510(k) · Cleared
ClearedPain Care 3200
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Breg, Inc. · MEB Pump, Infusion, Elastomeric
Cleared on Dec 3, 2001 after a 5-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 of the 19 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 18 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Dec 3, 2001
- Review
- 5 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MEB
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
18 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly. 1 of the 19 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.
- This deviceK013928 Pain Care 3200Breg, Inc. · 2001
- Descendant · cites it directly · 17 of its ownK023098 Accufuser, Accufuser Plus, Standard Procedure Kit, Accufuser…Mckinley Infuser · 2002
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 15 of its ownK033039 Modification to: Accufuser, Accufuser Plus, Standard Procedure KitsMckinley, Inc. · 2003
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 8 of its ownK032642 Beeline SystemMckinley, Inc. · 2003
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 7 of its ownK042228 Beeline Motiv, Propolis, PcaMckinley, Inc. · 2004
- Descendant · 4 generations on · 6 of its ownK050770 Modification to Accufuser, Accufuser Plus Standard Procedure KitMckinley Medical, LLC · 2005
Showing 5 of 18 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Class I recalls in this family
- K081905 Accuflow and Accuflux Elastomeric Infusion Pump5 generations on · 2008
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 18 · See all- K023098Accufuser, Accufuser Plus, Standard Procedure Kit, Accufuser Infusion KitMckinley Infuser · 2002 · cites it directly17descendants
- K033039Modification to: Accufuser, Accufuser Plus, Standard Procedure KitsMckinley, Inc. · 2003 · 2 generations on15descendants
- K032642Beeline SystemMckinley, Inc. · 2003 · 2 generations on8descendants
- K042228Beeline Motiv, Propolis, PcaMckinley, Inc. · 2004 · 3 generations on7descendants
- K050770Modification to Accufuser, Accufuser Plus Standard Procedure KitMckinley Medical, LLC · 2005 · 4 generations on6descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | K013928 | Pain Care 3200 | Breg, Inc. | 2001 | — |
| +1 | K023098 | Accufuser, Accufuser Plus, Standard Procedure Kit, Accufuser Infusion Kit | Mckinley Infuser | 2002 | — |
| +2 | K033039 | Modification to: Accufuser, Accufuser Plus, Standard Procedure Kits | Mckinley, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| +2 | K032642 | Beeline System | Mckinley, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| +3 | K042228 | Beeline Motiv, Propolis, Pca | Mckinley, Inc. | 2004 | — |
| +4 | K050770 | Modification to Accufuser, Accufuser Plus Standard Procedure Kit | Mckinley Medical, LLC | 2005 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 1 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2 | 0 |
| 2005 | 4 | 0 |
| 2006 | 3 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1 | 1 |
| 2009 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1 | 0 |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MEB device
- #1 K250234 SMARTeZ™ Elastomeric Infusion Pump (RS series)score 14.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | — | Pain Care 3000 Named without a submission number |
What descends from it? (18)
See all 181 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K023098 | Accufuser, Accufuser Plus, Standard Procedure Kit, Accufuser Infusion Kit | 2002 | 17 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
Relatives with a Class I recall
Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.
- K081905Accuflow and Accuflux Elastomeric Infusion PumpWestmed, Inc. · 2008 · 5 generations on · ◆ in the 2008 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K023098 (Mckinley Infuser, 2002) has gone furthest, with 17 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All MEB devicesMEB Pump, Infusion, Elastomeric: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · MEB
2in 2024
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MEB
42in 2007
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MEB
17in 2018
Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MEB
1,408in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MEB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 5 | 42 | 1 | 110 |
| 2008 | 2 | — | 3 | 444 |
| 2009 | 1 | — | 48 | 798 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 2 | 1,827 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 8 (1) | 2,265 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,976 |
| 2013 | 1 | — | 2 (1) | 1,956 |
| 2014 | 1 | — | 0 | 2,695 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 2,980 |
| 2016 | 1 | — | 0 | 2,147 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,653 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 17 | 1,473 |
| 2019 | 1 | — | 0 | 974 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 2,732 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,802 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,288 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,248 |
| 2024 | 2 | — | 0 | 1,424 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,408 |
| 2026 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
BREG's Pain Care 3200 has the same intended use as BREG’s Pain Care 3000. Both units are intended to provide continuous infusion of a local anesthetic into an intra-operative site for the post-operative management of pain.
The purpose of BREG's Pain Care 3000 and 3200 is to provide a delivery mechanism of local anesthetic maintenance doses in order to sustain pain relief that is initially established by the bolus of local anesthetic that is injected intra-operatively (loading dose).
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K013928 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K013928: Pain Care 3200.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K013928
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026