510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Identity Revision Humeral Stems

K251098510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 11, 2025123-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3670

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zimmer, Inc. · MBF Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Uncemented

Cleared on Aug 11, 2025 as substantially equivalent to K213856 (Zimmer, Inc., 2022) and 1 other predicate after a 123-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1980.

Decided
Aug 11, 2025
Review
123 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MBF
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K800494 (1980). 27 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2002: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor2001: 1 other ancestor1999: 3 other ancestors1998: 2 other ancestors1996: 1 other ancestor1995: 2 other ancestors1994: 1 other ancestor1992: 2 other ancestors1988: 1 other ancestor1987: 3 other ancestors1991: 1 other ancestor1980: 1 other ancestorK800494 · New Jersey Hemiarthroplasty Sholder Pros · Depuy, Inc. · 1980K991585 · Bipolar Shoulder Prosthesis · Biomet, Inc. · 1999K002998 · Biomet BI-Polar Shoulder System · Biomet, Inc. · 2000 · recalledK030710 · Bio-Modular Shoulder System · Biomet, Inc. · 2003 · recalledK060692 · Comprehensive Primary Shoulder Stems · Biomet Manufacturing Corp · 2006 · recalledK193038 · Comprehensive Shoulder System · Biomet Manufacturing Corp · 2020 · recalledK213856 · Identity Shoulder System · Zimmer, Inc. · 202219801990200020102020
  1. Root · 7 generations backK800494 New Jersey Hemiarthroplasty Sholder ProsDepuy, Inc. · 1980
  2. 6 generations backK991585 Bipolar Shoulder ProsthesisBiomet, Inc. · 1999
  3. 5 generations backK002998 Biomet BI-Polar Shoulder SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2000 · Recalled
  4. 4 generations backK030710 Bio-Modular Shoulder SystemBiomet, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  5. 3 generations backK060692 Comprehensive Primary Shoulder StemsBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2006 · Recalled
  6. 2 generations backK193038 Comprehensive Shoulder SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp · 2020 · Recalled
  7. 1 generation backK213856 Identity Shoulder SystemZimmer, Inc. · 2022
  8. This deviceK251098 Identity Revision Humeral StemsZimmer, Inc. · 2025
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K800494New Jersey Hemiarthroplasty Sholder ProsDepuy, Inc.1980—
−6K991585Bipolar Shoulder ProsthesisBiomet, Inc.1999—
−5K002998Biomet BI-Polar Shoulder SystemBiomet, Inc.20001
−4K030710Bio-Modular Shoulder SystemBiomet, Inc.20031
−3K060692Comprehensive Primary Shoulder StemsBiomet Manufacturing Corp20066
−2K193038Comprehensive Shoulder SystemBiomet Manufacturing Corp20201
−1K213856Identity Shoulder SystemZimmer, Inc.2022—
0 (this device)K251098Identity Revision Humeral StemsZimmer, Inc.2025—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198010
198730
198810
199110
199220
199410
199520
199610
199710
199820
199930
200110
200210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K251098, 1980–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MBF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MBF device

  1. #1 K202716 Ignite Anatomic Shoulder Systemscore 20.3 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K213856Identity Shoulder System
Summary page 5
…de(s) MBF, KWT, KWS, HSD, PHX I Legally Marketed Predicate Devices 21 CFR 807.92(a)(3) Predicate # Predicate Trade Name (Primary Predicate is listed first) Product Code K213856 Identity Shoulder System MBF, KWT, K K193038 Comprehensive Shoulder System MBF, KWT, i§ Device Description Summary 21 CFR 807.92(…
Zimmer, Inc.2022—
*K193038Comprehensive Shoulder System
Summary page 5
…eted Predicate Devices 21 CFR 807.92(a)(3) Predicate # Predicate Trade Name (Primary Predicate is listed first) Product Code K213856 Identity Shoulder System MBF, KWT, K K193038 Comprehensive Shoulder System MBF, KWT, i§ Device Description Summary 21 CFR 807.92(a)(4) The Identity Revision Humeral Stems ar…
Biomet Manufacturing Corp20201

Also cleared against K213856: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 45 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.9 years on median.
  • 6 of the 27 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K213856.

How does its category compare?

All MBF devices

MBF Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MBF

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 12009: 12012: 22013: 12014: 12017: 22018: 12019: 22020: 22021: 12022: 42023: 42024: 22025: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 4 (2022) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MBF

144in 2023

2022: 164 days median2023: 144 days median
2007high 164 (2022) · low 144 (2023)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MBF

1in 2023

2009: 12017: 12018: 12019: 22022: 82023: 1
2007high 8 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MBF

255in 2025

2007: 22008: 72009: 162010: 242011: 322012: 302013: 402014: 282015: 492016: 852017: 1932018: 992019: 472020: 242021: 362022: 1142023: 1432024: 1642025: 255
2007high 255 (2025) · low 2 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MBF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—02
20081—07
20091—116
20100—024
20110—032
20122—030
20131—040
20141—028
20150—049
20160—085
20172—1193
20181—199
20192—247
20202—024
20211—036
202241648114
202341441143
20242—0164
20252—0255
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

Hemiarthoplasty/Conventional Total Application: * Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis. * Rheumatoid arthritis. * Correction of functional deformity. * Fractures of the proximal humerus, where other methods of treatment are deemed inadequate. * Difficult clinical management problems, including cuff arthropathy, where other methods of treatment may not be suitable or may be inadequate. Optional use in…

Read the full statement (208 words)

Hemiarthoplasty/Conventional Total Application:

* Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis.

* Rheumatoid arthritis.

* Correction of functional deformity.

* Fractures of the proximal humerus, where other methods of treatment are deemed inadequate.

* Difficult clinical management problems, including cuff arthropathy, where other methods of treatment may not be suitable or may be inadequate.

Optional use in revision: in some medical conditions (e.g. revision when healthy and good bone stock exists), the surgeon may opt to use primary implants in a revision procedure.

Reverse Application:

Identity Revision Humeral Stem products are indicated for use in patients whose shoulder joint has a grossly deficient rotator cuff with severe arthropathy and/or previously failed shoulder joint replacement with a grossly deficient rotator cuff. The patient must be anatomically and structurally suited to receive the implants and a functional deltoid muscle is necessary.

The Identity Revision Humeral Stem is indicated for primary, fracture, or revision total shoulder replacement for the relief of pain and significant disability due to gross rotator cuff deficiency.

The assembled humeral component may be used alone for hemiarthroplasty or combined with the glenoid component or reverse components for total shoulder arthroplasty (conventional or reverse applications). The humeral components may be used cemented or uncemented (biological fixation).

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K251098: Identity Revision Humeral Stems.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K251098

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026