510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Supervan 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging System

K131896510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 28, 2014248-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1000

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Suzhou Anke Medical System Co., Ltd. · LNH System, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Cleared on Feb 28, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K052013 (Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V., 2005) after a 248-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2003. 2 of the 4 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall.

Decided
Feb 28, 2014
Review
248 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LNH
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K031815 (2003). No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 2 of the 4 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK031815 Intera-Sensation FamilyPhilips Medical Systems · 2003 · Recalled
  2. 2 generations backK043147 Achieva FamilyPhilips Medical Systems North America Co. · 2005 · Recalled (Class I)
  3. 1 generation backK052013 Achieva 1.5T & Inera 1.5T FamilyPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2005 · Recalled (Class I)
  4. This deviceK131896 Supervan 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging SystemSuzhou Anke Medical System Co., Ltd. · 2014

Class I recalls in this family

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K031815Intera-Sensation FamilyPhilips Medical Systems20033
−2K043147Achieva FamilyPhilips Medical Systems North America Co.2005Class I
−1K052013Achieva 1.5T & Inera 1.5T FamilyPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.2005Class I
0 (this device)K131896Supervan 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging SystemSuzhou Anke Medical System Co., Ltd.2014—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K131896, 2003–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

2 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LNH device

  1. #1 K213693 MAGNETOM Vida with syngo MR XA50Ascore 23.0 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K052013Achieva 1.5T & Inera 1.5T Family
Summary page 2
…. These images when interpreted by a trained physician, yield information that may assist in diagnosis. 5. Predicate Device Identification 510(k) Number: K052013 Product Name: ACI tWFA 1.5-F & INThRA 1.5' famnily Manufacturer: Philips Medical Systems Nederland 13V 6.…
Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.2005Class I

Also cleared against K052013: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (2 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K052013Achieva 1.5T & Inera 1.5T FamilyPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2005 · Direct predicate · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 13 Class I recalls
  • K043147Achieva FamilyPhilips Medical Systems North America Co. · 2005 · 2 generations back · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 13 Class I recalls

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 11 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.4 years on median.
  • 3 of the 3 ancestors have a recall of any class; 2 have a Class I recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K052013.

How does its category compare?

All LNH devices

LNH System, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LNH

26in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 172010: 122011: 162012: 222013: 192014: 172015: 192016: 202017: 182018: 292019: 262020: 322021: 272022: 302023: 302024: 262025: 262026 (partial year): 24
2007high 32 (2020) · low 12 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LNH

122in 2025

2007: 35 days median2008: 53 days median2009: 70 days median2010: 94 days median2011: 81 days median2012: 89 days median2013: 108 days median2014: 108 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 108 days median2017: 98 days median2018: 128 days median2019: 62 days median2020: 121 days median2021: 87 days median2022: 74 days median2023: 124 days median2024: 104 days median2025: 122 days median2026 (partial year): 126 days median
2007high 140 (2015) · low 35 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LNH

8in 2025

2007: 252008: 122009: 72010: 172011: 112012: 52013: 22014: 132015: 12, 2 Class I2016: 12018: 712019: 52020: 42021: 412022: 132023: 10, 1 Class I2024: 42025: 8, 5 Class I2026 (partial year): 43
2007high 71 (2018) · low 0 (2017)2026

Class I (8 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LNH

1,263in 2025

2007: 1142008: 1672009: 1942010: 1652011: 1822012: 1702013: 1072014: 1192015: 1132016: 1352017: 1212018: 1582019: 1582020: 982021: 842022: 1382023: 1592024: 2812025: 1,263
2007high 1,263 (2025) · low 84 (2021)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LNH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007123525114
2008195312167
200917707194
2010129417165
2011168111182
201222895170
2013191082107
20141710813119
20151914012 (2)113
2016201081135
201718980121
20182912871158
201926625158
202032121498
202127874184
2022307413138
20233012410 (1)159
2024261044281
2025261228 (5)1,263
20262412643—

What is it indicated for?

SuperVan 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging System is a MRI system that produces transversal, sagittal and coronal and oblique cross-section images of the internal structure of the whole body. The images produced by the SuperVan 1.5T system reflect the spatial distribution of protons (hydrogen nuclei) exhibiting magnetic resonance. The NMR properties that determine the image appearance are proton density, spin-lattice relaxation time (T1), spin-spin relaxation time (T2) and flow. These images when interpreted by a trained physician, yield information that may assist in diagnosis.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K131896: Supervan 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K131896

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026