510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cina-Aspects

K233342510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 15, 2024168-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2060

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Avicenna.Ai · POK Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Software For Lesions Suspicious For Cancer

Cleared on Mar 15, 2024 as substantially equivalent to K200760 (Ischemaview, Inc., 2020) after a 168-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2017.

Decided
Mar 15, 2024
Review
168 days
Class
Class II
Product code
POK
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to DEN170022 (2017). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

DEN170022 · QuantX · Quantitative Insights, Inc. · 2017K200760 · Rapid ASPECTS · Ischemaview, Inc. · 2020201620182020202220242026
  1. Root · 2 generations backDEN170022 QuantXQuantitative Insights, Inc. · 2017
  2. 1 generation backK200760 Rapid ASPECTSIschemaview, Inc. · 2020
  3. This deviceK233342 Cina-AspectsAvicenna.Ai · 2024
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2DEN170022QuantXQuantitative Insights, Inc.2017—
−1K200760Rapid ASPECTSIschemaview, Inc.2020—
0 (this device)K233342Cina-AspectsAvicenna.Ai2024—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K233342, 2017–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in POK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new POK device

  1. #1 K242342 Fetal EchoScanscore 16.7 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K200760Rapid ASPECTS
Summary page 4
…y equivalent to the following predicate device with regard to indications for use, performance, and technological characteristics: 510(k): K200760 Trade Name: Rapid ASPECTS Manufacturer: ISchemaView Inc. Classifica…
Ischemaview, Inc.2020—

Also cleared against K200760: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 7 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.7 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K200760.

How does its category compare?

All POK devices

POK Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Software For Lesions Suspicious For Cancer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · POK

5in 2025

2017: 12019: 12020: 22021: 22022: 12023: 12024: 62025: 52026 (partial year): 5
2007high 6 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · POK

119in 2025

2024: 161 days median2025: 119 days median2026 (partial year): 155 days median
2007high 161 (2024) · low 119 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · POK

No recall names POK since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · POK

1in 2021

2021: 1
2007high 1 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code POK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20171—00
20180—00
20191—00
20202—00
20212—01
20221—00
20231—00
2024616100
2025511900
202651550—

What is it indicated for?

CINA-ASPECTS is a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) software device used to assist the clinician in the assessment and characterization of brain tissue abnormalities using CT image data. The Software automatically reorients images, segments and analyzes ASPECTS Regions of lnterest (ROIs). CINA-ASPECTS extracts image data for the ROI(s) to provide analysis and computer analytics based on morphological characteristics. The imaging features are then…

Read the full statement (350 words)

CINA-ASPECTS is a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) software device used to assist the clinician in the assessment and characterization of brain tissue abnormalities using CT image data.

The Software automatically reorients images, segments and analyzes ASPECTS Regions of lnterest (ROIs). CINA-ASPECTS extracts image data for the ROI(s) to provide analysis and computer analytics based on morphological characteristics. The imaging features are then synthesized by an artificial intelligence algorithm into a single ASPECT (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT) Score.

CINA-ASPECTS is indicated for evaluation of patients presenting for diagnostic imaging workup with known MCA or ICA occlusion, for evaluation of extent of disease. Extent of disease refers to the number of ASPECTS regions affected which is reflected in the total score. This device provides information that may be useful in the characterization of early ischemic (acute) brain tissue injury during image interpretation.

CINA-ASPECTS provides a comparative analysis to the ASPECTS standard of care radiologist assessment using the ASPECTS region definitions and highlighting ROIs and numerical scoring.

Limitations:

1. CINA-ASPECT is not intended for primary interpretation of CT images. It is used to assist physician evaluation.

2. CINA-ASPECT has been validated in patients with known MCA or ICA unilateral occlusion prior to ASPECTS scoring.

3. CINA-ASPECTS is not suitable for use on brain scans displaying neurological pathologies other than acute stroke, such as tumors or abscesses, traumatic brain injuries, hemorrhagic transformation and hematoma.

4. Use of CINA-ASPECT in clinical settings other than brain ischemia within 12 hours from time last known well, caused by known ICA or MCA occlusions has not been tested.

5. CINA-ASPECTS has only been validated and is intended to be used in patient populations aged over 21.

6. CINA-ASPECTS has been validated and is intended to be used with images acquired with Canon Medical Systems Corporation, GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare and Siemens Healthineers scanners.

Contraindications/Exclusions/Cautions:

▪ Patient motion: Excessive patient motion leading to artifacts that make the scan technically inadequate.

▪ Important streak artifacts and noisy images: Presence of important streak artifact and significant noise within the NCCT images that make the scan technically inadequate.

▪ Hemorrhagic Transformation, Hematoma.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K233342: Cina-Aspects.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K233342

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026