2016
  11. Descendant · 4 generations on · 145 of its ownK171140 Matrixx SystemNexxt Spine, LLC · 2017
Show all 10 generations
  1. Root · 10 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 9 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 8 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 7 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 6 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 5 generations backK033109 Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X · 2004
  7. 4 generations backK043479 MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA · 2005
  8. 3 generations backK080728 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2008
  9. 2 generations backK083857 LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA · 2009
  10. 1 generation backK091088 LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA · 2009
  11. This deviceK100698 STCCCardinal Spine, LLC · 2011

Showing 5 of 346 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 12014: 22015: 62016: 42017: 112018: 132019: 192020: 342021: 312022: 412023: 492024: 432025: 472026: 45
2011high 49 (2023) · low 0 (2012)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 346 · See all
  • K111439Chesapeake (Cervical Components)K2m, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly345descendants
  • K133494Chesapeake Spinal SystemK2m, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on330descendants
  • K160125Cascadia Interbody SystemK2m · 2016 · 3 generations on315descendants
  • K162264Cascadia Interbody SystemK2m, Inc. · 2016 · 4 generations on169descendants
  • K171140Matrixx SystemNexxt Spine, LLC · 2017 · 4 generations on145descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−10K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−9K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−8K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−7K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−6K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−5K033109Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X2004—
−4K043479MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA2005—
−3K080728LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA2008—
−2K083857LDR Spine Roi-C ImplantLdr Spine USA2009—
−1K091088LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemLdr Spine USA2009—
0 (this device)K100698STCCCardinal Spine, LLC2011—
+1K111439Chesapeake (Cervical Components)K2m, Inc.20111
+2K133494Chesapeake Spinal SystemK2m, Inc.2014—
+3K160125Cascadia Interbody SystemK2m2016—
+4K162264Cascadia Interbody SystemK2m, Inc.2016—
+4K171140Matrixx SystemNexxt Spine, LLC2017—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
200010
200180
200250
200310
200430
200510
200720
200820

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201420
201560
201640
2017110
2018130
2019190
2020340
2021310
2022410
2023490
2024430
2025470
2026450
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K100698, 1984–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K091088LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 2
…substantially equivalent in indications, design principles, materials and performance to the following predicate devices: the LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System (K091088) from LDR Spine USA, the Synthes Zero-P (K07298 1) from Synthes Spine, and the Novel® Spinal Spacer System (K08 1730) from Alphat…
Ldr Spine USA2009—
*K072981Synthes Zero-P
Summary page 2
…rinciples, materials and performance to the following predicate devices: the LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System (K091088) from LDR Spine USA, the Synthes Zero-P (K07298 1) from Synthes Spine, and the Novel® Spinal Spacer System (K08 1730) from Alphatec Spine, Inc.…
Synthes Spine Co.Lp20082
*K081730Novel Cervical Spinal Spacer System
Summary page 2
…ices: the LDR Spine Cervical Interbody Fusion System (K091088) from LDR Spine USA, the Synthes Zero-P (K07298 1) from Synthes Spine, and the Novel® Spinal Spacer System (K08 1730) from Alphatec Spine, Inc.…
Alphatec Spine, Inc.2008—

Also cleared against K091088: 50 other devices →

What descends from it? (346)

See all 346

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K111439Chesapeake (Cervical Components)K2m, Inc.2011345

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 27 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • 5 of the 34 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K111439 (K2m, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 345 descendants of its own.
  • 50 other devices also cite its predicate K091088.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

The STCC is intended to be used as an adjunct to spinal fusion procedures at one level (C2-T1) in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as neck pain with discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) of the cervical spine. Patients should have received at least six weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the device. Devices are intended to be implanted via an anterior approach and used with autogenous bone graft and supplemental fixation, such as an anterior plating system.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K100698: STCC.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K100698

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026