510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class I · 2009

Skull Base Instatrak System

K982994510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 16, 199881-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050Recalls 1 (1 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Visualization Technology, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Nov 16, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K960330 (Visualization Technology, Inc., 1996) and 2 other predicates after an 81-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1994. 6 of the 284 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 280 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once, including a Class I recall.

Decided
Nov 16, 1998
Review
81 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
1 (1 Class I)
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K911783 (1994). 3 ancestors in all. 280 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly. 6 of the 284 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1996: 1 other ancestor, 1 with a Class I recall12006: 1 descendant cleared1999: 1 descendant cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12008: 1 descendant cleared2014: 8 descendants cleared2009: 2 descendants cleared2012: 3 descendants cleared2015: 16 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2013: 4 descendants cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2016: 16 descendants cleared2018: 19 descendants cleared2017: 30 descendants cleared2021: 24 descendants cleared2020: 27 descendants cleared2019: 16 descendants cleared2026: 22 descendants cleared2023: 18 descendants cleared2025: 28 descendants cleared, 2 with a Class I recall22022: 23 descendants cleared2024: 19 descendants clearedK911783 · Allegro Viewing Wand · I.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · 1994K981998 · Pediatric Instatrak System · Visualization Technology, Inc. · 1998 · Class I recall1990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor, 1 with a Class I recall1 1 generation forward: 2 descendants, 1 with a Class I recall12 generations forward: 7 descendants3 generations forward: 12 descendants4 generations forward: 20 descendants5 generations forward: 35 descendants6 generations forward: 34 descendants7 generations forward: 41 descendants8 generations forward: 38 descendants, 2 with a Class I recall29 generations forward: 37 descendants10 generations forward: 25 descendants11 generations forward: 18 descendants12 generations forward: 9 descendants13 generations forward: 2 descendants K981998 · Pediatric Instatrak System · Visualization Technology, Inc. · 1998 · Class I recallK911783 · Allegro Viewing Wand · I.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · 19940+5+10
  1. Root · 2 generations backK911783 Allegro Viewing WandI.S.G. Technologies, Inc. · 1994
  2. 1 generation backK981998 Pediatric Instatrak SystemVisualization Technology, Inc. · 1998 · Recalled (Class I)
  3. This deviceK982994 Skull Base Instatrak SystemVisualization Technology, Inc. · 1998
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 278 of its ownK053610 AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 222 of its ownK121498 PercunavPhilips Health Care · 2012
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 211 of its ownK132304 Epiq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2013 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · 4 generations on · 100 of its ownK160807 EPIQ 5 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, EPIQ 7Diagnostic Ultrasound…Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2016 · Recalled
  8. Descendant · 4 generations on · 87 of its ownK133833 Nuvis Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2014 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 280 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1999: 12006: 12008: 12009: 22010: 12011: 12012: 32013: 42014: 82015: 162016: 162017: 302018: 192019: 162020: 272021: 242022: 232023: 182024: 192025: 282026: 22
1999high 30 (2017) · low 0 (2000)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 280 · See all
  • K053610AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc. · 2006 · cites it directly278descendants
  • K121498PercunavPhilips Health Care · 2012 · 2 generations on222descendants
  • K132304Epiq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2013 · 3 generations on211descendants
  • K160807EPIQ 5 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, EPIQ 7Diagnostic Ultrasound System, Affiniti 50…Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2016 · 4 generations on100descendants
  • K133833Nuvis Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2014 · 4 generations on87descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K911783Allegro Viewing WandI.S.G. Technologies, Inc.1994—
−1K981998Pediatric Instatrak SystemVisualization Technology, Inc.1998Class I
0 (this device)K982994Skull Base Instatrak SystemVisualization Technology, Inc.1998—
+1K053610AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc.20063
+2K121498PercunavPhilips Health Care2012—
+3K132304Epiq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.201336
+4K160807EPIQ 5 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, EPIQ 7Diagnostic Ultrasound System…Philips Ultrasound, Inc.201633
+4K133833Nuvis Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.20143

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199611

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199911
200610
200810
200920
201010
201110
201230
201340
201480
2015160
2016160
2017300
2018190
2019160
2020270
2021240
2022230
2023180
2024190
2025282
2026220
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982994, 1994–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

6 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960330Instatrak
Summary page 1
…e: Computed Tomography X-Ray System 3. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PREDICATE OR LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICE(S) TO WHICH EQUIVALENCE Is BEING CLAIMED InstaTrak System, subject of K960330, the Pediatric InstaTrak System, subject of K981998 and the Viewing Wand manufactured by ISG Technologies, Inc., subject of K9117…
Visualization Technology, Inc.1996Class I
*K981998Pediatric Instatrak System
Summary page 1
…ON OF THE PREDICATE OR LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICE(S) TO WHICH EQUIVALENCE Is BEING CLAIMED InstaTrak System, subject of K960330, the Pediatric InstaTrak System, subject of K981998 and the Viewing Wand manufactured by ISG Technologies, Inc., subject of K911783. Visualization Technology, Inc. 510(k) 8/26/98 S…
Visualization Technology, Inc.1998Class I
*K911783Allegro Viewing Wand
Summary page 1
…CLAIMED InstaTrak System, subject of K960330, the Pediatric InstaTrak System, subject of K981998 and the Viewing Wand manufactured by ISG Technologies, Inc., subject of K911783. Visualization Technology, Inc. 510(k) 8/26/98 Skull Base InstaTrak System Page E-1 4. DEVICE DESCRIPTION The I…
I.S.G. Technologies, Inc.1994—

Also cleared against K960330: 7 other devices →

What descends from it? (280)

See all 280

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K053610AbarisTraxtal Technologies, Inc.2006278
K990919Straight Aspirator, 90 Degree Aspirator,45 Degree Aspirator,7 French Aspirator,Extended… Class IVisualization Technology, Inc.19990

Has anything in its family been recalled? (6 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jun 22, 2009Class IZ-2251-2012Labeling False and MisleadingGE Healthcare Surgery had discovered that using the Inverted Headset Placement is not a validated configuration with the IT 3000, 2500, 2500 plus, 3500, 3500 plus, ConneCTstat, and ConneCTstat Plus Surgical Navigation equipment.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K981998Pediatric Instatrak SystemVisualization Technology, Inc. · 1998 · Direct predicate · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K960330InstatrakVisualization Technology, Inc. · 1996 · Direct predicate · ◆ in the 1996 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K990919Straight Aspirator, 90 Degree Aspirator,45 Degree Aspirator,7 French Aspirator,Extended Straight…Visualization Technology, Inc. · 1999 · Cites it directly · ◆ in the 1999 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K242670Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound · 2025 · 8 generations on · ◆ in the 2025 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K242519Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound · 2025 · 8 generations on · ◆ in the 2025 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 4 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.4 years on median.
  • 2 of the 3 ancestors have a recall of any class; 2 have a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K053610 (Traxtal Technologies, Inc., 2006) has gone furthest, with 278 descendants of its own.
  • 7 other devices also cite its predicate K960330.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

The Skull Based InstaTrak System is intended for image guided assistance during skull base surgical procedures. It is intended to be used during skull base surgery involving procedures on the base of the brain (junction of the face and neurocranium).

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982994: Skull Base Instatrak System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982994

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026