510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

TM Ardis Interbody System Inserter

K123602510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 1, 2013100-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Mar 1, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K113561 (Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology, 2012) after a 100-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1996. 1 of the 11 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Mar 1, 2013
Review
100 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to P950002 (1996). 9 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly. 1 of the 11 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2011: 1 other ancestor2007: 2 other ancestors2008: 1 other ancestor2002: 1 other ancestor2001: 1 other ancestor2024: 1 descendant clearedP950002 · Bak Interbody Fusion System · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996K073202 · Ardis Spacer · Abbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · Class I recallK113561 · TM Ardis Interbody System TM Ardis Interbody System Instrumenation · Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2012 · recalled1995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 2 other ancestors3 generations back: 4 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K113561 · TM Ardis Interbody System TM Ardis Interbody System Instrumenation · Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2012 · recalledK073202 · Ardis Spacer · Abbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · Class I recallP950002 · Bak Interbody Fusion System · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 19960
  1. Root · 3 generations backP950002 Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996
  2. 2 generations backK073202 Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled (Class I)
  3. 1 generation backK113561 TM Ardis Interbody System TM Ardis Interbody System InstrumenationZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2012 · Recalled
  4. This deviceK123602 TM Ardis Interbody System InserterZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2013
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK241073 DZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceShenzhen Dazhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd. · 2024

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K241073DZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceShenzhen Dazhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd. · 2024 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3P950002Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc.1996—
−2K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc.2008Class I
−1K113561TM Ardis Interbody System TM Ardis Interbody System InstrumenationZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology20122
0 (this device)K123602TM Ardis Interbody System InserterZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology2013—
+1K241073DZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceShenzhen Dazhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd.2024—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110
200210
200720
200810
201110

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K123602, 1996–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K113561TM Ardis Interbody System TM Ardis Interbody System Instrumenation
Summary page 2
…nc. has submitted documentation demonstrating the substantial equivalence of the modified TM Ardis® Inserter instrument to the original version of the device included in K1 13561. The unmodified and modified versions of the TM Ardise Inserter instrument differ by a design change to th& Inserter Locking Nut…
Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology20122

Also cleared against K113561: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K241073DZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceShenzhen Dazhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd.20240

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · 2 generations back · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.3 years on median.
  • 2 of the 9 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K241073 (Shenzhen Dazhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd., 2024) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K113561.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The TM Ardis® Interbody System is indicated for use with autogenous bone graftas an intervertebral body fuision device at one or two contiguous levels in the lumbosacral region (L2-SI1) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DOD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients with previous…

Read the full statement (122 words)

The TM Ardis® Interbody System is indicated for use with autogenous bone graftas an intervertebral body fuision device at one or two contiguous levels in the lumbosacral region (L2-SI1) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DOD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at involved level may be treated with the device. Patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment.

The TM Ardis® Interbody System device is implanted using a posterior or transforaminal approach and is intended to be used singly or in pairs with supplemental fixation.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K123602: TM Ardis Interbody System Inserter.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K123602

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026