510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Hubble II

K163180510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 29, 201645-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Orbbo Surgical, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Dec 29, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K152355 (Spineway, 2015) after a 45-day review. Its family tree reaches back 14 generations to 1984. 1 of the 65 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall.

Decided
Dec 29, 2016
Review
45 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 14 generations to K841189 (1984). 64 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 1 of the 65 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by generation 2 generations back: 4 other ancestors3 generations back: 13 other ancestors, 1 with a Class I recall14 generations back: 9 other ancestors5 generations back: 6 other ancestors6 generations back: 6 other ancestors7 generations back: 3 other ancestors8 generations back: 3 other ancestors9 generations back: 3 other ancestors10 generations back: 2 other ancestors11 generations back: 1 other ancestor K152355 · Twin Peaks Lumbar Interbody Fusion System · Spineway · 2015K133216 · Crescent Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2013K110543 · Crescent (R) Spinal System Titanium · Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2011K094025 · Crescent Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2010K073291 · Capstone Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008K072120 · Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion Device · Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007K062759 · Paramount VBR System · Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007K042930 · Spacevision Cage System · Spine Vision, Inc. · 2004K041888 · Curved Peek Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004K031757 · Peek Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medical, LLC · 2003K022793 · Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medical, LLC · 2003K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984−10−50
  1. Root · 14 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 10 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK110543 Crescent (R) Spinal System TitaniumMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2011
  4. 2 generations backK133216 Crescent Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2013
  5. 1 generation backK152355 Twin Peaks Lumbar Interbody Fusion SystemSpineway · 2015
  6. This deviceK163180 Hubble IIOrbbo Surgical, LLC · 2016
Show all 14 generations
  1. Root · 14 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 13 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 12 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 11 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 10 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 9 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 8 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 7 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  9. 6 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  10. 5 generations backK073291 Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2008
  11. 4 generations backK094025 Crescent Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2010
  12. 3 generations backK110543 Crescent (R) Spinal System TitaniumMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2011
  13. 2 generations backK133216 Crescent Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2013
  14. 1 generation backK152355 Twin Peaks Lumbar Interbody Fusion SystemSpineway · 2015
  15. This deviceK163180 Hubble IIOrbbo Surgical, LLC · 2016

Class I recalls in this family

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−14K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−13K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−12K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−11K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−10K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−9K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−8K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−7K062759Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−6K072120Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−5K073291Capstone Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2008—
−4K094025Crescent Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2010—
−3K110543Crescent (R) Spinal System TitaniumMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2011—
−2K133216Crescent Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.2013—
−1K152355Twin Peaks Lumbar Interbody Fusion SystemSpineway2015—
0 (this device)K163180Hubble IIOrbbo Surgical, LLC2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199920
200010
200180
200280
200360
200460
200530
200730
200871
200920
201020
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K163180, 1984–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K152355Twin Peaks Lumbar Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 5
…ral support mechanism (identical) Table 5-1 Predicate Devices 510k Trade or Proprietary or Model Manufacturer Type Number Name K152355 Twin Peaks Spineway Primary PERFORMANCE TESTING The Hubble II Lumbar Inte…
Spineway2015—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · 3 generations back · ◆ in the 2008 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 32 years and passes through 12 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • 6 of the 64 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The Hubble II Lumbar Interbody Fusion System is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. Degenerative disc disease is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the…

Read the full statement (116 words)

The Hubble II Lumbar Interbody Fusion System is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. Degenerative disc disease is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). Hubble II System implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft. Patients should be skeletally mature and have at least six months of non-operative treatment. The Hubble II System must be used with supplemental fixation cleared by FDA for use in the lumbar spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K163180: Hubble II.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K163180

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026