510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Infix Anterior Lumbar System

K132790510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 20, 2013105-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zimmer Spine, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Dec 20, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K031672 (Spinal Concepts, Inc., 2003) and 1 other predicate after a 105-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2001. 1 of the 35 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 28 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 20, 2013
Review
105 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K010530 (2001). 6 ancestors in all, the oldest P950002 (1996). 28 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly. 1 of the 35 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2008: 1 other ancestor, 1 with a Class I recall12003: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor2023: 2 descendants cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2024: 5 descendants cleared2022: 2 descendants cleared2021: 2 descendants cleared2025: 6 descendants cleared2026: 2 descendants clearedK010530 · Geo Structure · Interpore Cross Intl. · 2001K020048 · Modification to Geo Structure · Interpore Cross Intl. · 2002K031672 · Spinal Concepts, Inc. Infix System · Spinal Concepts, Inc. · 20031995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor, 1 with a Class I recall12 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 5 descendants2 generations forward: 6 descendants3 generations forward: 7 descendants4 generations forward: 9 descendants5 generations forward: 1 descendant K031672 · Spinal Concepts, Inc. Infix System · Spinal Concepts, Inc. · 2003K020048 · Modification to Geo Structure · Interpore Cross Intl. · 2002K010530 · Geo Structure · Interpore Cross Intl. · 20010+5
  1. Root · 3 generations backK010530 Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl. · 2001
  2. 2 generations backK020048 Modification to Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl. · 2002
  3. 1 generation backK031672 Spinal Concepts, Inc. Infix SystemSpinal Concepts, Inc. · 2003
  4. This deviceK132790 Infix Anterior Lumbar SystemZimmer Spine, Inc. · 2013
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 19 of its ownK143297 Ardis Interbody System, BAK Interbody Fusion System, BAK/C Anterior…Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 2015
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 11 of its ownK162986 SPIRA Open Matrix ALIFCamber Spine Technologies · 2017
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 10 of its ownK180724 SPIRA Open Matrix LLIFCamber Spine Technologies, LLC · 2018
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 9 of its ownK190483 SPIRA Open Matrix ALIF and LLIFCamber Spine Technologies · 2019
  9. Descendant · cites it directly · 5 of its ownK231199 Solar Lumbar Interbody Fusion SystemDegen Medical · 2023

Showing 5 of 28 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2015: 12016: 12017: 22018: 22019: 12020: 22021: 22022: 22023: 22024: 52025: 62026: 2
2015high 6 (2025) · low 1 (2015)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 28 · See all
  • K143297Ardis Interbody System, BAK Interbody Fusion System, BAK/C Anterior Cervical Interbody…Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 2015 · cites it directly19descendants
  • K162986SPIRA Open Matrix ALIFCamber Spine Technologies · 2017 · cites it directly11descendants
  • K180724SPIRA Open Matrix LLIFCamber Spine Technologies, LLC · 2018 · 2 generations on10descendants
  • K190483SPIRA Open Matrix ALIF and LLIFCamber Spine Technologies · 2019 · 2 generations on9descendants
  • K231199Solar Lumbar Interbody Fusion SystemDegen Medical · 2023 · cites it directly5descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K010530Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl.2001—
−2K020048Modification to Geo StructureInterpore Cross Intl.2002—
−1K031672Spinal Concepts, Inc. Infix SystemSpinal Concepts, Inc.2003—
0 (this device)K132790Infix Anterior Lumbar SystemZimmer Spine, Inc.2013—
+1K143297Ardis Interbody System, BAK Interbody Fusion System, BAK/C Anterior Cervical…Zimmer Spine, Inc.2015—
+1K162986SPIRA Open Matrix ALIFCamber Spine Technologies2017—
+2K180724SPIRA Open Matrix LLIFCamber Spine Technologies, LLC2018—
+2K190483SPIRA Open Matrix ALIF and LLIFCamber Spine Technologies2019—
+1K231199Solar Lumbar Interbody Fusion SystemDegen Medical2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
200310
200811

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201510
201610
201720
201820
201910
202020
202120
202220
202320
202450
202560
202620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K132790, 2001–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K031672Spinal Concepts, Inc. Infix System
Summary page 2
…Names Number _ _______ lnFix)' Anterior Lumbar Device (System) Original/Applicant Spinal Concepts K031672 August 07, 2003 Product Code: MOP Ardis Spacer Original Applicant Abbott Spine…
Spinal Concepts, Inc.2003—
*K073202Ardis Spacer
Summary page 2
…inal Concepts K031672 August 07, 2003 Product Code: MOP Ardis Spacer Original Applicant Abbott Spine K073202 January 30, 2008 Product Code: MAX General Device Description: The InFix System is comprised of impla…
Abbott Spine, Inc.2008Class I

Also cleared against K031672: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (28)

See all 28

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K143297Ardis Interbody System, BAK Interbody Fusion System, BAK/C Anterior Cervical Interbody…Zimmer Spine, Inc.201519
K162986SPIRA Open Matrix ALIFCamber Spine Technologies201711
K231199Solar Lumbar Interbody Fusion SystemDegen Medical20235
K200958MODULIF-A Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion SystemSpinal Stability, LLC20200
K180695FBC 921 (Alif)Fbc Device Aps20180

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · Direct predicate · ◆ in the 2008 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 12 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.5 years on median.
  • 1 of the 6 ancestors has a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K143297 (Zimmer Spine, Inc., 2015) has gone furthest, with 19 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K031672.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a vertebral body replacement device, the InFix® System is intended for use in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine (T3-L5) to replace a collapsed, damaged or unstable vertebral body resected or excised (i.e.. partial verlebrectomy procedures) due to tumor or trauma (i.e., fracture). The InFix is designed to restore the biomnechanical integrity of the anterior and middle spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a prolonged period. the…

Read the full statement (217 words)

When used as a vertebral body replacement device, the InFix® System is intended for use in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine (T3-L5) to replace a collapsed, damaged or unstable vertebral body resected or excised (i.e.. partial verlebrectomy procedures) due to tumor or trauma (i.e., fracture). The InFix is designed to restore the biomnechanical integrity of the anterior and middle spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a prolonged period. the InFix implant is intended to be used with bone graft.

When used as an intervertebral body fusion device the InFix System is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft at one or two contiguous levels in the lumbosacral region (L2-S1) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease (ODD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). DOD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at involved level may be treated with the device. Patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. When used as an intervertebral body fusion device, the InFix implant is intended to be used with supplemental fixation.

For both of the indications listed above, the InFix implant is intended to be implanted via an open anterior approach.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K132790: Infix Anterior Lumbar System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K132790

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026