510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2006

Vigilance Continuous Cardiac Output/Oximetry (Cco/SVO2) Monitor

K955816510(k) TraditionalCleared May 6, 1997497-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1240Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Baxter Healthcare Corp · DYG Catheter, Flow Directed

Cleared on May 6, 1997 as substantially equivalent to K924452 (Baxter Healthcare Corp, 1993) and 1 other predicate after a 497-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1993. It has been recalled once.

Decided
May 6, 1997
Review
497 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DYG
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K924452 (1993). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1994: 1 other ancestorK924452 · Swan-Ganz Cco/SVO2 Thermodilution Catheter · Baxter Healthcare Corp · 1993 · recalled19901992199419961998
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K924452 · Swan-Ganz Cco/SVO2 Thermodilution Catheter · Baxter Healthcare Corp · 1993 · recalled0
  1. Root · 1 generation backK924452 Swan-Ganz Cco/SVO2 Thermodilution CatheterBaxter Healthcare Corp · 1993 · Recalled
  2. This deviceK955816 Vigilance Continuous Cardiac Output/Oximetry (Cco/SVO2) MonitorBaxter Healthcare Corp · 1997
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K924452Swan-Ganz Cco/SVO2 Thermodilution CatheterBaxter Healthcare Corp19932
0 (this device)K955816Vigilance Continuous Cardiac Output/Oximetry (Cco/SVO2) MonitorBaxter Healthcare Corp1997—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K955816, 1993–1997Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DYG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DYG device

  1. #1 K242451 HemoSphere Alta Advanced Monitoring Platform…score 24.2 · 39 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K924452Swan-Ganz Cco/SVO2 Thermodilution Catheter
Summary page 1
…dentification The Vigilance CCO/SvO2 Monitor is substantially equivalent to the Vigilance CCO/SvO2 Monitor which was cleared for marketing under premarket notifications K924452 and K940795. Compliance with 513/514 No performance standards have been established under Section 514 of the Food, Drug and Cos…
Baxter Healthcare Corp19932
*K940795Swan-Ganz CC0/SVO2 Thermodilution Catheter
Summary page 1
…n The Vigilance CCO/SvO2 Monitor is substantially equivalent to the Vigilance CCO/SvO2 Monitor which was cleared for marketing under premarket notifications K924452 and K940795. Compliance with 513/514 No performance standards have been established under Section 514 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.…
Baxter Edwards19942

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jun 21, 2006Not classifiedZ-1310-06OtherEdwards Lifesciences Vigilance monitors with software release 5.3 or earlier may improperly cause the monitor to deliver power to the Continuous Cardiac Output (CCO) catheter without alerting the user to this situation. This can result in…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • 2 of the 2 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All DYG devices

DYG Catheter, Flow Directed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DYG

3in 2024

2008: 12011: 12016: 12020: 12022: 12023: 12024: 3
2007high 3 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DYG

188in 2024

2024: 188 days median
2007high 188 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DYG

2in 2019

2007: 12009: 32013: 12018: 4, 4 Class I2019: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 4 (2018) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (4 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DYG

268in 2025

2007: 1682008: 4002009: 1452010: 1472011: 2492012: 2212013: 1492014: 1782015: 1632016: 1542017: 1152018: 1332019: 1442020: 1042021: 972022: 1302023: 2292024: 2262025: 268
2007high 400 (2008) · low 97 (2021)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DYG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—1168
20081—0400
20090—3145
20100—0147
20111—0249
20120—0221
20130—1149
20140—0178
20150—0163
20161—0154
20170—0115
20180—4 (4)133
20190—2144
20201—0104
20210—097
20221—0130
20231—0229
202431880226
20250—0268
20260—2—

What is it indicated for?

The Vigilance CCO/SvO2 Monitor is intended to measure both bolus/injectate and continuous cardiac output in addition to mixed venous oxygen saturation. The system also calculates hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K955816: Vigilance Continuous Cardiac Output/Oximetry (Cco/SVO2) Monitor.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K955816

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026