510(k) · Cleared
Cleared“BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 Cage
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Biogend Therapeutics Co., Ltd. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on Mar 6, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K180228 (Paonan Biotech Co., Ltd., 2019) after a 162-day review. Its family tree reaches back 12 generations to 1984. 1 of the 42 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall.
- Decided
- Mar 6, 2024
- Review
- 162 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 12 generations to K841189 (1984). 41 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 1 of the 42 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.
- Root · 12 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
- 8 generations between
- 3 generations backK073177 Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemPioneer Surgical Technology · 2008 · Recalled
- 2 generations backK103111 Forza Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2011 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK180228 II-Type Intervertebral SpacerPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd. · 2019
- This deviceK233075 “BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 CageBiogend Therapeutics Co., Ltd. · 2024
Show all 12 generations
- Root · 12 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
- 11 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
- 10 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
- 9 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
- 8 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
- 7 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
- 6 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
- 5 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
- 4 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
- 3 generations backK073177 Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemPioneer Surgical Technology · 2008 · Recalled
- 2 generations backK103111 Forza Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2011 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK180228 II-Type Intervertebral SpacerPaonan Biotech Co., Ltd. · 2019
- This deviceK233075 “BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 CageBiogend Therapeutics Co., Ltd. · 2024
Class I recalls in this family
- K073202 Ardis Spacer3 generations back · 2008
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −12 | K841189 | Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator | Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. | 1984 | — |
| −11 | K990148 | Stackable Cage System | Depuy Motech Acromed | 1999 | — |
| −10 | K003043 | Surgical Titanium Mesh System | Depuyacromed | 2001 | — |
| −9 | K022793 | Tetris Spinal Implant | Signus Medical, LLC | 2003 | — |
| −8 | K031757 | Peek Tetris Spinal Implant | Signus Medical, LLC | 2003 | — |
| −7 | K041888 | Curved Peek Tetris Spinal Implant | Signus Medizintechnik GmbH | 2004 | — |
| −6 | K042930 | Spacevision Cage System | Spine Vision, Inc. | 2004 | — |
| −5 | K062759 | Paramount VBR System | Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. | 2007 | — |
| −4 | K072120 | Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion Device | Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. | 2007 | — |
| −3 | K073177 | Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device System | Pioneer Surgical Technology | 2008 | 1 |
| −2 | K103111 | Forza Spacer System | Orthofix, Inc. | 2011 | 1 |
| −1 | K180228 | II-Type Intervertebral Spacer | Paonan Biotech Co., Ltd. | 2019 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K233075 | “BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 Cage | Biogend Therapeutics Co., Ltd. | 2024 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 2 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 4 | 0 |
| 2002 | 4 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2 | 0 |
| 2004 | 4 | 0 |
| 2005 | 1 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3 | 1 |
| 2009 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K180228 | II-Type Intervertebral SpacerSummary page 4…duct Code: MAX Regulation number: 888.3080 Device Class: Ⅱ 510(k) Number: K180228 K233075… | 2019 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
Relatives with a Class I recall
Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.
- K073202Ardis SpacerAbbott Spine, Inc. · 2008 · 3 generations back · ◆ in the 2008 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 40 years and passes through 11 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.9 years on median.
- 9 of the 41 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The “BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. This device is to be used with autograft bone and/or allograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic…
Read the full statement (141 words)
The “BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. This device is to be used with autograft bone and/or allograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). Patients should have at least six months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage. “BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 Cage is to be implanted via a direct posterior approach. These devices are intended to be used with supplemental fixation instrumentation, which has been cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K233075 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K233075: “BioGend” Interbody Fusion System 001 Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K233075
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026