510(k) · Cleared
ClearedEndoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Titan Spine, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on Apr 15, 2009 as substantially equivalent to P950002 (Zimmer Spine, Inc., 1996) and 6 other predicates after a 121-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 2001. 412 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Apr 15, 2009
- Review
- 121 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 7
Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K003275 (2001). 18 ancestors in all, the oldest K841189 (1984). 412 later devices descend from it, 6 citing it directly.
- Root · 5 generations backK003275 Synthes Synmesh Spacer SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2001 · Recalled
- 4 generations backK020152 Synthes Vertebral Spacer TISynthes (Usa) · 2002
- 3 generations backK024364 Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI (Curved and Narrow)Synthes (Usa) · 2003
- 2 generations backK032812 Endoskeleton TA Vertebral Body ReplacementOrthovita, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK080615 Endoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)Titan Spine, LLC · 2008
- This deviceK083714 Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)Titan Spine, LLC · 2009
- Descendant · cites it directly · 337 of its ownK102067 Endoskeleton toTitan Spine, LLC · 2010
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 267 of its ownK140055 Endoskeleton (R) TL Interbody Fusion DeviceTitan Spine, LLC · 2014
- Descendant · cites it directly · 265 of its ownK141953 Endoskeleton; TA Ibd and VBR, to and TT, Tas, TC, TLTitan Spine, LLC · 2014 · Recalled
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 236 of its ownK152475 FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2016
- Descendant · cites it directly · 235 of its ownK140348 Interbody CageEisertech, LLC · 2015
Showing 5 of 412 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 412 · See all- K102067Endoskeleton toTitan Spine, LLC · 2010 · cites it directly337descendants
- K140055Endoskeleton (R) TL Interbody Fusion DeviceTitan Spine, LLC · 2014 · 2 generations on267descendants
- K141953Endoskeleton; TA Ibd and VBR, to and TT, Tas, TC, TLTitan Spine, LLC · 2014 · cites it directly265descendants
- K152475FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2016 · 2 generations on236descendants
- K140348Interbody CageEisertech, LLC · 2015 · cites it directly235descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5 | K003275 | Synthes Synmesh Spacer System | Synthes (Usa) | 2001 | 14 |
| −4 | K020152 | Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI | Synthes (Usa) | 2002 | — |
| −3 | K024364 | Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI (Curved and Narrow) | Synthes (Usa) | 2003 | — |
| −2 | K032812 | Endoskeleton TA Vertebral Body Replacement | Orthovita, Inc. | 2003 | 1 |
| −1 | K080615 | Endoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd) | Titan Spine, LLC | 2008 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K083714 | Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd) | Titan Spine, LLC | 2009 | — |
| +1 | K102067 | Endoskeleton to | Titan Spine, LLC | 2010 | — |
| +2 | K140055 | Endoskeleton (R) TL Interbody Fusion Device | Titan Spine, LLC | 2014 | — |
| +1 | K141953 | Endoskeleton; TA Ibd and VBR, to and TT, Tas, TC, TL | Titan Spine, LLC | 2014 | 2 |
| +2 | K152475 | FORZA PTC Spacer System | Orthofix, Inc. | 2016 | — |
| +1 | K140348 | Interbody Cage | Eisertech, LLC | 2015 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 1 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 2 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2 | 0 |
| 2016 | 8 | 0 |
| 2017 | 9 | 0 |
| 2018 | 16 | 0 |
| 2019 | 19 | 0 |
| 2020 | 39 | 0 |
| 2021 | 38 | 0 |
| 2022 | 49 | 0 |
| 2023 | 55 | 0 |
| 2024 | 63 | 0 |
| 2025 | 60 | 0 |
| 2026 | 49 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (7)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | P950002 | Bak Interbody Fusion SystemSummary page 1…s the same indications for use, design, function, and materials used. - The four formerly Class HI predicate devices include the BAK Interbody Fusion Device (Spine-Tech, P950002), Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P970015), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surgical Dynamics, P950019) and the Br… | 1996 |
| * | P970015 | Inter Fix Threaded Fusion DeviceSummary page 1…ials used. - The four formerly Class HI predicate devices include the BAK Interbody Fusion Device (Spine-Tech, P950002), Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P970015), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surgical Dynamics, P950019) and the Brantigan Cage (P960025). In addition, other Class II product… | 1999 |
| * | P950019 | Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (TFC)(TM) with InstrumentationSummary page 1…nclude the BAK Interbody Fusion Device (Spine-Tech, P950002), Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P970015), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surgical Dynamics, P950019) and the Brantigan Cage (P960025). In addition, other Class II products including the Titan Spine Endoskeleton® TA IBD (K080615),… | 1996 |
| * | P960025 | Brantigen I/F Cage (R) Used with VSP (R) Spine Plates and Pedicle ScrewsSummary page 1…evice (Spine-Tech, P950002), Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P970015), the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surgical Dynamics, P950019) and the Brantigan Cage (P960025). In addition, other Class II products including the Titan Spine Endoskeleton® TA IBD (K080615), the Abbott Spine Infix Anterior… | 1999 |
| * | K080615 | Endoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)Summary page 1…Threaded Fusion Cage (Surgical Dynamics, P950019) and the Brantigan Cage (P960025). In addition, other Class II products including the Titan Spine Endoskeleton® TA IBD (K080615), the Abbott Spine Infix Anterior Lumbar Spacer (031672) and the Spinal Elements Lucent Interbody Device (K071724) provide featur… | 2008 |
| * | K031672 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. Infix SystemSummary page 1…e Brantigan Cage (P960025). In addition, other Class II products including the Titan Spine Endoskeleton® TA IBD (K080615), the Abbott Spine Infix Anterior Lumbar Spacer (031672) and the Spinal Elements Lucent Interbody Device (K071724) provide features that are substantially equivalent to the Titan Spine… | 2003 |
| * | K071724 | LucentSummary page 1…roducts including the Titan Spine Endoskeleton® TA IBD (K080615), the Abbott Spine Infix Anterior Lumbar Spacer (031672) and the Spinal Elements Lucent Interbody Device (K071724) provide features that are substantially equivalent to the Titan Spine Endoskeleton® TT IBD. Performance Testing: The pre-clinic… | 2007 |
What descends from it? (412)
See all 4126 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K102067 | Endoskeleton to | 2010 | 337 |
| K141953 | Endoskeleton; TA Ibd and VBR, to and TT, Tas, TC, TL | 2014 | 265 |
| K140348 | Interbody Cage | 2015 | 235 |
| K142589 | Endoskeleton TA IBD and VBR, Endoskeleton TO and TT, Endoskeleton TAS, Endoskeleton TAS… | 2014 | 106 |
| K163481 | HALF DOME Posterior Lumbar Interbody System | 2017 | 31 |
| K201145 | X-Pac Expandable Lumbar Cage System | 2020 | 4 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 11 months on median.
- 4 of the 18 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K102067 (Titan Spine, LLC, 2010) has gone furthest, with 337 descendants of its own.
- 34 other devices also cite its predicate P950002.
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Endoskeleton® TT IBD is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the devices. The device must be used with supplemental fixation. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). It is indicated to be used with autograft bone.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K083714 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K083714: Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K083714
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026