510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2014

Airo CT System

K131431510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 26, 2013132-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1750Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Mobius Imaging, LLC · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed

Cleared on Sep 26, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K102677 (Neurologica Corporation, 2011) after a 132-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1995. 1 of the 28 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Sep 26, 2013
Review
132 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAK
Recalls
1
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K944131 (1995). 25 ancestors in all, the oldest K780395 (1978). 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly. 1 of the 28 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2009: 1 other ancestor2005: 1 other ancestor2002: 1 other ancestor2000: 2 other ancestors1999: 2 other ancestors1978: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor, 1 with a Class I recall11994: 2 other ancestors1995: 2 other ancestors1992: 4 other ancestors2016: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant clearedK944131 · Anatom 2000 · Analogic Corp. · 1995K964890 · Anatom 2000 · Analogic Corp. · 1997K982631 · Philips Tomoscan CS · Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1998K991278 · Philips Tomoscan AV-NT · Philips Medical Systems North America, Inc. · 1999K014240 · Pronto · Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2002K040902 · Hitachi Presto · Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2004 · recalledK071806 · Eclos Computed Tomography X-Ray System · Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2007 · recalledK102677 · Bodytom NL 4000 · Neurologica Corporation · 201119801990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 2 other ancestors3 generations back: 4 other ancestors4 generations back: 4 other ancestors, 1 with a Class I recall15 generations back: 4 other ancestors6 generations back: 2 other ancestors7 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant K102677 · Bodytom NL 4000 · Neurologica Corporation · 2011K071806 · Eclos Computed Tomography X-Ray System · Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2007 · recalledK040902 · Hitachi Presto · Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2004 · recalledK014240 · Pronto · Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2002K991278 · Philips Tomoscan AV-NT · Philips Medical Systems North America, Inc. · 1999K982631 · Philips Tomoscan CS · Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1998K964890 · Anatom 2000 · Analogic Corp. · 1997K944131 · Anatom 2000 · Analogic Corp. · 1995−50
  1. Root · 8 generations backK944131 Anatom 2000Analogic Corp. · 1995
  2. 7 generations backK964890 Anatom 2000Analogic Corp. · 1997
  3. 6 generations backK982631 Philips Tomoscan CSPhilips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1998
  4. 5 generations backK991278 Philips Tomoscan AV-NTPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc. · 1999
  5. 4 generations backK014240 ProntoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2002
  6. 3 generations backK040902 Hitachi PrestoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  7. 2 generations backK071806 Eclos Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  8. 1 generation backK102677 Bodytom NL 4000Neurologica Corporation · 2011
  9. This deviceK131431 Airo CT SystemMobius Imaging, LLC · 2013
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK160126 AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging · 2016 · Recalled
  11. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK180393 AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging, LLC · 2018 · Recalled

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K160126AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging · 2016 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K180393AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging, LLC · 2018 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K944131Anatom 2000Analogic Corp.1995—
−7K964890Anatom 2000Analogic Corp.1997—
−6K982631Philips Tomoscan CSPhilips Medical Systems, Inc.1998—
−5K991278Philips Tomoscan AV-NTPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc.1999—
−4K014240ProntoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.2002—
−3K040902Hitachi PrestoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.20044
−2K071806Eclos Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.20071
−1K102677Bodytom NL 4000Neurologica Corporation2011—
0 (this device)K131431Airo CT SystemMobius Imaging, LLC2013—
+1K160126AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging20162
+2K180393AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging, LLC20185

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
197810
199240
199420
199520
199611
199920
200020
200210
200510
200910

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201610
201810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K131431, 1995–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device

  1. #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K102677Bodytom NL 4000
Summary page 1
…legally marketed device to which substantial equivalence is being claimed is as follows: *Neurologica NL4000 BodyTom' m CT System - Premarket Notification K102677 (cleared on March 24, 2011, product code 90OJAK) 4. Device Description: The Mobius Airo is a mobile high reso…
Neurologica Corporation2011—

Also cleared against K102677: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K160126AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging20161

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 8, 2014Class IIZ-1016-2015Software designThere is a risk that during the transfer of an image and navigation data to the Brainlab Curve Image Guided Surgery Navigation System after a CT scan, an error may occur, causing either no navigation data or incorrect navigation data…

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K962738Millennium MT and Millennium MG Nuclear Medicine SystemsGE Medical Systems · 1996 · 4 generations back · ◆ in the 1996 ancestors bar of FIG. 13 Class I recalls

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 18 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.5 years on median.
  • 6 of the 25 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K160126 (Mobius Imaging, 2016) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K102677.

How does its category compare?

All JAK devices

JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JAK

27in 2025

2007: 142008: 262009: 152010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 172014: 302015: 302016: 252017: 292018: 242019: 282020: 302021: 202022: 302023: 272024: 262025: 272026 (partial year): 21
2007high 30 (2014) · low 7 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAK

141in 2025

2007: 27 days median2008: 42 days median2009: 31 days median2010: 92 days median2011: 155 days median2012: 121 days median2013: 132 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 129 days median2017: 96 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 94 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 145 days median2022: 131 days median2023: 139 days median2024: 141 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 167 days median
2007high 200 (2014) · low 27 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAK

17in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 292010: 512011: 342012: 232013: 112014: 102015: 282016: 442017: 332018: 102019: 52020: 82021: 152022: 92023: 92024: 202025: 172026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2010) · low 5 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAK

219in 2025

2007: 762008: 1202009: 1052010: 1192011: 2052012: 1922013: 4142014: 3082015: 4542016: 3652017: 3382018: 5432019: 2332020: 1772021: 2612022: 1992023: 3102024: 2122025: 219
2007high 543 (2018) · low 76 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714271176
2008264216120
2009153129105
201079251119
20111615534205
20122812123192
20131713211414
20143020010308
20153014028454
20162512944365
2017299633338
20182411410543
201928945233
2020301128177
20212014515261
2022301319199
2023271399310
20242614120212
20252714117219
20262116723—

What is it indicated for?

The AIRO' m is intended to be used for non-contrast X-ray computed tomography applications for anatomy that can be imaged in the 107cm aperture excluding pediatric patients and patients weighing over 400 lbs (182 kg).

Airo is contraindicated as the principal means of guidance during surgical procedures. The physician must verify navigation accuracy using known anatomical landmarks or an equivalent verification method when used in surgical procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K131431: Airo CT System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K131431

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026