510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2014

Myoperfusion

K132523510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 12, 2013122-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1750Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Toshibamedical Systems Corporation · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed

Cleared on Dec 12, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K112531 (Vital Images, Inc., 2011) and 2 other predicates after a 122-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1997. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Dec 12, 2013
Review
122 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAK
Recalls
1
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K971684 (1997). 32 ancestors in all, the oldest K913770 (1991). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 9 generations backK971684 Magnetom Project 047 System (Numaris 3.5 Software)Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 1997 · Recalled
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK092519 Syngo.XSiemens AG Medical Solutions · 2009 · Recalled
  4. 2 generations backK110366 Syngo.CT Cardiac FunctionSiemens AG · 2011 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK112531 Vitrea CT Myocardial AnalysisVital Images, Inc. · 2011
  6. This deviceK132523 MyoperfusionToshibamedical Systems Corporation · 2013
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK150104 Vitrea CT Myocardial PerfusionVital Images, Inc. · 2015
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK971684 Magnetom Project 047 System (Numaris 3.5 Software)Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 1997 · Recalled
  2. 8 generations backK032428 Magnetom Avanto MR SystemSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  3. 7 generations backK041112 Magnetom Espree SystemSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  4. 6 generations backK052423 Magnetom Systems with Syngo Expert - I OptionSiemens Medi Cal Solutions, Inc. · 2006
  5. 5 generations backK061964 Syngo Multimodality WorkplaceSiemens AG Medical Solutions · 2006
  6. 4 generations backK072728 Syngo Multimodality WorkplaceSiemens AG Medical Solutions · 2008
  7. 3 generations backK092519 Syngo.XSiemens AG Medical Solutions · 2009 · Recalled
  8. 2 generations backK110366 Syngo.CT Cardiac FunctionSiemens AG · 2011 · Recalled
  9. 1 generation backK112531 Vitrea CT Myocardial AnalysisVital Images, Inc. · 2011
  10. This deviceK132523 MyoperfusionToshibamedical Systems Corporation · 2013

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K150104Vitrea CT Myocardial PerfusionVital Images, Inc. · 2015 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K971684Magnetom Project 047 System (Numaris 3.5 Software)Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.19974
−8K032428Magnetom Avanto MR SystemSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.20034
−7K041112Magnetom Espree SystemSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.20044
−6K052423Magnetom Systems with Syngo Expert - I OptionSiemens Medi Cal Solutions, Inc.2006—
−5K061964Syngo Multimodality WorkplaceSiemens AG Medical Solutions2006—
−4K072728Syngo Multimodality WorkplaceSiemens AG Medical Solutions2008—
−3K092519Syngo.XSiemens AG Medical Solutions20094
−2K110366Syngo.CT Cardiac FunctionSiemens AG20111
−1K112531Vitrea CT Myocardial AnalysisVital Images, Inc.2011—
0 (this device)K132523MyoperfusionToshibamedical Systems Corporation2013—
+1K150104Vitrea CT Myocardial PerfusionVital Images, Inc.2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199110
199610
199710
199910
200030
200140
200220
200410
200540
200720
200830

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K132523, 1997–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JAK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device

  1. #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K112531Vitrea CT Myocardial Analysis
Summary page 2
…edical Systems Siemens Medical Solutions, Inc. 510(k) Clearance K1 12531 K073138 K1 10366 Number…
Vital Images, Inc.2011—
*K073138Cardiq Express Version 2.0
Summary page 2
…edical Solutions, Inc. 510(k) Clearance K1 12531 K073138 K1 10366 Number _________ Clea…
GE Medical Systems2008—
*K110366Syngo.CT Cardiac Function
Summary page 2
…Solutions, Inc. 510(k) Clearance K1 12531 K073138 K1 10366 Number _________ Clearance Date…
Siemens AG20111

Also cleared against K112531: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K150104Vitrea CT Myocardial PerfusionVital Images, Inc.20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jun 13, 2014Class IIZ-2085-2014Software designPartial loss of monitoring with the CARESCAPE Monitor B850, B650 or B450. When connecting the PDM (Patient Data Module) to the CARESCAPE B850, B650 or B450 monitor with software version 2 the PDM may not start communicating to the monitor…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.5 years on median.
  • 13 of the 32 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K150104 (Vital Images, Inc., 2015) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K112531.

How does its category compare?

All JAK devices

JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JAK

27in 2025

2007: 142008: 262009: 152010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 172014: 302015: 302016: 252017: 292018: 242019: 282020: 302021: 202022: 302023: 272024: 262025: 272026 (partial year): 21
2007high 30 (2014) · low 7 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAK

141in 2025

2007: 27 days median2008: 42 days median2009: 31 days median2010: 92 days median2011: 155 days median2012: 121 days median2013: 132 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 129 days median2017: 96 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 94 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 145 days median2022: 131 days median2023: 139 days median2024: 141 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 167 days median
2007high 200 (2014) · low 27 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAK

17in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 292010: 512011: 342012: 232013: 112014: 102015: 282016: 442017: 332018: 102019: 52020: 82021: 152022: 92023: 92024: 202025: 172026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2010) · low 5 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAK

219in 2025

2007: 762008: 1202009: 1052010: 1192011: 2052012: 1922013: 4142014: 3082015: 4542016: 3652017: 3382018: 5432019: 2332020: 1772021: 2612022: 1992023: 3102024: 2122025: 219
2007high 543 (2018) · low 76 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714271176
2008264216120
2009153129105
201079251119
20111615534205
20122812123192
20131713211414
20143020010308
20153014028454
20162512944365
2017299633338
20182411410543
201928945233
2020301128177
20212014515261
2022301319199
2023271399310
20242614120212
20252714117219
20262116723—

What is it indicated for?

This software is intended to be used for the visualization of non-reversible perfusion defects (hypo/hyper dense areas) in patients with angina or with a previous myocardial infarct. Included software tools may aid a trained user in monitoring the disease state and treatment over time. This software provides maps and the values used to generate the maps. The information provided is intended to be qualitative in nature and when used by a qualified physician may aid in the identification of myocardial enhancement defects and the follow up of such findings.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K132523: Myoperfusion.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K132523

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026