510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray System

K180393510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 15, 201830-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1750Recalls 5

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Mobius Imaging, LLC · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed

Cleared on Mar 15, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K160126 (Mobius Imaging, 2016) after a 30-day review. Its family tree reaches back 10 generations to 1995. 1 of the 28 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. It has been recalled 5 times.

Decided
Mar 15, 2018
Review
30 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAK
Recalls
5
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 10 generations to K944131 (1995). 27 ancestors in all, the oldest K780395 (1978). No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 1 of the 28 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

  1. Root · 10 generations backK944131 Anatom 2000Analogic Corp. · 1995
  2. 6 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK102677 Bodytom NL 4000Neurologica Corporation · 2011
  4. 2 generations backK131431 Airo CT SystemMobius Imaging, LLC · 2013 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK160126 AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging · 2016 · Recalled
  6. This deviceK180393 AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging, LLC · 2018
Show all 10 generations
  1. Root · 10 generations backK944131 Anatom 2000Analogic Corp. · 1995
  2. 9 generations backK964890 Anatom 2000Analogic Corp. · 1997
  3. 8 generations backK982631 Philips Tomoscan CSPhilips Medical Systems, Inc. · 1998
  4. 7 generations backK991278 Philips Tomoscan AV-NTPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc. · 1999
  5. 6 generations backK014240 ProntoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2002
  6. 5 generations backK040902 Hitachi PrestoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  7. 4 generations backK071806 Eclos Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  8. 3 generations backK102677 Bodytom NL 4000Neurologica Corporation · 2011
  9. 2 generations backK131431 Airo CT SystemMobius Imaging, LLC · 2013 · Recalled
  10. 1 generation backK160126 AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging · 2016 · Recalled
  11. This deviceK180393 AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging, LLC · 2018

Class I recalls in this family

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−10K944131Anatom 2000Analogic Corp.1995—
−9K964890Anatom 2000Analogic Corp.1997—
−8K982631Philips Tomoscan CSPhilips Medical Systems, Inc.1998—
−7K991278Philips Tomoscan AV-NTPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc.1999—
−6K014240ProntoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.2002—
−5K040902Hitachi PrestoHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.20044
−4K071806Eclos Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemHitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.20071
−3K102677Bodytom NL 4000Neurologica Corporation2011—
−2K131431Airo CT SystemMobius Imaging, LLC20131
−1K160126AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging20162
0 (this device)K180393AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray SystemMobius Imaging, LLC2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
197810
199240
199420
199520
199611
199920
200020
200210
200510
200910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K180393, 1995–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device

  1. #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K160126AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray System
Summary page 4
…te Device(s): The legally marketed device to which substantial equivalence is being claimed is as follows:  Airo Mobile CT System – Premarket Notification K160126 (cleared on April 19, 2016, product code 90 JAK) 4. Device Description: The Mobius Airo is a Mobile Intraopera…
Mobius Imaging20162

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 4, 2025Class IIZ-1040-2026Labeling Change ControlAIRO pendant replacement kits and upgrade do not possess the "Safe Hand Position Warning" label.
Dec 4, 2025Class IIZ-1041-2026Labeling Change ControlAIRO pendant replacement kits and upgrade do not possess the "Safe Hand Position Warning" label.
Dec 7, 2022Class IIZ-0957-2023Use errorStryker received one report of an injury to an untrained user that occurred while the untrained user was moving an Airo TruCT unit in reverse. The firm will increase visibility of instructions for users to consider when transporting the…
Nov 18, 2022Class IIZ-0344-2023OtherStryker received a report of a battery fire involving an Airo TruCT unit previously subjected to bypass charging. The firm is notifying customers with units whose battery monitoring systems were bypassed to charge the batteries; the…
Aug 1, 2018Class IIZ-2991-2018Radiation Control for Health and Safety ActThe Tube Current Modulation feature (Modulated Scans) is not working in AIRO systems with software version 2.0.0.0, and operators would not be able to detect this fault until after a scan is completed.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K962738Millennium MT and Millennium MG Nuclear Medicine SystemsGE Medical Systems · 1996 · 6 generations back · ◆ in the 1996 ancestors bar of FIG. 13 Class I recalls

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 23 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.5 years on median.
  • 8 of the 27 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All JAK devices

JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JAK

27in 2025

2007: 142008: 262009: 152010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 172014: 302015: 302016: 252017: 292018: 242019: 282020: 302021: 202022: 302023: 272024: 262025: 272026 (partial year): 21
2007high 30 (2014) · low 7 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAK

141in 2025

2007: 27 days median2008: 42 days median2009: 31 days median2010: 92 days median2011: 155 days median2012: 121 days median2013: 132 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 129 days median2017: 96 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 94 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 145 days median2022: 131 days median2023: 139 days median2024: 141 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 167 days median
2007high 200 (2014) · low 27 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAK

17in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 292010: 512011: 342012: 232013: 112014: 102015: 282016: 442017: 332018: 102019: 52020: 82021: 152022: 92023: 92024: 202025: 172026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2010) · low 5 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAK

219in 2025

2007: 762008: 1202009: 1052010: 1192011: 2052012: 1922013: 4142014: 3082015: 4542016: 3652017: 3382018: 5432019: 2332020: 1772021: 2612022: 1992023: 3102024: 2122025: 219
2007high 543 (2018) · low 76 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714271176
2008264216120
2009153129105
201079251119
20111615534205
20122812123192
20131713211414
20143020010308
20153014028454
20162512944365
2017299633338
20182411410543
201928945233
2020301128177
20212014515261
2022301319199
2023271399310
20242614120212
20252714117219
20262116723—

What is it indicated for?

The AIRO® is intended to be used for X-ray computed tomography applications for anatomy that can be imaged in the 107cm aperture excluding patients weighing over 400 lbs (182 kg).

Contraindications:

Airo is contraindicated as the principal means of guidance during invasive procedures when real-time imaging is needed (e.g., CT Fluoroscopy procedures). In addition, the physician must verify navigation accuracy using an adequate verification method when used with Navigation Systems during surgical procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K180393: AIRO Computed Tomography (CT) X-ray System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K180393

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026