510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Comprehensive Humeral Fracture Positioning Sleeves

K212435510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 10, 2021128-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3660

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Biomet, Inc. · KWS Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented

Cleared on Dec 10, 2021 as substantially equivalent to K193038 (Biomet Manufacturing Corp, 2020) and 1 other predicate after a 128-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1980.

Decided
Dec 10, 2021
Review
128 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KWS
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K800494 (1980). 28 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2004: 1 other ancestor2003: 1 other ancestor2002: 1 other ancestor1999: 3 other ancestors1997: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor2001: 1 other ancestor1998: 2 other ancestors1995: 2 other ancestors1994: 1 other ancestor1992: 2 other ancestors1991: 1 other ancestor1988: 1 other ancestor1987: 3 other ancestors1980: 1 other ancestorReference device: K193546 · Distal Centralizers · Biomet, Inc. · 2020K800494 · New Jersey Hemiarthroplasty Sholder Pros · Depuy, Inc. · 1980K991585 · Bipolar Shoulder Prosthesis · Biomet, Inc. · 1999K002998 · Biomet BI-Polar Shoulder System · Biomet, Inc. · 2000 · recalledK030710 · Bio-Modular Shoulder System · Biomet, Inc. · 2003 · recalledK060692 · Comprehensive Primary Shoulder Stems · Biomet Manufacturing Corp · 2006 · recalledK193038 · Comprehensive Shoulder System · Biomet Manufacturing Corp · 2020 · recalled19801990200020102020
  1. Root · 6 generations backK800494 New Jersey Hemiarthroplasty Sholder ProsDepuy, Inc. · 1980
  2. 5 generations backK991585 Bipolar Shoulder ProsthesisBiomet, Inc. · 1999
  3. 4 generations backK002998 Biomet BI-Polar Shoulder SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2000 · Recalled
  4. 3 generations backK030710 Bio-Modular Shoulder SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  5. 2 generations backK060692 Comprehensive Primary Shoulder StemsBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2006 · Recalled
  6. 1 generation backK193038 Comprehensive Shoulder SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2020 · Recalled
  7. This deviceK212435 Comprehensive Humeral Fracture Positioning SleevesBiomet, Inc. · 2021
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K800494New Jersey Hemiarthroplasty Sholder ProsDepuy, Inc.1980—
−5K991585Bipolar Shoulder ProsthesisBiomet, Inc.1999—
−4K002998Biomet BI-Polar Shoulder SystemBiomet, Inc.20001
−3K030710Bio-Modular Shoulder SystemBiomet, Inc.20031
−2K060692Comprehensive Primary Shoulder StemsBiomet Manufacturing Corp20066
−1K193038Comprehensive Shoulder SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp20201
0 (this device)K212435Comprehensive Humeral Fracture Positioning SleevesBiomet, Inc.2021—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198010
198730
198810
199110
199220
199410
199520
199610
199710
199820
199930
200110
200210
200310
200410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K212435, 1980–2021Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KWS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KWS device

  1. #1 K220847 AETOS Shoulder Systemscore 21.1 · 16 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K193038Comprehensive Shoulder System
Summary page 4
…constrained cemented prosthesis. (21CFR888.3650) Predicate Device(s): K193038 Comprehensive Biomet, INC. Shoulder System…
Biomet Manufacturing Corp20201
*K033506Comprehensive Humeral Fracture Positioning Sleeve
Summary page 4
…K193038 Comprehensive Biomet, INC. Shoulder System K033506 Comprehensive Biomet, INC. Humeral Fracture…
Biomet, Inc.2004—
†K193546Distal CentralizersBiomet, Inc.2020—

Also cleared against K193038: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 41 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.0 years on median.
  • 6 of the 28 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K193038.

How does its category compare?

All KWS devices

KWS Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · KWS

3in 2025

2007: 22008: 42009: 42010: 72011: 112012: 72013: 122014: 72015: 82016: 102017: 72018: 42019: 92020: 32021: 52022: 52023: 42024: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 12 (2013) · low 2 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KWS

97in 2025

2008: 37 days median2009: 108 days median2010: 33 days median2011: 90 days median2012: 86 days median2013: 120 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 129 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 120 days median2018: 152 days median2019: 106 days median2020: 98 days median2021: 151 days median2022: 158 days median2023: 250 days median2025: 97 days median
2007high 250 (2023) · low 33 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KWS

2in 2023

2007: 212008: 292010: 102011: 112012: 102014: 12016: 12017: 42018: 12019: 22020: 52023: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 29 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KWS

2,281in 2025

2007: 1582008: 2382009: 2942010: 3932011: 4862012: 5422013: 8182014: 1,0662015: 1,1702016: 9702017: 1,6812018: 1,5452019: 1,7282020: 1,5672021: 1,3582022: 1,2682023: 1,7502024: 2,1222025: 2,281
2007high 2,281 (2025) · low 158 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KWS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—21158
200843729238
200941080294
201073310393
2011119011486
201278610542
2013121200818
201478911,066
2015812901,170
2016101141970
2017712041,681
2018415211,545
2019910621,728
202039851,567
2021515101,358
2022515801,268
2023425021,750
20242—02,122
202539702,281
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

INDICATIONS 1. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis. 2. Rheumatoid arthritis. 3. Correction of functional defonnity. 4. Fractures of the proximal humerus, where other methods of treatment are deemed inadequate. 5. Difficult clinical management problems, including cuffarthropathy, where other methods oftreatment may not be suitable or may be inadequate. Optional use in revision: in some medical…

Read the full statement (244 words)

INDICATIONS

1. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis.

2. Rheumatoid arthritis.

3. Correction of functional defonnity.

4. Fractures of the proximal humerus, where other methods of treatment are deemed inadequate.

5. Difficult clinical management problems, including cuffarthropathy, where other methods oftreatment may not be suitable or may be inadequate.

Optional use in revision: in some medical conditions (e.g. revision when healthy and good bone stock exists), the surgeon may opt to use primary implants in a revision procedure.

Humeral components with a MacroBond® Surface Coating are indicated for either cemented or uncemented press-fit applications.

Humeral components with a porous coated surface coating are indicated for either cemented or uncemented biological fixation applications.

The Comprehensive® Modular Hybrid® Glenoid is intended to be implanted with bone cement. The optional porous titanium peg may be inserted without bone cement. The optional polyethylene peg should be inserted with bone cement.

The Comprehensive Humeral Positioning Sleeves are for cemented use only and are intended for use with the Comprehensive Fracture Stem.

The Versa-Dial Humeral Head Prosthesis is intended for use only with the Comprehensive Shoulder Stems (Fracture, Primary and Revision), and the glenoid components of the Comprehensive Shoulder System.

The Titanium Versa-Dial Humeral Head Prosthesis is indicated for patients with suspected cobalt alloy sensitivity. The wear properties of Titanium and Titanium alloys are inferior to that of cobalt alloy. A Titanium humeral head is not recommended for patients who lack suspected material sensitivity to cobalt alloy.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K212435: Comprehensive Humeral Fracture Positioning Sleeves.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K212435

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026