510(k) · Cleared
ClearedEndoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Titan Spine, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on Jun 17, 2008 as substantially equivalent to P950002 (Zimmer Spine, Inc., 1996) and 3 other predicates after a 105-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2001. 1 of the 576 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 564 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Jun 17, 2008
- Review
- 105 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 4
Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K003275 (2001). 11 ancestors in all, the oldest K841189 (1984). 564 later devices descend from it, 7 citing it directly. 1 of the 576 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.
- Root · 4 generations backK003275 Synthes Synmesh Spacer SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2001 · Recalled
- 3 generations backK020152 Synthes Vertebral Spacer TISynthes (Usa) · 2002
- 2 generations backK024364 Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI (Curved and Narrow)Synthes (Usa) · 2003
- 1 generation backK032812 Endoskeleton TA Vertebral Body ReplacementOrthovita, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
- This deviceK080615 Endoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)Titan Spine, LLC · 2008
- Descendant · cites it directly · 480 of its ownK101310 VU Apod Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceTheken Spine, LLC · 2010
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 460 of its ownK133286 Midline (TM)Centinel Spine, Inc. · 2014
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 459 of its ownK141942 Midline II TICentinel Spine, Inc. · 2014
- Descendant · cites it directly · 412 of its ownK083714 Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)Titan Spine, LLC · 2009
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 368 of its ownK150643 Centinel Spine STALIF TT, STALIF MIDLINE, MIDLINE II, MIDLINE II-TiCentinel Spine, Inc. · 2015
Showing 5 of 564 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Class I recalls in this family
- K211616 ExcelsiusHub6 generations on · 2021
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 564 · See all- K101310VU Apod Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceTheken Spine, LLC · 2010 · cites it directly480descendants
- K133286Midline (TM)Centinel Spine, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on460descendants
- K141942Midline II TICentinel Spine, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on459descendants
- K083714Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd)Titan Spine, LLC · 2009 · cites it directly412descendants
- K150643Centinel Spine STALIF TT, STALIF MIDLINE, MIDLINE II, MIDLINE II-TiCentinel Spine, Inc. · 2015 · 3 generations on368descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −4 | K003275 | Synthes Synmesh Spacer System | Synthes (Usa) | 2001 | 14 |
| −3 | K020152 | Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI | Synthes (Usa) | 2002 | — |
| −2 | K024364 | Synthes Vertebral Spacer TI (Curved and Narrow) | Synthes (Usa) | 2003 | — |
| −1 | K032812 | Endoskeleton TA Vertebral Body Replacement | Orthovita, Inc. | 2003 | 1 |
| 0 (this device) | K080615 | Endoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd) | Titan Spine, LLC | 2008 | — |
| +1 | K101310 | VU Apod Intervertebral Body Fusion Device | Theken Spine, LLC | 2010 | — |
| +2 | K133286 | Midline (TM) | Centinel Spine, Inc. | 2014 | — |
| +2 | K141942 | Midline II TI | Centinel Spine, Inc. | 2014 | — |
| +1 | K083714 | Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd) | Titan Spine, LLC | 2009 | — |
| +3 | K150643 | Centinel Spine STALIF TT, STALIF MIDLINE, MIDLINE II, MIDLINE II-Ti | Centinel Spine, Inc. | 2015 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 1 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 1 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
| 2014 | 7 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6 | 0 |
| 2016 | 14 | 0 |
| 2017 | 19 | 0 |
| 2018 | 28 | 0 |
| 2019 | 38 | 0 |
| 2020 | 58 | 0 |
| 2021 | 51 | 1 |
| 2022 | 61 | 0 |
| 2023 | 68 | 0 |
| 2024 | 83 | 0 |
| 2025 | 67 | 0 |
| 2026 | 58 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | P950002 | Bak Interbody Fusion SystemSummary page 1…eared devices and has the same indications for use, design, function, and materials used. The four predicate devices include the BAK Interbody Fusion Device (Spine-Tech, P950002), Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P970015) and the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surgical Dynamics, P950019) and the… | 1996 |
| * | P970015 | Inter Fix Threaded Fusion DeviceSummary page 1…function, and materials used. The four predicate devices include the BAK Interbody Fusion Device (Spine-Tech, P950002), Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P970015) and the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surgical Dynamics, P950019) and the Titan Spine Endoskeleton TA® VBR (K032812). Performance T… | 1999 |
| * | P950019 | Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (TFC)(TM) with InstrumentationSummary page 1…ude the BAK Interbody Fusion Device (Spine-Tech, P950002), Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P970015) and the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surgical Dynamics, P950019) and the Titan Spine Endoskeleton TA® VBR (K032812). Performance Testing: The pre-clinical testing performed indicated that the… | 1996 |
| * | K032812 | Endoskeleton TA Vertebral Body ReplacementSummary page 1…50002), Inter Fix Threaded Fusion Device (Sofamor Danek, P970015) and the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (Surgical Dynamics, P950019) and the Titan Spine Endoskeleton TA® VBR (K032812). Performance Testing: The pre-clinical testing performed indicated that the Endoskeleton TA® Interbody Fusion Device is adequa… | 2003 |
What descends from it? (564)
See all 5647 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K101310 | VU Apod Intervertebral Body Fusion Device | 2010 | 480 |
| K083714 | Endoskeleton TT Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd) | 2009 | 412 |
| K111626 | Endoskeleton (R) Tas | 2011 | 273 |
| K141953 | Endoskeleton; TA Ibd and VBR, to and TT, Tas, TC, TL | 2014 | 265 |
| K163269 | Endoskeleton (R) TAS Interbody Fusion Device / Endoskeleton (R) TAS Hyperlordotic… | 2017 | 143 |
| K142589 | Endoskeleton TA IBD and VBR, Endoskeleton TO and TT, Endoskeleton TAS, Endoskeleton TAS… | 2014 | 106 |
| K191581 | Endoskeleton TL Interbody Fusion Device, Endoskeleton TL Hyperlordotic Interbody Fusion… | 2020 | 81 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
Relatives with a Class I recall
Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.
- K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 6 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 7 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 12 months on median.
- 4 of the 11 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K101310 (Theken Spine, LLC, 2010) has gone furthest, with 480 descendants of its own.
- 34 other devices also cite its predicate P950002.
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Endoskeleton TA® Interbody Fusion Device is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the devices. The device may be used with supplemental fixation. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). It is indicated to be use with autograft bone.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K080615 · printed Nov 3, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K080615: Endoskeleton TA Interbody Fusion Device (Ibd).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K080615
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026