510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

CSBP-001A Body Organ Perfusion System

K081482510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 11, 200814-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1750

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Toshiba America Medical Systems, In.C · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed

Cleared on Jun 11, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K052839 (GE Healthcare, 2006) and 2 other predicates after a 14-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1991.

Decided
Jun 11, 2008
Review
14 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAK
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K913770 (1991). 38 ancestors in all, the oldest K880965 (1988). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2006: 2 other ancestors2005: 1 other ancestor2003: 3 other ancestors2001: 5 other ancestors2004: 2 other ancestors2002: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor1998: 4 other ancestors1997: 1 other ancestor1996: 2 other ancestors1995: 1 other ancestor1994: 4 other ancestors1991: 1 other ancestor1988: 2 other ancestors1993: 1 other ancestorK913770 · Advantage V.S. CT/MR Rad Diagnostic Workstation · General Electric Co. · 1991K960613 · GE Advantage Windows Review Workstation · GE Medical Systems · 1996K020483 · Advantage Workstation 4.1 · GE Medical Systems · 2002 · recalledK033400 · Seno Advantage · Ge Medical Systems W-400 · 2003 · recalledK043216 · Cadstream Version 4.0 · Confirma, Inc. · 2005K052305 · Mri Soft Tissue Motion Correction Software VA10A · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2005K073373 · Syngo Volume Perfusion-CT Body · Siemens AG Medical Solutions · 2007198519901995200020052010
  1. Root · 7 generations backK913770 Advantage V.S. CT/MR Rad Diagnostic WorkstationGeneral Electric Co. · 1991
  2. 6 generations backK960613 GE Advantage Windows Review WorkstationGE Medical Systems · 1996
  3. 5 generations backK020483 Advantage Workstation 4.1GE Medical Systems · 2002 · Recalled
  4. 4 generations backK033400 Seno AdvantageGe Medical Systems W-400 · 2003 · Recalled
  5. 3 generations backK043216 Cadstream Version 4.0Confirma, Inc. · 2005
  6. 2 generations backK052305 Mri Soft Tissue Motion Correction Software VA10ASiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2005
  7. 1 generation backK073373 Syngo Volume Perfusion-CT BodySiemens AG Medical Solutions · 2007
  8. This deviceK081482 CSBP-001A Body Organ Perfusion SystemToshiba America Medical Systems, In.C · 2008
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K913770Advantage V.S. CT/MR Rad Diagnostic WorkstationGeneral Electric Co.1991—
−6K960613GE Advantage Windows Review WorkstationGE Medical Systems1996—
−5K020483Advantage Workstation 4.1GE Medical Systems20022
−4K033400Seno AdvantageGe Medical Systems W-40020036
−3K043216Cadstream Version 4.0Confirma, Inc.2005—
−2K052305Mri Soft Tissue Motion Correction Software VA10ASiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.2005—
−1K073373Syngo Volume Perfusion-CT BodySiemens AG Medical Solutions2007—
0 (this device)K081482CSBP-001A Body Organ Perfusion SystemToshiba America Medical Systems, In.C2008—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198820
199110
199310
199440
199510
199620
199710
199840
199910
200150
200210
200330
200420
200510
200620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K081482, 1991–2008Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JAK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device

  1. #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K052839CT Perfusion 4
Summary page 1
…CFR Subchapter J, Federal Diagnostic X-ray Equipment Standard Predicate Device(s): GE CT Perfusion 4 (k052839) Siemens Symgo Perfusion (k073373) Philips Brillian…
GE Healthcare20061
*K073373Syngo Volume Perfusion-CT Body
Summary page 1
…ic X-ray Equipment Standard Predicate Device(s): GE CT Perfusion 4 (k052839) Siemens Symgo Perfusion (k073373) Philips Brilliance CT (k060397) Reason For Submission New Device Descr…
Siemens AG Medical Solutions2007—
*K060937Brilliance Volume
Our reading of the summary gave K060397, FDA’s number for RF Lesion Cannula, RF Thermolesion Cannula, Thermolesion… (PAJUNK GmbH Medizintechnologie). Corrected to the number with two digits swapped whose FDA name carries the summary’s words for the device, “Philips Brilliance CT”.
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.200661

Also cleared against K052839: 6 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.8 years on median.
  • 11 of the 38 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 6 other devices also cite its predicate K052839.

How does its category compare?

All JAK devices

JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JAK

27in 2025

2007: 142008: 262009: 152010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 172014: 302015: 302016: 252017: 292018: 242019: 282020: 302021: 202022: 302023: 272024: 262025: 272026 (partial year): 21
2007high 30 (2014) · low 7 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAK

141in 2025

2007: 27 days median2008: 42 days median2009: 31 days median2010: 92 days median2011: 155 days median2012: 121 days median2013: 132 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 129 days median2017: 96 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 94 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 145 days median2022: 131 days median2023: 139 days median2024: 141 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 167 days median
2007high 200 (2014) · low 27 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAK

17in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 292010: 512011: 342012: 232013: 112014: 102015: 282016: 442017: 332018: 102019: 52020: 82021: 152022: 92023: 92024: 202025: 172026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2010) · low 5 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAK

219in 2025

2007: 762008: 1202009: 1052010: 1192011: 2052012: 1922013: 4142014: 3082015: 4542016: 3652017: 3382018: 5432019: 2332020: 1772021: 2612022: 1992023: 3102024: 2122025: 219
2007high 543 (2018) · low 76 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714271176
2008264216120
2009153129105
201079251119
20111615534205
20122812123192
20131713211414
20143020010308
20153014028454
20162512944365
2017299633338
20182411410543
201928945233
2020301128177
20212014515261
2022301319199
2023271399310
20242614120212
20252714117219
20262116723—

What is it indicated for?

This software package has been designed to evaluate the perfusion of organs and tumors.

The software allows for the calculation of blood flow, blood volume and permeabi'lity from sets pf images reconstructed from dynamic CT data acquired after the injection of a contrast bolus.

The package also allows for the independent calculation of arterial and portal venous component of hepatic perfusion. It supports the evaluation of regions of interest and the visual inspection of time density curves.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K081482: CSBP-001A Body Organ Perfusion System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K081482

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026