510(k) · Cleared
ClearedContrast Control Device
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Medex, Inc. · FPA Set, Administration, Intravascular
Cleared on Jul 21, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K883318 (Valleylab, Inc., 1988) and 1 other predicate after a 35-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1988.
- Decided
- Jul 21, 1998
- Review
- 35 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- FPA
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K883318 (1988). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK883318 Valleylab I.V. Administration SetsValleylab, Inc. · 1988
- This deviceK982123 Contrast Control DeviceMedex, Inc. · 1998
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K883318 | Valleylab I.V. Administration Sets | Valleylab, Inc. | 1988 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K982123 | Contrast Control Device | Medex, Inc. | 1998 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in FPA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new FPA device
- #1 K243841 Sparta Infusion Set for Insulinscore 13.4 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K883318 | Valleylab I.V. Administration SetsSummary page 1…Control Device, for purposes as defined under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, are substantially equivalent to the Medex IV Administration Set, K883318 and pre-amendment (primary predicate). Additionally, the Contrast Control Device is substantially equivalent to the Namic Contras… | 1988 |
| * | K903493 | Namic Contrast Savings Delivery SystemSummary page 1…istration Set, K883318 and pre-amendment (primary predicate). Additionally, the Contrast Control Device is substantially equivalent to the Namic Contrast Savings System, K903493 (secondary predicate). 807.92(a)(4) Description of the Premarket Notification Device and 807.92 (a) (5) Intended Use The CCD is… | 1991 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
How does its category compare?
All FPA devicesFPA Set, Administration, Intravascular: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · FPA
11in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · FPA
225in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · FPA
98in 2025
Class I (17 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · FPA
34,506in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code FPA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 16 | 75 | 17 | 1,499 |
| 2008 | 18 | 89 | 15 | 1,941 |
| 2009 | 10 | 166 | 166 | 2,512 |
| 2010 | 23 | 120 | 58 | 2,537 |
| 2011 | 12 | 87 | 28 | 4,407 |
| 2012 | 21 | 96 | 16 (4) | 4,930 |
| 2013 | 13 | 90 | 64 | 4,651 |
| 2014 | 22 | 89 | 24 | 4,695 |
| 2015 | 17 | 123 | 6 | 6,625 |
| 2016 | 12 | 195 | 10 | 8,470 |
| 2017 | 17 | 240 | 13 | 6,462 |
| 2018 | 4 | 177 | 4 | 6,574 |
| 2019 | 7 | 161 | 13 | 11,227 |
| 2020 | 10 | 327 | 107 | 9,563 |
| 2021 | 13 | 186 | 1 | 10,414 |
| 2022 | 14 | 213 | 9 (5) | 13,393 |
| 2023 | 14 | 340 | 12 (4) | 10,916 |
| 2024 | 7 | 244 | 13 (1) | 47,210 |
| 2025 | 11 | 225 | 98 (1) | 34,506 |
| 2026 | 5 | 266 | 10 (2) | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Contrast Control Device (CCD) is intended for use in the IV delivery of contrast media during imaging procedures with a secondary intended use of conservation of contrast media.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K982123 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K982123: Contrast Control Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982123
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026