510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Endoskeleton to

K102067510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 5, 2010105-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Titan Spine, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Nov 5, 2010 as substantially equivalent to P950019 (Stryker Spine, 1996) and 3 other predicates after a 105-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 2001. 337 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 5, 2010
Review
105 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K003275 (2001). 19 ancestors in all, the oldest K841189 (1984). 337 later devices descend from it, 6 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1999: 3 other ancestors1996: 2 other ancestors2007: 1 other ancestor2003: 2 other ancestors2002: 1 other ancestor2001: 2 other ancestors2000: 1 other ancestor1984: 1 other ancestor2014: 4 descendants cleared2017: 7 descendants cleared2020: 26 descendants cleared2016: 8 descendants cleared2018: 12 descendants cleared2019: 15 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2023: 47 descendants cleared2021: 29 descendants cleared2022: 38 descendants cleared2024: 51 descendants cleared2025: 54 descendants cleared2026: 45 descendants clearedK003275 · Synthes Synmesh Spacer System · Synthes (Usa) · 2001 · recalledK020152 · Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI · Synthes (Usa) · 2002K024364 · Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI (Curved and Narrow) · Synthes (Usa) · 2003K032812 · Endoskeleton TA Vertebral Body Replacement · Orthovita, Inc. · 2003 · recalledK080615 · Endoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd) · Titan Spine, LLC · 2008K083714 · Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd) · Titan Spine, LLC · 200919801990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors2 generations back: 3 other ancestors3 generations back: 3 other ancestors4 generations back: 2 other ancestors5 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 6 descendants2 generations forward: 17 descendants3 generations forward: 34 descendants4 generations forward: 48 descendants5 generations forward: 80 descendants6 generations forward: 83 descendants7 generations forward: 47 descendants8 generations forward: 16 descendants9 generations forward: 4 descendants10 generations forward: 1 descendant11 generations forward: 1 descendant K083714 · Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd) · Titan Spine, LLC · 2009K080615 · Endoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd) · Titan Spine, LLC · 2008K032812 · Endoskeleton TA Vertebral Body Replacement · Orthovita, Inc. · 2003 · recalledK024364 · Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI (Curved and Narrow) · Synthes (Usa) · 2003K020152 · Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI · Synthes (Usa) · 2002K003275 · Synthes Synmesh Spacer System · Synthes (Usa) · 2001 · recalled−50+5+10
  1. Root · 6 generations backK003275 Synthes Synmesh Spacer SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2001 · Recalled
  2. 5 generations backK020152 Synthes Vertebral Spacer TISynthes (Usa) · 2002
  3. 4 generations backK024364 Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI (Curved and Narrow)Synthes (Usa) · 2003
  4. 3 generations backK032812 Endoskeleton TA Vertebral Body ReplacementOrthovita, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  5. 2 generations backK080615 Endoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)Titan Spine, LLC · 2008
  6. 1 generation backK083714 Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)Titan Spine, LLC · 2009
  7. This deviceK102067 Endoskeleton toTitan Spine, LLC · 2010
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 267 of its ownK140055 Endoskeleton (R) TL Interbody Fusion DeviceTitan Spine, LLC · 2014
  9. Descendant · cites it directly · 265 of its ownK141953 Endoskeleton; TA Ibd and VBR, to and TT, Tas, TC, TLTitan Spine, LLC · 2014 · Recalled
  10. Descendant · 2 generations on · 236 of its ownK152475 FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2016
  11. Descendant · 3 generations on · 189 of its ownK153495 Avenue L Lateral Lumbar Cage, Avenue T TLIF Cage System, ROI-A ALIF…Ldr Spine USA · 2016 · Recalled
  12. Descendant · 4 generations on · 161 of its ownK162103 Choice Spine Lumbar Spacer System (Sabre™, Shark™, Hornet™…Choicespine, LP · 2016

Showing 5 of 337 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2014: 42015: 12016: 82017: 72018: 122019: 152020: 262021: 292022: 382023: 472024: 512025: 542026: 45
2014high 54 (2025) · low 1 (2015)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 337 · See all
  • K140055Endoskeleton (R) TL Interbody Fusion DeviceTitan Spine, LLC · 2014 · cites it directly267descendants
  • K141953Endoskeleton; TA Ibd and VBR, to and TT, Tas, TC, TLTitan Spine, LLC · 2014 · cites it directly265descendants
  • K152475FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2016 · 2 generations on236descendants
  • K153495Avenue L Lateral Lumbar Cage, Avenue T TLIF Cage System, ROI-A ALIF Cage System, ROI-T…Ldr Spine USA · 2016 · 3 generations on189descendants
  • K162103Choice Spine Lumbar Spacer System (Sabre™, Shark™, Hornet™, Harpoon™), Choice Spine…Choicespine, LP · 2016 · 4 generations on161descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K003275Synthes Synmesh Spacer SystemSynthes (Usa)200114
−5K020152Synthes Vertebral Spacer TISynthes (Usa)2002—
−4K024364Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI (Curved and Narrow)Synthes (Usa)2003—
−3K032812Endoskeleton TA Vertebral Body ReplacementOrthovita, Inc.20031
−2K080615Endoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)Titan Spine, LLC2008—
−1K083714Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)Titan Spine, LLC2009—
0 (this device)K102067Endoskeleton toTitan Spine, LLC2010—
+1K140055Endoskeleton (R) TL Interbody Fusion DeviceTitan Spine, LLC2014—
+1K141953Endoskeleton; TA Ibd and VBR, to and TT, Tas, TC, TLTitan Spine, LLC20142
+2K152475FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc.2016—
+3K153495Avenue L Lateral Lumbar Cage, Avenue T TLIF Cage System, ROI-A ALIF Cage…Ldr Spine USA20161
+4K162103Choice Spine Lumbar Spacer System (Sabre™, Shark™, Hornet™, Harpoon™), Choice…Choicespine, LP2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198410
199620
199930
200010
200120
200210
200320
200710

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201440
201510
201680
201770
2018120
2019150
2020260
2021290
2022380
2023470
2024510
2025540
2026450
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K102067, 2001–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*P950019Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (TFC)(TM) with Instrumentation
Summary page 1
…Devices The Endloskeletone TO was shown to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices. The predicate devices include the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019), the Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025), the Endloskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (K083714) and the BAK and BAK Proximity (P950002-S3…
Stryker Spine19961
*P960025Brantigen I/F Cage (R) Used with VSP (R) Spine Plates and Pedicle Screws
Summary page 1
…as shown to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices. The predicate devices include the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019), the Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025), the Endloskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (K083714) and the BAK and BAK Proximity (P950002-S3). Intended Use / Indications…
Depuy Spine, Inc.1999—
*K083714Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)
Summary page 1
…ted predicate devices. The predicate devices include the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019), the Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025), the Endloskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (K083714) and the BAK and BAK Proximity (P950002-S3). Intended Use / Indications for Use The Endloskeleton TO' Interbody Fusion Device is…
Titan Spine, LLC2009—
*P950002Bak Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 1
…ices include the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (P950019), the Lumbar I/F Cage (P960025), the Endloskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (K083714) and the BAK and BAK Proximity (P950002-S3). Intended Use / Indications for Use The Endloskeleton TO' Interbody Fusion Device is indicated for use in skeletally mature…
Zimmer Spine, Inc.1996—

Also cleared against P950019: 37 other devices →

What descends from it? (337)

See all 337

6 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K140055Endoskeleton (R) TL Interbody Fusion DeviceTitan Spine, LLC2014267
K141953Endoskeleton; TA Ibd and VBR, to and TT, Tas, TC, TLTitan Spine, LLC2014265
K141135Juliet LLSpineart2014146
K142589Endoskeleton TA IBD and VBR, Endoskeleton TO and TT, Endoskeleton TAS, Endoskeleton TAS…Titan Spine, LLC2014106
K170399Endoskeleton TO Interbody Fusion Device (IBD)Titan Spine, LLC2017105
K163481HALF DOME Posterior Lumbar Interbody SystemAstura Medical201731

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 12 months on median.
  • 4 of the 19 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K140055 (Titan Spine, LLC, 2014) has gone furthest, with 267 descendants of its own.
  • 37 other devices also cite its predicate P950019.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The Endoskeleton TO' Interbody Fusion Device is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients

with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is

defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and

radiographic studies. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment prior

to treatment with the devices. The device must be used with supplemental fixation. These DDD

patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s).

It is indicated to be used with autograft bone.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K102067: Endoskeleton to.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K102067

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026