510(k) · Cleared
ClearedCervical Interbody Fusion System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Evolution Spine, LLC · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical
Cleared on May 5, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K090064 (Eminent Spine, 2009) after a 90-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1984. 2 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- May 5, 2016
- Review
- 90 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- ODP
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K841189 (1984). 32 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 8 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
- 7 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
- 6 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
- 5 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
- 4 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
- 3 generations backK033109 Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body ReplacementsScient'X · 2004
- 2 generations backK043479 MC+ Partial VBRLdr Spine USA · 2005
- 1 generation backK090064 Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion SystemEminent Spine · 2009 · Recalled
- This deviceK160324 Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemEvolution Spine, LLC · 2016
- Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK190618 RIGEL PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemMiRus, LLC · 2019
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK200685 RIGEL 3DR Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion SystemMiRus, LLC · 2020
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −8 | K841189 | Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator | Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. | 1984 | — |
| −7 | K990148 | Stackable Cage System | Depuy Motech Acromed | 1999 | — |
| −6 | K003043 | Surgical Titanium Mesh System | Depuyacromed | 2001 | — |
| −5 | K022793 | Tetris Spinal Implant | Signus Medical, LLC | 2003 | — |
| −4 | K031757 | Peek Tetris Spinal Implant | Signus Medical, LLC | 2003 | — |
| −3 | K033109 | Ellys and Aurys Vertebral Body Replacements | Scient'X | 2004 | — |
| −2 | K043479 | MC+ Partial VBR | Ldr Spine USA | 2005 | — |
| −1 | K090064 | Eminent Spine Interbody Fusion System | Eminent Spine | 2009 | 1 |
| 0 (this device) | K160324 | Cervical Interbody Fusion System | Evolution Spine, LLC | 2016 | — |
| +1 | K190618 | RIGEL PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System | MiRus, LLC | 2019 | — |
| +2 | K200685 | RIGEL 3DR Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System | MiRus, LLC | 2020 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 2 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 8 | 0 |
| 2002 | 4 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1 | 0 |
| 2004 | 3 | 0 |
| 2005 | 1 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device
- #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
What descends from it? (2)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K190618 | RIGEL PEEK Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion System | 2019 | 1 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 32 years and passes through 8 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.9 years on median.
- 6 of the 32 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K190618 (MiRus, LLC, 2019) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
- 33 other devices also cite its predicate K090064.
How does its category compare?
All ODP devicesODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · ODP
11in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · ODP
87in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · ODP
2in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · ODP
57in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8 | 89 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 12 | 127 | 1 | 21 |
| 2010 | 9 | 151 | 0 | 54 |
| 2011 | 25 | 113 | 1 | 38 |
| 2012 | 17 | 93 | 0 | 92 |
| 2013 | 18 | 187 | 1 | 78 |
| 2014 | 26 | 118 | 0 | 43 |
| 2015 | 24 | 180 | 0 | 51 |
| 2016 | 17 | 112 | 0 | 37 |
| 2017 | 33 | 104 | 0 | 39 |
| 2018 | 25 | 133 | 0 | 51 |
| 2019 | 22 | 92 | 0 | 141 |
| 2020 | 14 | 89 | 1 | 86 |
| 2021 | 18 | 121 | 0 | 161 |
| 2022 | 12 | 92 | 0 | 50 |
| 2023 | 34 | 165 | 0 | 36 |
| 2024 | 10 | 76 | 0 | 55 |
| 2025 | 11 | 87 | 2 | 57 |
| 2026 | 19 | 117 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
This system is indicated for intervertebral fusion in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine at one disc level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with the autograft to facilitate fusion. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K160324 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K160324: Cervical Interbody Fusion System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K160324
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026