510(k) · Cleared
ClearedDZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Shenzhen Dazhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on Dec 6, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K123602 (Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology, 2013) and 1 other predicate after a 231-day review. Its family tree reaches back 10 generations to 1984. 1 of the 26 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall.
- Decided
- Dec 6, 2024
- Review
- 231 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 10 generations to K841189 (1984). 25 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 1 of the 26 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.
- Root · 10 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
- 6 generations between
- 3 generations backK052746 Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2005
- 2 generations backK081917 Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard SystemsDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2009
- 1 generation backK111119 Trabecular Metal (TM) Fusion DeviceZimmer Spine, Inc. · 2011
- This deviceK241073 DZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceShenzhen Dazhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd. · 2024
Show all 10 generations
- Root · 10 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
- 9 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
- 8 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
- 7 generations backK020522 Modification to Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2002
- 6 generations backK030833 Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed · 2003
- 5 generations backK031635 Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed · 2003
- 4 generations backK041722 Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
- 3 generations backK052746 Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2005
- 2 generations backK081917 Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard SystemsDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2009
- 1 generation backK111119 Trabecular Metal (TM) Fusion DeviceZimmer Spine, Inc. · 2011
- This deviceK241073 DZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceShenzhen Dazhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd. · 2024
Class I recalls in this family
- K073202 Ardis Spacer3 generations back · 2008
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −10 | K841189 | Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator | Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. | 1984 | — |
| −9 | K990148 | Stackable Cage System | Depuy Motech Acromed | 1999 | — |
| −8 | K003043 | Surgical Titanium Mesh System | Depuyacromed | 2001 | — |
| −7 | K020522 | Modification to Surgical Titanium Mesh System | Depuyacromed | 2002 | — |
| −6 | K030833 | Depuy Acromed VBR System | Depuyacromed | 2003 | — |
| −5 | K031635 | Depuy Acromed VBR System | Depuyacromed | 2003 | — |
| −4 | K041722 | Modification to VBR Spinal System | Depuy Spine, Inc. | 2004 | — |
| −3 | K052746 | Concorde VBR Spinal System | Depuy Spine, Inc. | 2005 | — |
| −2 | K081917 | Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard Systems | Depuy Spine, Inc. | 2009 | — |
| −1 | K111119 | Trabecular Metal (TM) Fusion Device | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | 2011 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K241073 | DZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device | Shenzhen Dazhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd. | 2024 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 2 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3 | 1 |
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K123602 | TM Ardis Interbody System InserterSummary page 5…Class II Product Code: MAX, ODP 3. Predicate Device(s) Predicate device 1. Product Name: TM Ardis® Interbody System (K123602) Classification Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Common or Usual Name: Intervertebral Fusion Devi… | 2013 |
| * | K111119 | Trabecular Metal (TM) Fusion DeviceSummary page 6…Class II Product Code: MAX Predicate device 2. Product Name: Trabecular MetalTM Fusion Device (K111119) Classification Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Common or Usual Name: Intervertebral F… | 2011 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
Relatives with a Class I recall
Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.
- K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · 3 generations back · ◆ in the 2008 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 40 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
- 2 of the 25 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
DZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device can be divided into two types, CIF-PTA and LIF-PTA. The CIF-PTA is a cervical interbody fusion device indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with/ without radicular symptoms at one level from C2-T1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six weeks of non-operative…
Read the full statement (222 words)
DZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device can be divided into two types, CIF-PTA and LIF-PTA.
The CIF-PTA is a cervical interbody fusion device indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with/ without radicular symptoms at one level from C2-T1. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. The CIF-PTA is intended for use with supplemental fixation systems and with autogenous bone graft. The CIF-PTA is implanted via an anterior approach.
The LIF-PTA is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft as an intervertebral body fusion device at one or two contiguous levels in the lumbosacral region (L2-S1) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at involved level may be treated with the device. Patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. The LIF-PTA is implanted using a posterior approach and is intended to be used in pairs with supplemental fixation.
DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K241073 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K241073: DZ-Tabone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K241073
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026